Biological explanations of offending: Genetic & Neural Flashcards
Basic idea
There is a possibility that some of the behavioural traits associated with criminality are inherited. Also, there are significant differences in the neural structure and activity of offenders.
Christiansen (1977)
Studied 87 MZ and 147 DZ twins and found a concordance rate of 33% for MZ and 12% for DZ, suggesting a strong genetic component for criminal behaviour
Tiihonen (2014)
carried out an analysis of 900 offenders, which discovered two genetic abnormalities that may lead to criminal behaviour.
The MAOA gene
controls dopamine and serotonin therefore leads to aggression and mood imbalances. CDH13 has been linked to substance abuse and ADHD, two major predictors of criminal behaviour.
-Individuals in the study with both genes were 13 times more likely to be violent.
Diathesis stress model
says that criminality is caused by a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental/psychological triggers.
Neural explanations
A lot of research into neural explanations has focused on neural causes of conditions such as anti social personality disorder, associated with lack of empathy and impulsiveness.
The prefrontal cortex
is responsible for the regulation of emotional and pro-social behaviour therefore, it has been strongly linked to APD and so criminality.
Raine et al (2000)
studied Californian murderers and found an 11% reduction in the volume of PFC grey matter.
Keysers (2011)
found that criminals watching a film of someone in pain only felt empathy when specifically asked to, suggesting criminals’ empathy can be switched on and off (mirror neurons)
Evaluation strength: Diathesis-stress model (Mednick et al)
The criminal records of 13,000 adoptees were analysed. The group most at risk of crime were those who biological and adoptive parents had convictions (24.5%)
Evaluation weakness: problems with adoption studies
There are many extraneous variables, such as age of adoption, and the different levels of contact with the biological parent post-adoption.
Evaluation weakness: twin studies
they typically involve small samples and the twins themselves are hard to generalise to a wider population due to extraneous variables such as similar treatment.
Evaluation weakness: determinist
The notion of a ‘criminal gene’ is controversial. it raises questions of legal accountability and moral responsibility.
Evaluation weakness: reductionist
they tend to reduce the complex environmental factors and upbringing of criminals down to one or two genes.