biological approach - research Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the context for Raine, Buchsbaum and Lacasse’s 1997 research?

A
  • theories suggested there might be a physical difference between criminals and non-criminals
  • Lombroso said that criminals have narrow, sloping foreheads, prominent eye ridges, large ears and protruding chins
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was the aim of Raine et al’s 1997 research?

A

to identify brain regions specific to offenders charged with murder or manslaughter, who had pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was the methodology of this research?

A
  • quasi experiment (IV not directly manipulated, naturally occurring/ already exists)
  • matched pair design
  • IV is not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI)
  • DV is brain difference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the experimental group of this research?

A
  • 41 murderers (39 men + 2 women)
    • mean age of 34.3
  • all had been charged with manslaughter and
    pleaded NGRI or incompetent to stand trial
  • all referred to University of California to get proof of their diminished capacity
  • were all directed to be medication-free for 2 weeks before the scan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were the results of the mental capacities of the murderers?

A
  • 6 had schizophrenia
  • 23 had a head injury or brain damage
  • 3 had a history of psychoactive drug abuse
  • 2 had an effective disorder
  • 2 had epilepsy
  • 3 had hyperactivity or a learning disability
  • 2 had a personality disorder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the control group of this research?

A

formed by matching each murderer with a normal individual of the same sex and gender
- the 6 schizophrenics were matched with 6 schizophrenics from a mental hospital
- the other controls had no history of psychiatric illness
- none were taking medication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what was the procedure of this research?

A
  1. 10 minutes before the FDG tracer injection, participants were given practice trials on a continuous performance task (CPT)
  2. 30 seconds before the injection, the task was started so that the initial task novelty would not affect the results of the PET scans
  3. the FDG tracer was injected. the FDG was taken up by the brain for a 32 minute period during which the participant completed a CPT
  4. the participant then had the PET scan where the brain was scanned for in 10 mm horizontal slices
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what was the first finding of the research?

A
  1. NGRI murderers had reduced brain activity in areas previously linked with violence such as the :
    - corpus collosum
    - left angular gyrus
    - pre-frontal cortex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the second finding of the research?

A
  1. NGRI murderers showed an abnormal asymmetry of activity (reduced activity in left hemisphere and increased in the right) in:
    - the hippocampus
    - the amygdala
    - the thalamus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the third finding of the research?

A
  1. no differences were found between the NGRI murderers and the control group in the :
    - caudate
    - putamen
    which are associated with mental illness but not violence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the other findings of the research?

A

there were no differences :
- in the performance on the CPT between murderers and the control group, which means any differences were not related to task performance
- between the 14 non-white murderers and the white murderers in the brain activity
- between murderers with a head injury and those without

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what were the conclusions of this research?

A
  • overall, the findings support pre-existing biological theories of violence
  • the areas of the brain where abnormalities have been found in the murderers may be used to explain their violent behaviour
  • however, neural processes regarding violence are complex and can’t be reduced to a single brain mechanism
    • instead, there’s disruption between interacting
      mechanisms and wouldn’t cause violent
      behaviour but would predispose an individual to
      violent behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the other conclusions of this research?

A
  • the findings can’t say that violence is determined by biology alone; social, psychological, cultural and situational factors also predispose violence
  • the research doesn’t demonstrate that NGRI murderers are not responsible for their actions, or that PET scans can be used as a diagnostic technique
  • it can’t be ruled out that head injury and IQ may be factors that contribute to the results
  • cause and effect is also an issue, all we know is that brain dysfunction is related to violence
    • it may be a violent lifestyle that causes changes
      in the brain rather than the other way around
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the evaluation of the methodology?

A

quasi experiment :
- casual relationships can’t be established as the IV hasn’t been directly manipulated
- there’s a danger that the findings could be misinterpreted and assumed that criminal behaviour is predetermined and inescapable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the evaluation of the research technique?

A

data was collected using PET scans :
- allows researchers to study the brain in detail in ways that were not previously possible
- in the past, researchers relied on post mortem
examinations
- PET scans also allow the brain to be studied in action
- this means it’s highly scientific

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the evaluation of the sample?

A

only murderers were studied as part of the procedure :
- Raine didn’t scan the brains of other criminals so it doesn’t give much insight into criminals in general
- many violent crimes don’t involve murder, e.g. robbery
- it may have been more beneficial to look at how the brains of non-violent criminals work and then compared them to violent criminals

17
Q

what is the evaluation of the procedure in this research?

A

Raine had strict procedures for this research :
- all NGRIs were matched with a control, no participants were on medication, everyone completed the same CPT and the same PET scanner
- high levels of control like this means it’s easier to determine a cause and effect relationship between variables
- repeatability and reliability means it’s more trusted and valued research

18
Q

what is the ethical issue of valid consent in this research?

A
  • NGRI suggests they may not have been mentally competent to give their valid consent
  • if they found the CPT difficult which may have lowered their self-esteem (psychological harm)
  • PET scan may have been distressing
  • may not have understood their right to withdraw, especially as they were prisoners
19
Q

what is the first social implication of this research?

A

may mean that courts can solely use biological evidence against people who are convicted of murder or manslaughter :
- if violent behaviour is innate and not learnt, people with similar brain abnormalities may be imprisoned without consideration for their social situation
- this could mean restorative justice and anger management wouldn’t be used to rehabilitate offenders
- they may just force drug treatment
or psychosurgery with no chance to
rehabilitate
- this would cost taxpayers a lot of money
-housing and feeding criminals

20
Q

what is the second social implication of this research?

A

effect on judicial system :
- if murderers are born not made, it takes away the element of free will
- if people are not to blame for their actions then we couldn’t imprison them
- society would be at risk as murderers would be able to carry on with their normal lives, risking civilians safety as criminals wouldn’t be locked up
- Raine did warn that his research should be taken at face value