Biological Explanations Of SZ Flashcards
What are the two factors the biological explanations are based on:
The genetic basis
The neural basis correlates including the dopamine hypothesis
What’s the genetic basis about (short)
Genetic factors are normally tested through family, twin, and adoption studies
AO1 points - family studies
- determines if SZ ppls relatives are more similarly affected than non relatives
- both parents have SZ, then offspring = 46% chance
- one parent has SZ, offspring = 13% chance
- sibling has SZ’ 9% chance
What do twin studies investigate (AO1 points)
- can check nature / nurture debate of contributions on sz
- The more genetically similar you are, more likely to get MZ:
MZ (100% identical twins) = 48% concordance rate
DZ (50% identical twins) = 17% concordance rate
Adoption studies AO1 points
- to see influence of nature and nurture when away from SZ parents etc
Tienari et al study showed only a small link between genes and SZ
What did Tienari et al do?
Finland study
164 adoptees who’s biological mothers had been diagnosed with SZ, 11 (6.7%) diagnosed with SZ
Control group - of 197 adoptees (adopted by ppl that were not schizophrenic), only 4 (2%) were diagnosed with SZ
Candidate gene associated with SZ
PCM1
But is sz considered monogenic or polygenic
Polygenic
Evidence using family studies found what chromosome to be associated with SZ
Chromosome 8p21-22
What other gene variants can create susceptibility to developing SZ
NRG1
NRG3
ERBB4
Genetic makeup of […] SZ patients worldwide compared with […] controls to find […] separate genetic variations associated with an increased risk
37000
113000 controls
108 genes
(+) of genetic basis = the wealth of evidence e.g.
Tienari’s study and also:
Joseph’s review of twin studies that were carried out up to 2001 and found an overall concordance rate for MZ twins as 40% but DZ was 7.4% (concordance pretty high for MZ so supports role of genes)
(-) of genetic basis: why are adoption studies not as legit?
Nature vs nurture hard to investigate, as we can’t tell which one is affecting it
Even attempting to look at children adopted, they’re usually taken in by relatives with similar parenting styles so not always good comparisons for the effects of nature vs nurture
(-) how is the genetic explanation biologically reductionist
as it is stating that one cause of SZ is simply your genes. In other words it is insinuating that if you possess the PCM1 gene then you will have SZ. This means that this explanation is ignoring other factors such as psychological factors and family upbringing which could be more important in explaining SZ – for example it has been found that certain parenting styles (e.g. the schizophrenogenic mother) in an individuals childhood could trigger symptoms of SZ in adulthood.
(-) how does the diathesis stress model go against the genetic vulnerability
the diathesis stress model states that there is a genetic vulnerability in schizophrenia but this vulnerability is only likely to be triggered if there is a stress-trigger in the individual’s life. In other words, you may be born with a gene which makes you particularly vulnerable to SZ but if your life is relatively stress free, then you may not end up having the disorder at all. Thus we need to be cautious when looking at genetic factors since they alone may not trigger SZ. Therefore taking a more holistic perspective in understanding the causes of SZ may lead to more effective treatments rather than just focusing on genes alone.