Behavioural ecology Flashcards
Clown fish sex change
breeding pair plus sub male
female dies, big male become female (females bigger than males)
sub male can’t do anything before this situation because lives in their anemone (reproduction limited by ecology)
link between size and fecundity
Blue-headed Wrasse sex change
Thallassoma bifasciatum
females have lower max RS but will always have some
good males have high RS, bad none
better to bide time as a female until big enough to compete as male
Angler fish mating
extreme ecology leads to extreme mating system
males attach to females and merge bloodstream, some male organs dissolve
females can have multiple
Cory mating (Callichthyidae- armoured catfish)
‘classic T position’
female drinks sperm which pass through digestive tract and deposited into pouch with eggs
male sperm have to survive digestive tract therefore costly for males, they run out of sperm before females run out of eggs
Seahorse mating system
males invest more in young care therefore males are choosier
Macaque mate choice
Young males will try to look after young of others to show good father
=competitive altruism
Baboon offspring survival
Increased for females with stronger social relationships (maybe other females less aggressive?)
Vampire bat reciprocal altruism
Females regurgitate blood for others who haven’t fed in a while (have v high metabolism need lots of food)
Later reciprocation
Hermaphroditic flatworm
Pseudoceros bifurcus
fight with penises over which one assumes male role in mating
each wants to be male because less effort
winner will puncture body cavity of the other and will be male, can mate again more quickly
the loser has to recover puncture before remating
Pinniped mating systems
Species which haul out on beaches will have greater density of mating individuals, increased chance for males to command big harems in comparison to species which haul out of ice (can go anywhere), therefore more likely monogamous
Testing female choice in long-tailed widowbird
Andersson, 1982
Male birds have ~1m long tails
Modified male tails: unmanipulated, cut and add longer, cut and stick back on, shorten
Longest had most nests, shortened had reduced
Sage warbler songs
“acoustic peacock’s tail”
males with most complex song mate earlier in season
females in cages react more strongly to more complex playbacks
Vogelkop Bowerbird male attraction
males create weaved twig huts and decorate with flowers, fruit, dung etc
remove decorations, don’t attract as many females
signal of genetic quality: sensory and motor capabilities. Can collect and defend effectively
Peacock eyespot experiment
Petrie, 1994
Semi-wild population in Wipsnade
8 males with varying number and area of eyespots, allocate ~40 females at random for mating
eggs raised by chickens
males with greater mean eyespot area had more surviving offspring two years on
Gray tree frog experiment
Hyla versicolor
Welch et al., 1998
females prefer males with long calls
experimentally fertilise female eggs with sperm from males with different call lengths
offspring sired by long-calling males produced tadpoles 2x as fit as those with short calls
Dung fly study
Geoff Parker (1970)
females often mate with several males
females store sperm in spermathecae
sperm competition (sexual selection continues post mating)
explains mate guarding, frequent copulating behaviour, mate plugs and testis size
Sperm competition in primates
Chimpanzees- polygynandrous
multiple males, competition for mating when female into oestrus (sexual swellings)
females mate with many males
testes nearly as big as brains
Gorillas- polygynous
single male controls group and has sole paternity
Drosophila melanogaster sexual conflict
male accessory proteins (Acps) with sperm
harmful to females, cause increased egg laying rate and decreased ability to remate
females mating with genetically engineered males lacking Acps or males with external genitalia ablated survive ~1 week longer
Selection experiments, intense sexual selection line and none (by enforced monogamy) line
Remove sexual selection, females survive longer- males don’t use as many Acps and don’t mate as frequently
Mate females from monogamous line with males from sexually selected line, females do less well than those in the line, have evolved decreased defences
Antagonistic coevolution
Water strider sexual conflict
Gerris spp.
males grasp females to mate
mating multiple times costly to females because decreases mobility so decreases feeding success and increases predation
females get enough sperm in one mating to last life
but males compete
males adapt to increase grasping abilities- armament on abdomen
females have increased spine length in these pops to resist mating
diff pops have different levels of armament (differences in benefits and costs?), and corresponding spine length (coevo)
Red-winged blackbird EPCs
20% of a males RS through EPCs
Effect of EPCs on offspring success in Blue tits and coal tits
Blue tits- offspring from EPCs more successful- but small sample size
coal tits- 3000 chicks form 400 broods (larger)- no difference found
But could be due to seasonal effects- females seek more EPCs later in season so maybe offspring of these at advantage when resources scarce
Antechinus polyandry
semelparous marsupial
experiment:
monandrous females- mate with same male 3x
polyandrous female- mate once with 3 males
polyandrous female had better RS
certain monogamous did as well (those with high quality males)
polyandry therefore increases chances of good genetic sire
Collard flycatcher EPC experiment
remove female from nestbox for an hour during fertile period
male thinks EPCs and decreases paternal care
therefore is tradeoff for females
Effect of attractive mate on offspring fitness in crickets
Less attractive males produce more fit daughters
More attractive males produce more fit sons
Do females need to temper mate choice to ensure all offspring fit?
Bias sex ratio in collard flycatchers
Females heterogametic - WZ
Can potentially control sex ratios of offspring
Females mated to males with larger forehead patches (more attractive) have ratio biases towards sons
Experimentally increase patch size- female has more sons
Dungfly paternity (& insects generally)
Double mating experiments
2nd male gets 80% parentage (displaces first males sperm from storage sacs)
therefore mate guarding
Female sperm choice in field crickets
Used genetic markers to look at sperm storage when females doubly mated with a different combos of nonsib and sib
when both males sib- inbreeding depression
when at least one nonsib, female bias in favour of choosing sperm of nonsib (less likely to store sib sperm)
Stalk eyed fly runaway selection
females prefer males with longer eyespan
selection lines in lab for 13 generations- select only for eyespan
female preference coevolved with it
clear genetic correlation
Chase away selection in ducks
penis driven by lymphatic system, inflates inside of females and corkscrew shaped
female reproductive tract also coiled
spirals are in different direction to make it harder to males to inseminate
increasing phallus length drives greater number of female coils and an increased number of pouches(dead ends) in reproductive tract
Brennan et al., 2007
Swordtail characin cost of resisting male charms
Kolm et al., 2012
males have long extensions to operculum with blob on the end to attract females
blob shape reflects food preferences in females
eg. forest pond, ant shaped
eg. open pond, beetle shapes
higher proportion of ants in diet, greater shape similarity of ants and lure
females fed ants in lab direct more bites at male ant shaped lures than those fed other things
potentially too costly for females to resist lures because could compromise foraging success
Chase away selection in swordtail fish
female preference for sword tails stronger in species that lack swords
suggests that males evolved swords to exploit pre-existing female preference
but as they evolved, female preference decreased
Natterjack toad inferior male tactic
loudest shouts best at attracting females
small males can’t shout loud enough
=satellites, sit near calling male and try and get female when she arrives
usually get ~50% of matings
therefore, should decide to parasitise neighbour if calling 2x as loud as you
90% of decisions as predicted by this
Dung beetle male tactics
Onthophagus
large males with horns
small males look like females
which phenotype depends flexible developmental programme- depends on size and how much food as larva
horned males guard nests with female inside
small males dig into nest in attempt to sneak matings
switch point at ~5mm pronotum width
laboratory experiments show that threshold size for switch can be changed via selection
select smaller sized, decrease threshold and vice versa
European earwig male strategies and ecological conditions
2 male morphs- large forceps (better at fighting) and small forceps
UK mainland, almost all small forceps
UK islands, greater proportions with big forceps
allometric sigmoidal relationship-switch at a certain body size
island switch size is lower due to higher population density- greater payoff for fighting even at smaller size
Alternative strategies in scale eating cichlids
2 strategies: mouth twisted left, or twisted right
2 morphs present in 7 different species
ESS= 50:50 proportion, because each host has two sides
Human handedness strategies
10-13% population left handed
left-handed, very slightly lower life expectancy
left handed people have slight advantage in fights because rarer opponent harder to defend against
eg. higher proportion of boxing champions left handed than predicted by chance
Frequency dependent selection in figwasps
Fighting males with big jaws
dispersing males with wings
If all males fighters, good to be disperser because could mate with all females that emerge from fig that didn’t include fighter wasp
& vice versa
3 genetic strategies in male Ruffs
Philomachus pugnax
dark ruffs- territorial, attract females
white ruffs- sneak matings at edges of others’ territories
female mimics (only recently discovered)
Don’t know equilibrium between because disperse, can’t tell mating success
3 genetic strategies in side-blotched lizards
males:
orange throats- guard many females
yellow throats- sneaks, look like females
blue throats- guard one female
oranges to best when high blue
yellow do best when high orange
blue do best when high yellow
no equilibrium in wild, cycle between differing proportions
can’t change tactics in this eg. because morphological specialisations
Golden eye ducks female tactics/ strategy
nest in woodpecker holes in trees, chicks jump out when hatch
some females parasitise nest and lay eggs in someone else’s
experimental tracking of chicks- can tell whose eggs are whose because characteristic shape
Tag chick feet just prior to hatching to track
Reproductive success tracking suggests that represents strategy not a tactic, because equilibrium value of 17% of eggs are parasitic (no sig. diff. from 20%, as predicted by equilibrium modelling)
But females don’t stick to same role throughout life- there may be a genetic propensity for one over another- does it depend on other individuals in pop?
Potentially LRS of parasite better- don’t have to care or guard box
Dunnock mating system
Prunella modularis
have different mating systems:
Polygyny, female RS= 3.8 per season, male= 7.6
Monogamy, female=5.0, male=5.0
Polyandry, female= 6.8, alpha male= 4.1, beta male= 2.7
Polyandry best for females, will solicit matings with any new males they encounter
Monogamy better for females than polygyny, fights between females for full territory
Polygyny best for males, try to stop females fighting, and in polyandry, alpha consistently trying to chase off beta in polyandry
Often see polyandry in dense vegetation
Polyandry in Dunnocks
females wants equal chances of paternity from her chicks- 50:50, increases amount of paternal care chicks receive
Normally, female tries to increase mating with beta to reach ratio
If alpha male experimentally removed for period of time, will mate more with him when he’s returned
Males can’t distinguish own chicks, therefore use mating share as indirect cue of paternity
If beta mates, he will care
Even if experimentally reduced brood to 1
No paternity markers- chicks and mothers don’t want them, because they would reduce amount of care given (genetic suppression by both chicks and mothers?)
Cooperative brood care in monogamous birds
Houston-Davies model- “sealed bids”- evo game where efforts fixed and optimal investment of each carer reached over evo time
Individual’s best effort in reaction to partners effort decreases with shallow gradient and partner puts in more effort
4 different outcomes:
ESS- stable equilibrium between two optimal
ESS- male sole carer
ESS- female sole carer
Unstable - overcompensation of one, depending on starting effort
eg. starlings
together, male provides 12 feeds per hour, female 13
weigh down female, she provides only 7, male provides 14
weigh down male, he provides 7, female provides 15
Incomplete compensation- are they responding to partner’s reduced effort or indirectly via increase in chick begging?
Great Tits feeding chicks (cooperative brood care)
broadcast extra begging calls from speaker at nest box
ensuring that playback didn’t affect actual chick begging
increased calls = increased parental effort
playback to one of the two, ensuring not heard by other partner, both increase effort (more feeds per hour)
both chick begging, and what other partner is doing affects care
Superb fairy wren EPCs
males have iridescent feathers
76% young sired by EPCs
social monogamy, with previous offspring as helpers
Extra males bring yellow petals to female when in fertile period
Females go to territories of other males in early morning to copulate
5% of the males in a pop get 50% of matings
1 “super stud” has sired 450 out of 1800 chicks genetically profiled
females with many helpers- more EPCs, they will care for young even if male detects
Tasmanian native hen altruism
Tribonyx mortierii
Dominant male allows subordinate bother to copulate- more offspring can be raised (9.6 compared to 6.6 with a pair) with three parents helping
Whereas is subordinate alone LRS = 0
Because brothers, r=1/5, greater benefit to alpha male to keep brother because larger genetic profit from altruism than selfishness
Fraternal polyandry in humans in Ladak, Tibet
Can raise 5.2 children with polyandry compared to 3.75 with monogamy
Hamilton’s rule, dominant brother should share wife if
3/4 N2 > N1
Here 3.9 > 3.75 BUT very close
Under harsh conditions, may pay to have younger brother around, help increase farming productivity, enables more children, might offset paternity loss
Is female in control- for her advantageous as long as N2>N1
Importance of culture eg. Buddhists permit polyandry, but Hindus and Muslims don’t
Florida Scrub Jay kin selection
Young stay at home and help parents raise future broods
Seychelles warbler kin selection
Brood sizes v small (1 or 2)
Live only on Cousin Island
Pair of breeders raise 0.8 young to dependence each year, with a helper, 1.2
Stay because full habitat on island (ecological constraint) and indirect fitness gain
Translocation of birds to nearby Aride Island
within weeks, birds breed and pops expand, no helping
As habitat begins to fill up, start to have helpers again
DNA profiles show that 40% chicks are sired by EPCs
and female helpers lay some eggs
female helpers only care if their mother is present - she produces 85% of the chicks in a nest, therefore if she is present, helpers probably related to chicks (0.85x0.85=0.72)
But only 60% of chicks are produced by primary male, so if just he is present, chances of being related to chicks is 0.6x0.6=0.36
Long tailed tit kin recognition
Live in clans of 30 plus- breeding parents plus their sons and immigrant wives
at a point in the season, split into pairs to breed
magpie predators can destroy nests, if no time to rebuild, will go to help other nearby pairs (immigrant females won’t help though, because no kin)
16/17 choices, sons chose close kin to help over unrelated individuals
Recognise by signature calls of family (learnt from parents/carers)
broadcast churr calls, approach kin calls, and reply aggressively to non-kin
Ruby spot damselfly eavesdropping
Hetaerina Americana
Grether & Grey (1996)
male bright red spot at base of wing=sexual signal
But makes easier for prey to detect and avoid it (conspicuous)
Catch and manipulate females, though with red spots added had lower relative gain rate, even when controlled for age and size
Grass anole head bobbing displays
Fleishman, 1992
Anolis auratus
territorial males defend with head bobbing display, bright dulap pulses in and out
visually striking and attracts other males’ attentions
to maximise detectability, bob at high frequency different to that of background tree/leaf movement
Vine snake cryptic movement patters
Mimics background movement eg. branch in wind, similar f to background, harder for prey to detect
Narrow mouthed toads character displacement
2 species in different Southern US states
1 zone found together
mate attraction by calling
G. olivacea higher f than G. caroliensis
in sympatric overlap zone, diff in f exaggerated to minimise confusion, G. caroliensis lowers call f
Antbird song character displacement
Neotropical suboscines (innate, not complex songs) Sympatric species tend to have greater character displacement in song that allopatric species selection against inappropriate mating
Antithesis principle in dogs
Different behaviours are as maximally distinct as possible- hostile vs affectionate, change in tail/ears/back/face etc, greatest contrast
North American Wren song stereotypy
Most species repeat the same song multiple times
Three species (Short and long-billed marsh wren and rock wren) don’t repeat consistently, switch rapidly between song types, larger repertoires
These three live in habitats where there aren’t many other bird species and not much noise- where species recognition poses few problems
Redundancy in Jackson’s widowbird mating signals
Long tail, jumping display, courtship bower
Anole head bobbing alerting components
Spontaneous assertion display grabs attention of receiver with high amplitude and frequency movements (little information, no pattern), before moving onto informative display
Ord & Stamps (2008)
robot programmed to have:
-no display
-alert component and typical display or
-alert component and novel display
recorded receiver responses:
-in bright light and at close distance, no difference in time it takes for robot to get attention
-in dim light, takes longer when there was no alert
Plus, lizards in dimmer conditions and environments with more background noise, tend to increase rate of alert components
Warbler plumage and habitat
8 species in forests of Kashmir
small and green
vary in amounts of ornamentation (bright plumage patches) across species
patches play role in male individual territory defence
high patch size and number means larger territory size
(number of patches and the total reflectance at the feather tip is lower in higher light areas, when controlling for phylogenetic effects)
Colour patterns in guppies depending on environment
Male colour patches have different levels of conspicuousness in different levels of light to predators and other guppies
eg. prawns don’t detect orange well, therefore guppies often orange when prawns around, but less orange if fish is main predator
Nestling mouth colours
Davies & Kilner , 1998
gape colour in passerine chicks varies with light at nest
(red in reed buntings, yellow in robins)
Darker nest= wider mouth flanges that are whiter and less densely coloured relative to mouth, but mouth didn’t change colour (increasing contrast, more detectable)
Golden-collared mannequin background modification
males golden colour with black crown and back, display to olive females
creates display court, clears away leaves, helps show off plumage by increasing contrast with forest floor
Uy & Endler, 2004, colour and brightness contrast of golden patches greater against cleared court than adjacent leaf litter
Asian whistling thrushes UV signals
look deep blue-black but reflect UV strongly, therefore brightly coloured to conspecifics (mammals can’t see)
evolved because of habitat- high altitude forested streams and gorges that receive high levels of skylight rich in UV wavelengths, but nest and forage on ground so pays to be cryptic to mammalian predators
Honey bee waggle dance
female workers recruit others to food resource
figure of 8 and waggles abdomen in centre on vertical wax plane
angle of centre part of dance to vertical = angle between sun and direction of food source from hide
duration and intensity of waggle informs on distance and resource value
fully cooperative behaviour
Bolas spider chemical lure
pheromonal lure that mimics female sex attractant of moths, spiders catch and eat male moths that arrive
Motion sensitivity in jumping spider
Maevia indemens
2 male morphs: dark bodied and striped
have different courtship and display at different differences
dark morphs raises itself and front legs up
striped flattens self
females don’t seem to prefer either morph, approach first male to move
Fiddler crab sensory biases
Uca beebei (Christy, 1988) in a number of species, males build vertical pillar next to burrow exploits bias for crabs to detect things that break line of horizon(hide from predators in) eyes have narrow vertical pseudopupils where ommatidia densely packed = superior visual activity in vertical plane
experimentally, vertical rectangular shapes more consistently elicit spontaneous approach than horizontal rectangles of equal area
Christy et al., 2003
arena with male burrows, some pillars are removed
female approaches pillars in mating context
females also run towards pillars when scared by predator (sensory bias evolved in non mating context)
this bias also seen in predator situation for species that don’t use pillars (mating preference before trait evolution)
Aversion to aposematic colours in domestic chicks
Rowe et al., 1996
offered rtificially coloured food, one colour made distasteful
when pyrazine odour present, even at beginning of experiment, do better when learning to avoid brightly coloured than duller coloured
biased against bright colours even when not distasteful
Motion sensitivity in water mite
Neumani papillator
Proctor, 1991&92
‘courtship trembling’
ambush predators, grab prey items when detect water vibrations
males approach waiting females and vibrate water so she grabs him and sees potential mate
females deprived of food more likely to orient to and clutch vibrating males
nuptial gifts in nursery web spider
Stalhandske, 2002
Pisaura mirabilis
male provides silk wrapped prey item to mate
gift mimic female egg sac, which she has propensity to protect and carry around
males take advantage of this instinct?
Experiment:
paint courtship gifts to be as white as egg sacs (normally darker than them), latency of female to grab it reduced the brighter it gets
Túngara frog calls
Engystomops pustulosus
Ryan & Rand, 1993
calls have chucks and whines
individual males have own calls
different related species have different versions of call- all have basic ‘whine’ with specific additions
splice together different call elements of different species’ calls
females have preference for different elements
different species take advantage of ancestral female preference (perhaps one broad ranging bias?)
Crickets pre-existing preference for nuptial gifts
provisioning of food gift eg. spermatothylax (elaboration of spermatophore that contains sperm), eating spermatothylax by female increases time the ampulla is attached to her and transferring sperm
therefore bigger gift = more sperm
suggested that preference for gifts evolved in common ancestor predating evo of gift giving– not all species crickets have gifts but some appear to have preference
experiment:
artificially supply spermatophylax for specis who don’t normally have
when present, spend more time eating and more time before she removes sperm ampulla, and less sperm left it in after
Pre-existing biases in swordtail fish
Basolo 1990, 1995
investigating female preference for sword on males in related fish
female choose males with longer tails in green swordtail
attach sword to southern platyfish (closely related but no tails), female preferred
therefore preference must have evolved first in common ancestor
but new molecular data suggest with revised phylogeny that either evolved together and tail first (Mayer et al., 1994)
Therefore unsure
Mexican house finches honest colouration
Mill et al., 2002
males have red plumage, determined by carotenoids and therefore indicating information about foraging success and nutritional condition (most animals cannot make carotenoids)
males in population vary in colour intensity, poor quality males have less colour
mate choice experiment, females prefer most intense colours- conveys honest information, gives fitness benefits to female
brighter red males moult earlier and grow feather more quickly, and have higher carotenoid concentration in gut
Thompson’s Gazelle stotting
FitzGibbon & Fanshawe, 1988
vertical jumping as a pursuit deterrent
predator approach => stotting rather than running straight away
predators choose gazelle with worst stot
more vigorous stotting = better condition and harder to run down (reliable info about stamina and endurance)
Chick begging as honest signal
Magpie- Pica pica
Redondo & Castro, 1992
high pitched calling and brightly coloured gape in some birds
amount of begging in magpie = honest signal of nutritional need
greater time since fed to satiation, greater gape area and rate of calling (higher to older chicks)
parental visit and feeding rates both increase when more chicks added or playback of more chicks added
honest because cost of begging
But McCarty, 1996 “the energetic cost of begging is surprisingly low”
But measured energetic costs and not costs to fitness- need to actually know how begging costs affect growth
Cost of wolf spider drumming
Mappes et al, 1996
Production cost
attract females by drumming abdomen on ground (tiring)
manipulate intensity with which males drum by exposing them to many for few females
encourage to drum more = lose weight more quickly and lower fraction survive, therefore clear fitness cost
males of low weight and low natural drumming intensity don’t survive long in high drumming treatment
Cost of swallow tail streams
Hirundo rustica
Maintenance cost
male streamers for mate choice
but aerodynamic cost
measured performance in a flight maze after tail manipulation
tail has costs- typical streamers exceed aerodynamically optimal length by approx. 12mm
Spotted bowerbird bower destruction
Chlamydera maculata
Madden (2002)
corridor of twigs with court infront
females prefer solanum berries, therefore males collect many
manipulate by adding berries = elicits more aggressive attacks and stealing from other males (can’t maintain bower with too many berries)
when offered free supply of berries, number of berries they had at start positively correlated with how many they take
appears to assess social standing in relation to neighbours and modulates display accordingly
Black kite nests
Sergio et al., (2011)
territorial
decorate nests w eg. plastic waste
old and young individuals have few nest ornaments
middle aged have the most and more likely to take free offered ornaments
nest decoration correlates with trespassing on territory by ‘floaters’
manipulate nest by adding ornaments, individuals in prime of life can defend off increased attack rate but others cant deal with increased aggression
Pheromones in tiger moths
Utetheisa ornatrix
Dussord et al., 1991
male sex attractants
during mating, male transfers chemicals n seminal fluid (toxic alkaloids) too female, who incorporates them into eggs (protects) - female wants males that provide lots of chemicals
pheromone similar chemical composition to described chemical- therefore = informative of quality of how much alkaloid male can provide
selection for reliability
(males also want to provide alkaloids to offspring- therefore amount released relative to overall amount available)
Variation in passerine chick begging volume
Strategic
Increased extra pair paternity -> in nest with half sibs
selected to be more selfish and misrepresent hunger
louder begging for food
feeding and sexual response in Goodeine fish
Garcia & Ramirez, 2005
terminal yellow band on male tails, looks like worm when moved
elicits feeding response in females (exploitation of feeding bias in mating context)
more elaborate band decreases feeding response but sexual response remains (because costly and therefore honest signal - males and females with yellow bands suffered more damage confined to area of band when kept in outdoor ponds)
Therefore initial evolution was exploitative but has become honest
Cuckoo low frequency exploitation
eg. in reed warbler nest
as cuckoo grows, gape increases, but doesn’t grow more than overall gape size of al other chicks in nest
therefore compensated by begging more intensely for a given level of hunger (Kilner et al., 1999)- have no genetic interest in future RS of adoptive parents
Parents attend to begging calls- cuckoo parasitisation sufficiently rare that still pays to attend chick begging
Mantis shrimp deception
Adams & Caldwell (1990)
continues to display threat displays to repel intruders entering burrow, even when just moulted and unable to fight effectively
intruders do best to respect signal, because in most cases represents real threat
Cleaner wrasse
Stations where larger fish/ turtles come to have parasites cleaned from gills
have local client fish with small territories and free ranging fish which have multiple options of cleaning stations they could visit
cleaners would prefer to eat the mucus and scales of clients (Grutter and Bshary, 2003)
but if take a bite= lose a client, bad for rest of cleaner group
more likely to cheat and take a bite out of local fish, because they have no choice of cleaning station
Cleaners often work in pairs, number of mechanisms to reduce cheating eg. partner switching, punishment plus threat of reciprocity by client
2 different, unfixed strategies of cleaners:
- low interest in small clients and rarely cheat larger clients
- small minority cheat large non-predatory clients with 6x higher frequency (Bshary, 2002)
cheaters give tactile stimulation with their fins, lowers basal and acute cortisol levels in clients- use to build new relationships with clients, to reconcile after cheating and as a pre-conflict management strategy with predators
Observation of a cleaning interaction without conflict attracts new larger clients, so tactile stimulation of smaller fish can falsely entice larger that are then bitten to obtain mucus
Injection of fish with cortisol or blocking of their glucocorticoid receptors increases this ‘cheater’ behaviour (Soares et al., 2014)
Vervet monkey alarm calls
semantic communication in nonhuman animals
acoustically different alarm calls to different predators
each call causes different, seemingly adaptive responses
Monkeys on the ground respond to leopard alarms by running into trees, to eagle alarms by looking up, and to snake alarms by looking down
Seyfarth et al., 1980
played recordings of alarm calls in absence of predators and observed responses
alarm length, amplitude and alarmist’s age/sex class had little effect on response quality
But, calls similar sounding in aggressive context
eg. overlap between female calls given to snakes, eagles and during aggression
eg. male barks in leopard and aggressive contexts
Price et al., 2015
semantic properties of alarm calls bear little resemblance to human words, but acoustic variation, possibly with additional contextual information, allows listeners to select appropriate responses
Complex communication in orcas
field observations of killer whales have documented the existence of group-differentiated vocal dialects that are often referred to as traditions or cultures and are hypothesized to be acquired non-genetically
Abramson et al., 2018
subjects were able to make recognizable copies of all familiar and novel conspecific and human sounds tested and did so relatively quickly
suggests vocal variants observed in natural populations of this species can be socially learned by imitation
Mammalian large brain size evolution
All three ‘peaks’ of large brain size evolution in mammals (odontocetes (esp. dolphins and sperm whales), humans and elephants) shared a common selective environment: extreme mutual dependence based on external threats from predators or conspecific groups
In this context, social competition, and consequently selection for greater cognitive abilities and large brain size, was intense.
Tandem running in rock ants
Form of teaching (fulfils all requirements)
Tandem leaders know food location, tandem followers naïve
leader only continued the tandem run when frequently tapped on her legs and abdomen by followers antenna
The tandem leader therefore modifies its behaviour in the presence of the follower
Imposes cost on leader because can move 4 times faster without follower- tandems slowed by frequent pauses where follower loops round, probably in search of landmarks (speed of run higher in presence of conspicuous landmarks than when absent)
Followers found food more quickly when tandem running than when foraging alone
Bidirectional feedback between the leader and follower is evident from their patterns of acceleration and deceleration as a function of the strength of the stimuli they present to one another- when gap between them too large, leader slows and follower speeds up
Lessons learned by followers transferred when they become leaders for others- therefore propagates time-saving knowledge between individuals
Bidirectional feedback distinguishes it from broadcasting in other ant species (eg. pheromone trails)- effective in big groups
teaching works better in smaller societies, where info is valuable and easily lost
(big brain is not a prerequisite of teaching)
Great Tit care depending on clutch size
David Lack- add or remove eggs
Parents provide less food per offspring to enlarged broods- reduces offspring mass and survival (survival to 1 year reduced in enlarged clutches) - Smith et al., 1989
Parents act at optimal rate of feeding in each treatment