Beneficiary Principle & Unincorp asso Flashcards
Why are trusts for purely private purposes generally void?
Lack a beneficiary → no one to enforce the trust and also traps money.
What is the beneficiary principle?
Idea that trust must have someone to perform it/enforce it and someone that owns trust property in equity at all times
→ Addresses the policy concerns that prop. always have an owner capable of contribution to economy
Reasons purely private trusts fail
→ Infringing rule against inalienability of capital - needs to be able to come to an end / money move
→ Vagueness - purpose must be defined
→ Capricious (irrational)
Re Astor’s ST 1952
A gift can be made to persons (incl corporations) but cannot be made to a purpose or to an object - unless charitable
Re Shaw (1957)
New alphabet - held trust purely for private purpose
Was CAPRICIOUS
Exceptions to rule against private purpose (trusts of imperfect obligation - Re Endacott)
→ Erection/maintenance of tombs or monuments - Musset v Bingle
→ Care/maintenance of specific animals (horses + hounds) - Re Dean - limit 21 years
→ Saying of masses - Bourne v Keane
→ Fox hunting (now banned under Hunting Act 2004) - Re Thompson
How to circumvent rule against against private purpose trusts
- Create a company with object clause corresponding to intended purpose
- Donation to unincorp asso with matching purpose
- Make a gift to a charity with desired purpose - won’t fail - cy-pres - will find matching charitable purpose → Re Tyler - shiny monument
- Draft as a trust which is limited to a suitable perpetuity period with expressed purpose and that benefits individuals → Re Bowes
- Outright gift with expressed motive → Re Osoba
- Use letter of wishes → popular with offshore trusts (must be beneficiary)
Re Bowes (1896)
Suitable perpetuity period, directly benefit individual, expressed purpose
‘I leave money for planting trees on this estate’ - people in charge said already lots of trees - use money for road? Go to court and say trees are absolutely necessary. Judge said purpose is only a suggestion, can’t be a trust for planting of trees but for the people.
→ The expressed purpose of planting trees was not intended to be imperative, was an indicator of testator’s motive for creating a trust for benefit of estate owners
→ Estate owners able to bring trust to an end using Saunders v Vautier
Re Tyler
Outright gift to charity with expressed ‘incentive’ → monument wanted to be kept shiny forever - law limits to 21 years, but charities never die. Income from pot of money until statue starts to look messy/unclean
What is an unincorporated association ?
Clubs/societies
Non-charitable asso in a trust pure for private purposes of asso → No legal status/personality
Re Recher’s WT
Deceased gave a share of residue to ‘The Anti-Vivisection society’. Society had been dissolved so gift could be construed as a gift to the members of a different association and therefore failed. Void - no beneficiary
→ Gift ceased to exist by time testatrix died
4 ways to gift property to unincorp asso
- Abso gift to present members of asso as joint tenants
→ Can sever share. Better to give as gift - no perpetuity, and available now - Absolute gift to the present members of the association to hold subject to the contractual bond between them
- Gift on trust for present members of asso
→ If also for FUTURE members - need to limit to perpetuity period. Can bring trust to end only if you are a B. Money can get stuck with future members too so limit to 21 years - Donation made to an agent subject to ‘mandate’ → cannot be set up in will, either give prop away in will OR a mandate
Neville Estates Ltd v Madden & others
Money can be given to an individ but contract/club constitution bind them all together, money has to be used as whole club. If you leave you cease to be an abso owner
→ As joint tenants you can sever shares
Re Grant’s WT
May be something in contract which precludes members from taking subject matter. Clause in constitution contract: spend money as long as giver of gift agrees. If contract says can only spend with permission or bring club to an end with permission, not a FREE contract - cash trapped, not valid. Need to be able to bring to an end.
Re Turkington
Every member was a beneficiary and trustee so could bring trust to an end