Biological Explanation of Crime and Anti Social Behaviour. Flashcards
What is Criminological Psychology ?
Criminological Psychology refers to the application of psychological knowledge to understand crime and anti- social behaviour. This includes what causes individual to commit a crime, behaviour in a courtroom with particular reference to juries and witnesses and treatment options for offenders to reduced of them committing a crime.
Define crime ?
Crime is an act ( or omission of an act) that is against the law. Crime also implies punishment - or at least some treatment ( probation ) to reduce the likelihood of them returning to crime.
Define anti-social behaviour ?
Anti-social behaviour is a common offence and refers to behaviour that affects other people negatively. The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 defines anti-social behaviour as acting in a manner that caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress. behaving ant-socially includes being drunk and disorderly, threatening behaviour, playing loud music at night and taking drugs.
Describe the gender differences in Criminal and anti-social behaviour ?
Males are known to carry out more crimes than females. There is a significant difference between the number of males and females offenders. I the UK, the Ministry of justice published an analysis of recent data called statistics on women in the Criminal justice system (2013), this review found the approximately 80% of all offenders are male and 20% are female.
What are the 4 biological explanations of crime and anti-social behaviour we study ?
1) Brain injury
2) the role of amygdala and aggression
3) XXY syndrome
4) Eysenck 5 dimensions of personality - PEN Personality.
What does the term Brain Injury refer to ?
The term brain injury is given to any impact on brain structure that can affect its functioning. Brain injury can be categorised into acquired traumatic brain injury and non traumatic brain injury.
What is an acquired traumatic brain injury ?
Acquired traumatic brain injury (ABI) is a brain injury as a result of an external force such as a blow to the head from an accident.
What is a non traumatic brain injury ?
Non traumatic brain injuries are usually brain injuries that result from illness such as brain tumours and stroke.
How are brain injuries studied and who typically studies them ?
Brian injuries are typically studied medically by neuroscientists who look at the biological working of the brain structure. This is generally carried out using scanning techniques such as MRI, PET and CAT scans. Brain injuries are also studied psychologically by neuropsychologists who look at the cognitive functionality of brain injured patients. Case studies of brain damaged patients are used.
why is important we study brain injuries ?
Studying brain injuries enables an understanding about what parts of the brain manage cognitions and in turn behaviours. For example, if an area of the brain is injured it can impact upon the functionality of the behaviour associated with that area. This contributes greatly towards understanding what areas of the brain relate to control and management of behaviours.
How do case studies of brain damaged patients provide supporting evidence for the link between brain injury and crime ?
Case studies of brain damaged patients dating back nearly 200 years have shown how anti-social behaviour can arise from frontal lobe injury. In these case studies, damage to the frontal lobe was linked to poor impulse control, sudden outburst of temper and lack of interpersonal sensitivity. This area of the brain can therefore, be associated with decision making and impulse control. One of the most famous of these early case studies is that of Phineas Gage.
Describe the case study of Phineas Gage and it’s link to brain injury and crime ?
The case of Phineas Gage was the first documented case of a person who survived an acquired traumatic brain injury that affected their behaviour in a negative way. Phineas Gage worked as a railroad construction worker in America. Prior to the accident, Phineas was described as a likeable family man with an even temperament. Phineas accident occurred with an explosion causing an iron rod to passing through his skull and destroying the majority of his left frontal lobe. After his injury Phineas recovered physically however his personality changed as he went from a polite likeable family man to a rude irritable drunk. This provides evidence for the explanation of crime and anti-social behaviour through brain injury as after his accident Phineas Gage showed many similar characteristics of those who are likely to commit a crime.
Who carried out a extensive review on case studies linked to the frontal lobe and crime and what did they find ?
Brower and Price (2001) carried out an extensive review on many case studies that had investigated the link between the frontal lobe damage and criminal behaviour. They concluded that frontal lobe injury is associated with increase impulsive aggression. However, they did not find clear evidence that showed that frontal lobe damage could predict violent crime. As they mention one study ( Labbatte et al 1997) of two cases of adults where there was an improvement in impulsive and anti-social behaviour after frontal lobe injury.
What evidence from brain scanning provides support for the link between brain injury and crime ?
Grafman et al (1996) studied men that sustained brain injuries whilst fighting in the Vietnam War. He used brain scanning techniques and found those veterans with brain damage to the frontal lobe were more likely to be aggressive, getting into fight and arguments, than those with damage in other areas of the brain.
What is more recent research supporting the link between brain injury and criminal and anti-social behaviour ?
Williams et al (2010) investigates whether there was any link between head injuries and criminal and anti-social behaviour. He found that :
• 60% of 196 prisoners they investigated had received some form of traumatic brain injury due to falling, car accidents or sporting activities.
• Adults with brain injury were relatively younger at entry into prison systems and reported higher rates of repeat offending than those without brain injury.
They concluded that the results suggest that these injuries affect the development of temperament, social judgement and the ability to control impulses. Brain injury may also contribute to the greater level of risk taking behaviour, making it more likely an individual may become involved in antisocial activity. Therefore, impairment in areas such as frontal lobe can contribute towards the development of criminality.
What is the gender difference for Brain injury ?
Headway - The Brain Injury Association report that males are more prone to head injuries than females.
How does Evolution explain gender difference in brain injuries ?
Wilson and Daly (1985) proposed status competition as a way of explaining the evolutionary advantage of male aggression and violence. Status competition means that males will participate in risky activities such as violence even if they involve the possibility of serious injury or death. By engaging in aggressive and risky behaviours they compete for higher status than other males, increasing their chances of winning a high value mate and therefore increasing their chances of successfully reproducing. This is because, they argued, females will be attracted to aggressive risk takers as such males are displaying willingness to take risks in competition for food etc. Such risky behaviour patterns put males more at risk for acquired traumatic brain injury.
What are the strengths of brain injury as an explanation of criminal and anti-social behaviour ?
A strength of brain injury as an explanation of criminal behaviour is it can be seen that there is extensive reliable evidence from a variety of different types of studies linking brain injury and anti-social behaviour. This supporting evidence therefore provided the brain injury explanation of criminal behaviour with scientific credibility.
Additionally brain injury is a useful theory for explaining gender differences in criminal and anti-social behaviour. This is because more males experience brain injury than females and more males are involved in crime than females.
What disproving evidence is there for the link of brain injury and criminal behaviour that limits this explanation.
A weakness of brain injury as an explanation as criminal behaviour is that there is evidence against this explanation. kreutzer (1991) studied 74 prisoners with brain injuries. Most of these arrests occurred after the consumption of alcohol or illegal substances. Kreutzer concluded that they were unable to prove or disprove a cause and effect link between traumatic brain injury and violence with substance abuse, traumatic brain injury and crime all interlinked.
Furthermore Labbatte et al (1997) was a case study of two adults where there was improvements in impulsive and anti-social behaviour after frontal lobe brain injury.
What are the weaknesses of brain injury as an explanation for criminal and anti-social behaviour ?
A weakness of this explanation is that the research that underpins the theory is limited. With case studies of brain damaged patients often being dependent on one person or a small collection of people. This means the samples lack generalisability to the wider population of criminals. It should also be noted that much of the research on brain injury focuses on the link with aggression and violent crime, but not all crimes are violent e.g fraud. Once again reducing its generalisability.
Additionally research in this area has not established clear cause and effect links between brain injury and criminal behaviour. Whilst brain injury may make a person more impulsive and aggressive this does not mean they will become a violent criminal. Many variable are left uncontrolled in this field of research that could affect criminal behaviour. For example when considering the influence of brain injury in Williams et al (2010) research comorbidity must be taken into account as many offenders having s history of drug and alcohol abuse.
Furthermore the focus on brain injury as an explanation of criminal behaviour is, a reductionist way of explaining criminal behaviour. Criminal behaviour is likely to be the product of many interacting influences.
What is the Limbic system ?
The limbic system is in the mid brain and is a collection of smaller brain organ structures which are responsible for initiating or controlling emotions.
What is the Amygdala ?
The amygdala is a small almond like structure that sits within the limbic system. The amygdala is responsible for processing emotions such as happiness, anxiety, fear and aggression. When we are exposed to a threatening stimulus, our amygdala is activated and this results in an increase in arousal and emotions. This response in the brain activates responses to the stimuli through our behaviour and as a result of the amygdala being aroused a human response is to either take flight or fight and become aggressive towards the threat. The amygdala itself doesn’t produce aggression, it is connected to other parts of the brain that produce aggression. But it is necessary to initiate aggression of the flight response. Without it we wouldn’t experience the the emotional reaction associated with aggression. Additionally the amygdala has been linked to moral reasoning.
How does a faulty amygdala link to criminal and anti-social behaviour ?
If the amygdala is not functioning correctly it may lead to a higher likelihood of criminal behaviour. This may be because :
• The threshold at which the activation of the amygdala occurs is too low - resulting in sudden outbursts of unprovoked aggression, leading to assult.
• The amygdala is malfunctioning so that anxiety and fear levels are low, may lead to high levels of risk taking behaviour that may result in criminal acts.
What case study of brain damaged patients supports the explanation of aggression caused by the amygdala and its link to crime and how does it do so ?
The case study of Charles Whitman documents one of the first case studies where a criminal act was linked to the amygdala. Charles Whitman was an ex-marine who was studying engineering at the University of Texas. In the early morning hours of August 1st 1966, Whitman murdered his wife and mother in their homes. Later that day he brought a number of guns to the campus of the University of Texas and killed 14 people and injured 32 other in a mass shooting. Whitman was shot at the scene of the crimes. Following his death an autopsy was carried out and they found Whitman to have a cancerous brain tumour, approximately the size of a walnut, which was located in the limbic system and impacting the amygdala, thalamus and hypothalamus. It is believed that this brain tumour had significant effect upon his brain functioning which lead to this criminal behaviour. Although this isn’t demonstrated conclusively, this case study suggests the possible impact that the amygdala can have in criminal behaviour.
Describe recent research that links the amygdala to criminal and anti-social behaviour.
Yang et al (2009) were interested in the link between smaller volume of the amygdala and anti-social behaviour. The researchers looked at 27 psychopathic people and compared them to 27 controls and used a structural MRI scanner to measure the volume of both amygdala in each participant. They found psychopathic people had lower volume on both amygdalae compared to the controls. On average they had 17.1% lower volume in the left amygdala and 18.9% less volume in the right amygdala. There was also a significant correlation between reduced volume of the amygdalae and high psychopathy scores. They concluded that, problems with the functioning of the amygdala is involved in criminal and antisocial behaviour.
What are the strengths of the amygdala and aggression explanation of crime and anti-social behaviour ?
From the case study of Charles Whitman and the more recent research by Raine et al (1997) and Yang et al (2009) it can be seen that there is scientific evidence of the link between the amygdala and criminal and anti-social behaviour. As the research methods used to investigate this link have been objective analysis techniques such as brain scans therefore; providing the study with scientific credibility.
What are weaknesses of the amygdala and aggression explanation of of crime and anti-social behaviour ?
This explanation has limitations as the research that supports the theory is largely based upon case studies such as Charles Whitman. Case studies like these lack generalisability to the wider target population of criminals as they are based upon either one person or a very small group of people with a unique characteristic.
Additionally research into the amygdala does not explain the gender differences in criminal and anti-social behaviour. This limits the explanations usefulness.
Furthermore the research on the amygdala is reductionist since over simplifies the complexity of criminal behaviour down to one structure in the limbic system. This is problematic for two reasons firstly it is clear that other areas of the brain can be damaged or dysfunctional leading to violence and anti-social behaviour. Secondly, it overlooks social factors (nurture) that can contribute to criminal behaviour.
What’s are chromosomes ?
Chromosomes are long cooled molecules of DNA that are carried by the cells in our body contained in the nucleus of every cell.