Beyond Feelings Flashcards
What is the general understanding of Ruggiero’s explanation for the influence of time and place. I wont be looking at details, just a general summary of his analysis
- We exist in a particular time period in history of our species and in a particular place on this planet.
- This time and place are defined by specific circumstances, understandings, beliefs, and customs, all of which limit our experience and influence our thought patterns
- For example if we lived in America during colonial times, we would likely have had no objection to the practice of barring women from serving on jury, entering into a legal contract, owning property, or voting
- If we lived in the nineteenth century, we would have no objection to young children being denied an education and being hired out by their parents to work 16 hours a day, nor would we have given any thought to the special needs of adolescence
What is your general understanding of Ruggiero’s explanation for the influence of time and place
Living in a different age or culture would make you a different person. Even if you rebelled against the values of your time and place, they still would represent the context of your life, in other words, they still would influence your responses
Influence of Ideas: Get a clear sense of what he explains is the link between ideas expressed and the implications we may unknowingly internalize. Just a general summary
When one idea is expressed, closely related ideas are simultaneously conveyed, logically and inescapably (incapable of being escaped, ignored, or avoided). In logic, this kinship (relationship) is expressed by the term sequitur, Latin for “it follows.” (The converse is non sequitur, “it does not follow”)
The idea that many teachers and parents express to young children as a way of encouraging them: “If you believe in yourself, you can succeed at anything.” From this it follows that?
Nothing else but belief-neither talent nor hard work- is necessary for success. The reason the two ideas are equivalent is that their meanings are inseparably linked.
In addition to conveying ideas closely linked to it in meaning, an idea can imply (suggest) other ideas. For example, the idea that there is no real difference between virtue (moral excellence) and vice (immoral habits) implies that?
People should not feel bound by common moral standards. Samuel Johnson had this implication in mind when he said: “But if he does really think that there is no distinction between virtue and vice, why, Sir, when he leaves our houses let us count our spoons.
The influence of Mass Culture:
In centuries past, family and teachers were the dominant, and sometimes the only, influence on children. Today, however, the influence exerted by mass culture is?
Often greater. Mass culture is the broadcast media, newspapers, magazines, internet and popular music
By age ____ the average teenager has spent 11,000 hours in the classroom and 22,000 hours in front of the television set. He or she has had perhaps 13,000 school lessons yet has watched more than 750,000 commercials. By age _____ the same person has had fewer than 20,000 school lessons yet has watched approximately 45,000 hours of tv and close to 2 million commericials
18
thirty-five
What effects does mass culture have on us?
Modern advertising bombards public with slogans and testimonials by celebrities. This approach is designed to appeal to emotions and create artificial needs for products and services. As a result, many people develop the habit of responding emotionally, impulsively, and gullibly to such appeals. They also tend to acquire values very different from those taught in the home and the school. Ads often portray play as more fulfilling than work, self-gratification as more desirable than self-control, and materialism as more meaningful than idealism.
Mass Culture:
TV programmers use frequent scene shifts and sensory appeals such as car crashes, violence, and sexual encounters in order to?
Keep audience interest from diminishing. Then they add frequent commercial interruptions. In a dramatic program, attention shifts might include camera angle changes: shifts in story line from one set of characters to another, or from a present scene to a past scene, or to fantasy: and shifts to “newsbreaks,” to commercial breaks, from one commercial to another, and back to the program. Also included might be shifts of attention that occur within commercials.
* This manipulation has prevented many people from developing a mature attention span. They expect the classroom and workplace to provide the same constant excitement they get from tv. That is an impossible demand, and when it isn’t met they call their teacher boring and their work unfulfilling. Because such people seldom have the patience to read books that require them to think, many publishers have replaced serious books with light fare written by celebrities
The science of manipulation:
• Pay attention to the details of how historically psychology has influenced mass media;
Attempts to influence the thoughts and actions of others are no doubt as old as time, but manipulation did not become a science until the early twentieth century, when Ivan Pavlov, a Russian professor of psychology, published his research on conditioned (learned) reflexes. Pavlov found that by ringing a bell when he fed a dog, he could condition the dog to drool at the sound of the bell even when no food was presented.
The science of manipulation:
pay particular attention to the discussion of Dr. John Watson
An American psychologist John Watson was impressed with Pavlov’s findings and applied them to human behavior. In Watson’s most famous experiment, he let a baby touch a lab rat. At first, the baby was unafraid. But then Watson hit a hammer against metal whenever the baby reached out to touch the rat, and the baby became frightened and cried. in time, the baby cried not only at the sight of the rat but also at the sight of anything furry such as a stuffed animal. Watson’s work earned him the title “father of behaviorism”
John Watson’s application of behaviorist principles to advertising.
He spent the latter part of his career working for advertising agencies and soon recognized that the most effective appeal to consumers was not to the mind but to the emotions. He advised advertisers to “tell [the consumer] something that will tie him up with fear, something that will stir up a mild rage, that will call out an affectionate or love response, or strike at a deep psychological or habit need. “His attitude toward the consumer is perhaps best indicated by a statement he made in a presentation to department store executives. “The consumer is to the manufacturer, the department stores and the advertising agencies, what the green frog is to physiologist.
The Influence of Psychology (the key part of the chapter)
• Get a general grasp of the ideas of Maltz and Maslow.
Dr. Maxwell Maltz explains the amazing results one educator had in improving the grades of schoolchildren by changing their self-images. The educator had observed that when children saw themselves as stupid in a particular subject (or stupid in general), they unconsciously acted to confirm their self-images. They believed they were stupid, so they acted that way. Reasoning that it was their defeatist attitude rather than any lack of ability that was undermining their efforts, the educator set out to change their self-images. He found that when he accomplished that, they no longer behaved stupidly! Maltz concludes that from this and other examples that our experiences can work a kind of self -hypnotism on us, suggesting a conclusion about ourselves and then urging us to make it come true.
Maslow: Described the hierarchy of human needs in the form of a pyramid, with physiological needs (food and drink) at the foundation. Above them, in ascending order, are safety needs, the need for belongingness and love, the need for esteem and approval, and aesthetic and cognitive needs (knowledge, understanding, etc.). At the pinnacle is the need for self-actualization, or fulfillment of our potential. In his view, the lower needs must be fulfilled before the higher ones.
The Influence of Psychology (the key part of the chapter)
• Get a good grip on the thoughts of Viktor Frankl. Pay particular attention to the paragraph that begins with the words “Other theories might have been adopted. . .”
His theory was advanced around the same time as Maslow’s and was based on both Frankl’s professional practice and his experience in Hitler’s concentration camps. He argues that one human need is higher than self-actualization: self-transcendence, the need to rise above narrow absorption with self.
- According to him “the primordial anthropological fact [is] that being human is being always directed, and pointing to something or someone other than oneself: to a meaning to fulfill or another human being to encounter, a cause to serve or a person to love.” A person becomes fully human “by forgetting himself and giving himself, overlooking himself and focusing outward.”
- In his view making self-actualization (or happiness) the direct object of our pursuit is ultimately self-defeating; such fulfillment can occur only as “the unintended effect of self-transcendence.”
- He believes the proper perspective on life is not what it can give to us, but what it expects from us; life is daily-even hourly-questioning us, challenging us to accept “the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each of us.”
- Finding meaning involves “perceiving a possibility embedded in reality” and searching for challenging tasks “whose completion might add meaning to one’s existence” such perceiving and searching are frustrated by the focus on self: “As long as modern literature confines itself to and contents itself with, self-expression it reflects the authors sense of futility and absurdity. it also creates absurdity
Becoming an Individual
• Be sure that you can repeat the 4 guidelines he states. Be able to state (not word-for-word) the italicized sentence for each guideline and briefly explain it
1) Treat your first reaction to any person, issue, or situation as tentative (unsure). Refuse to embrace it until you have examined it.
2) Decide why you reacted as you did. Did you borrow the reaction from someone else? If possible, determine what specific experiences conditioned you to react this way.
3) Think of other possible reactions you might have had to the person, issue, or situation.
4) Ask yourself whether one of the other reactions is more appropriate than your first reaction. When you answer resist the influence of your conditioning.
Mind, Brain, or Both?
• Get a general understanding of the distinction made between mind and brain
- The left hemisphere of the brain deals mainly with detailed language processing and is associated with analysis and logical thinking. The right side deals mainly with sensory images and is associated with intuition and creative thinking, and the small bundle of nerves that lies between the hemispheres the corups callosum- integrates the various functions
- The brain is necessary for thought, but it has not shown that the brain is sufficient for thought. Many philosophers claim it can never show that. They argue that the mind and brain are different.
- The brain is a physical entity composed of matter and therefore subject to decay, the mind is a metaphysical entity
- Examine brain cells under the most powerful microscope and you will never see an idea or concept because they are not material things and so have no physical dimensions. These non material things reside in the nonmaterial mind.
Mind, Brain, or Both?
• Be sure to be able to identify the difference between competing theories about the mind being passive or active
Is the mind passive, a blank slate on which experience writes, as John Locke held, or active, a vehicle by which we take the initiative and exercise our free will, as G.W. Leibnitz argued
Critical Thinking Defined
• Understand the specifics of the difference between feeling and thinking and the relationship that both have to action (18-19)
I feel and I think are sometimes used interchangeably, but that practice causes confusion. Feeling is a subjective (existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought) response that reflects emotion, sentiment, or desire; it generally occurs spontaneously rather than through a conscious mental act. We don’t have to employ our minds to fell angry when we are insulted, afraid when we are threatened, or compassionate when we see a picture of a starving child. The feelings arise automatically.
- Feeling is useful in directing our attention to matters we should think about; it also can provide the enthusiasm and commitment necessary to complete arduous mental tasks. However it isn’t a substitute for actual thinking because it’s unreliable.
- Thinking is a conscious mental process performed to solve a problem, make a decision, or gain understanding. Whereas feeling as no purpose beyond expressing itself, thinking aims beyond itself to knowledge or action. This is not to say that thinking is infallible, yet for its shortcomings, thinking is the most reliable guide to action we humans possess.
- Feelings need to be tested before being trusted, and thinking is the most reasonable and reliable way to test them.
Critical Thinking Defined
• Be able to explicitly state the “three broad categories of thinking” and their relationship to the issue of asking probing questions (19-20)
1) Reflective
2) Creative
3) Critical: essence is evaluation. Defined as the process by which we test claims and arguments and determine which have merit and which do not. A search for answers, a quest. Most important technique is asking probing questions. Where the uncritical accept their first thoughts and other people’s statements at face value, critical thinkers challenge all ideas.
Characteristics of Critical Thinkers
• Be able to explain the major characteristics of critical thinkers. Pay special attention to the bottom of page 20 and the first 2 paragraphs of page 21.
- A number of misconceptions exist about critical thinking. One is that able to support beliefs with reasons makes one a critical thinker. Virtually everyone has reasons, however weak they may be. The test of critical thinking is whether the reasons are good and sufficient.
- Another misconception is critical thinkers never imitate others in thought or action. If that were the case, then every eccentric would be a critical thinker. Critical thinking means making sound decisions, regardless of how common or uncommon those decisions are.
- Misconception that critical thinking is synonymous with having a lot of right answers in one’s head. There’s nothing wrong with having right answers, of course. But critical thinking involves the process of finding answers when they are not so readily available.
- Misconception critical thinking cannot be learned, one either has it or not. On contrary, critical thinking is a matter of habit. The most careless, sloppy thinker can become a critical thinker by developing the characteristics of a critical thinker. Not all people have equal thinking potential but rather everyone can achieve dramatic improvement.
Characteristics of Critical Thinkers pg.21
1) The test of critical thinking is whether the reasons are good and sufficient.
2) Critical thinking means making sound decisions, regardless of how common or uncommon those decisions are.
3) critical thinking involves the process of finding answers when they are not so readily available.
4) critical thinking is a matter of habit
5) Skill in asking appropriate questions
6) Control of one’s mental activities
Characteristics of Critical Thinkers
• Starting on page 21 you will find two opposite descriptors one labeled “Critical Thinkers. . .” and the other “Uncritical Thinkers. . .” Be sure that you can identify and explain the 7 characteristics of Critical Thinkers found on pages 21 and 22.
Critical thinkers…
1) Are honest w/themselves acknowledge what they don’t know, recognize their limits, are watchful of own errors
2) Regard problems and controversial issues as exciting challenges
3) Strive for understanding, keep curiosity alive, remain patient w/complexity, ready to invest time to overcome confusion
4) Base judgments on evidence rather than personal preferences, deferring judgment whenever evidence is insufficient. They revise judgments when new evidence reveals error
5) Interested in other’s ideas, willing to read/listen to others even when they disagree
6) Recognize that extreme views are seldom correct, they avoid them, practice fairmindedness, seek balanced view
7) Practice restraint, control feelings rather then being controlled by them, think before they act
Uncritical Thinkers…
1) Pretend they know more than they do, ignore their limits, assume their views are error-free
2) Regard problems and controversial issues as nuisances or threats to their ego
3) Impatient w/complexity thus would rather remain confused than make an effort to understand
4) Base judgements on first impressions and gut reactions. Unconcerned about amount of quality of evidence and cling to their views steadfast.
5) Preoccupied w/themselves & their opinion that they won’t pay attention to others views. At first sight of disagreement they tend to think “how can I refute this?”
6) Ignore need for balance & give preference to views that support theirs
7) Follow feelings and act impulsively
Characteristics of Critical Thinkers
• See paragraph on page 22 after the characteristics comparison and be sure to be able to explain how that paragraph defines “effective thinkers.”
Critical thinking depends on mental discipline. Effective thinkers exert control over their mental life, direct their thoughts rather than being directed by them, and withhold their endorsement of any idea-even their own- until they have tested and confirmed it. John Dewey equated this mental discipline w/freedom. He argued that people who do not have it are not free persons but slaves to whim or circumstance.
The Role of Intuition
• Be able to define intuition (22).
Commonly defined as immediate perception or comprehension of something-that is, sensing or understanding something without the use of reasoning.