Bill of Rights + Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Miranda v. Arizona

A

On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his house and brought to the police station where he was questioned by police officers in connection with a kidnapping and rape. After two hours of interrogation, the police obtained a written confession from Miranda. The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation.

The Supreme Court ruled the interrogation violated the 5th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bethel v. Fraser

A

At a school assembly of approximately 600 high school students, Matthew Fraser made a speech nominating a fellow student for elective office. In his speech, Fraser used what some observers believed was a graphic sexual metaphor to promote the candidacy of his friend. As part of its disciplinary code, Bethel High School enforced a rule prohibiting conduct which “substantially interferes with the educational process . . . including the use of obscene, profane language or gestures.” Fraser was suspended from school for two days.

The Supreme Court ruled the school has a right to discipline students for lewd speech.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright

A

Clarence Earl Gideon was charged in Florida state court with felony breaking and entering. When he appeared in court without a lawyer, Gideon requested that the court appoint one for him. According to Florida state law, however, an attorney may only be appointed to an indigent defendant in capital cases, so the trial court did not appoint one. Gideon represented himself in trial. He was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition in the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that the trial court’s decision violated his constitutional right to be represented by counsel.

The Supreme Court ruled that state courts must appoint attorneys for defendants who cannot afford their own counsel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Terry v. Ohio

A

Terry and two other men were observed by a plain clothes policeman in what the officer believed to be “casing a job, a stick-up.” The officer stopped and frisked the three men, and found weapons on two of them. Terry was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon and sentenced to three years in jail.

The Supreme Court ruled that the search was reasonable under the 4th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Loving v. Virginia

A

In 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia. The Lovings returned to Virginia shortly thereafter. The couple was then charged with violating the state’s antimiscegenation statute, which banned inter-racial marriages. The Lovings were found guilty and sentenced to a year in jail (the trial judge agreed to suspend the sentence if the Lovings would leave Virginia and not return for 25 years).

The Supreme Court ruled that the law violated the 14th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Miller v. United States

A

An Arkansas federal district court charged Jack Miller and Frank Layton with violating the National Firearms Act of 1934 (“NFA”) when they transported a sawed-off double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun in interstate commerce. Miller and Layton argued that the NFA violated their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

The Supreme Court ruled that it does not violate the 2nd Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vernonia School District v. Acton

A

An official investigation led to the discovery that high school athletes in the Vernonia School District participated in illicit drug use. School officials were concerned that drug use increases the risk of sports-related injury. Consequently, the Vernonia School District of Oregon adopted the Student Athlete Drug Policy which authorizes random urinalysis drug testing of its student athletes. James Acton, a student, was denied participation in his school’s football program when he and his parents refused to consent to the testing.

The Supreme Court ruled that the denial of participation did not violate the 4th Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Furman v. Georgia

A

Furman was burglarizing a private home when a family member discovered him. He attempted to flee, and in doing so tripped and fell. The gun that he was carrying went off and killed a resident of the home. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death (Two other death penalty cases were decided along with Furman: Jackson v. Georgia and Branch v. Texas. These cases concern the constitutionality of the death sentence for rape and murder convictions, respectively).

The Supreme Court ruled that Georgia was arbitrarily assigning the death penalty & violating the 8th & 14th Amendments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gregg v. Georgia

A

A jury found Gregg guilty of armed robbery and murder and sentenced him to death. On appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence except as to its imposition for the robbery conviction. Gregg challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, claiming that his capital sentence was a “cruel and unusual” punishment that violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

The Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty in extreme cases did not violate the 8th & 14th Amendments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Tinker v. Des Moines

A

In December 1965, a group of students in Des Moines held a meeting in the home of 16-year-old Christopher Eckhardt to plan a public showing of their support for a truce in the Vietnam war. They decided to wear black armbands throughout the holiday season and to fast on December 16 and New Year’s Eve. The principals of the Des Moines school learned of the plan and met on December 14 to create a policy that stated that any student wearing an armband would be asked to remove it, with refusal to do so resulting in suspension. On December 16, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt wore their armbands to school and were sent home. The following day, John Tinker did the same with the same result. The students did not return to school until after New Year’s Day, the planned end of the protest.

The Supreme Court ruled that the students’ protest was protected under the 1st Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

New Jersey v. TLO

A

T.L.O. was a high school student. School officials searched her purse suspecting she had cigarettes. The officials discovered cigarettes, a small amount of marijuana, and a list containing the names of students who owed T.L.O. money. T.L.O. was charged with possession of marijuana. Before trial, T.L.O. moved to suppress evidence discovered in the search, but the Court denied her motion. The Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County found her guilty and sentenced her to probation for one year.

The Supreme Court ruled that the search was reasonable under the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Kennedy v. Bremerton School District

A

Joseph Kennedy, a high school football coach, engaged in prayer with a number of students during and after school games. His employer, the Bremerton School District, asked that he discontinue the practice in order to protect the school from a lawsuit based on violation of the Establishment Clause. Kennedy refused and instead rallied local and national television, print media, and social media to support him.

The Supreme Court ruled that Kennedy’s prayers were protected under the 1st Amendment due to the timing and circumstance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke

A

Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. He was rejected both times. The school reserved sixteen places in each entering class of one hundred for “qualified” minorities, as part of the university’s affirmative action program, in an effort to redress longstanding, unfair minority exclusions from the medical profession. Bakke’s qualifications (college GPA and test scores) exceeded those of any of the minority students admitted in the two years Bakke’s applications were rejected. Bakke contended, first in the California courts, then in the Supreme Court, that he was excluded from admission solely on the basis of race.

The Supreme Court ruled that the specific instance was unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Amendment 1

A
  • Freedom of Religion
  • Freedom of Speech
  • Freedom of the Press
  • Right to Peaceably Assemble
  • Right to Petition Government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Amendment 2

A
  • Right to Bear Arms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Amendment 3

A
  • No Quartering of Soldiers in Times of Peace
17
Q

Amendment 4

A
  • Right Against Unreasonable Searches & Seizures
  • Warrants & Probable Cause
18
Q

Amendment 5

A
  • Right to Protection Against Self-Incrimination
  • Double Jeopardy
  • Due Process
  • Protection of Private Property Being Seized for Public Use Without Just Compensation
19
Q

Amendment 6

A
  • Right to a Speedy and Public Trial
  • Right to an Impartial Jury
  • Right to be Informed of Nature & Cause of Accusation
  • Right to Counsel
20
Q

Amendment 7

A
  • Right for Civil Cases to Have a Jury in Federal Court
21
Q

Amendment 8

A
  • Right Against Excessive Bail & Excessive Fines
  • Right Against Cruel & Unusual Punishments
22
Q

Amendment 9

A
  • Protection of Unnamed Rights
23
Q

Amendment 10

A
  • The Powers not Listed in Constitution go to States & the People, Not the Federal Government