Biological Debate Flashcards
Neuroimaging is ethical
Raine showed how they can be useful for objectively identifying criminals’ insanity plea
MRI and PET scans useful for diagnostics, treatment measuring, and investigating neurological disorders (Neurotjerapeutics ncbi 2021)
Neuroimaging is unethical
Law Biosci (2019) - 4 main areas of concern
1) obtaining and collection of genetic information
2) the disclosure of such information
3) use of the information
4) the right not to know the information
- also link back to Raine
Implications of neuroimaging being ethical
Ethical: improves quality of life for people if diseases are more understood
Social: safer societies
Implications of neuroimaging being unethical
Social: diminished responsibility for criminals and easier sentences
Neuroenhancements are ethical
Bard et al. (2018) - survey with 1000 respondents, higher efficacy of NE are linked to higher willingness to use them. But generally less need for them in settings where performance is already good.
Neuroenhancements are unethical
Farah et al. explored many common pharmacologic and electronic enhancements and their effectiveness. Concluded that they interfere with authentic resilience, pathologize negative mood, natural attention span, and forgetfulness
Implications of Bard et al (2018)’s research
Economic/Social: If people take neuroenhancements, results in harder workers and more people in higher education which improves the society and economy if they are landing high paying jobs.
Implications of Farah et al.’s research
Ethical: people who need the medication do not receive the same ‘enhancement’, and it diminishes their own efforts to live up to the same standard as non-disordered people
Neurotechnology is ethical
Fuchs (2006) - exploration of ethical issues surrounding neuroscience suggests that techniques such as DBS improve quality of life for ill people
Neurotechnology is unethical
Nueralink - concerns surrounding mind control, links to US military bases, not developed specifically to treat illness (as much as Elon tries to say it is)
Implications of Fuchs (2006) research
Economic: Improves quality of life which is also free in the UK
Implications of the Neuralink developments
Economic: priced out of access
Ethical: not used for psychological research