Behavioural ecology Flashcards
what are Niko Tinbergen’s four “why?”s questions?
- Causation - What are the Mechanisms causing the behaviour to happen - neurobiology, gene expression - the ST mechanisms that cause the bhv. 2. Development - Ontogeny (in invididual’s life) - is bhv learnt / instinctive? The degree to which the bhv is controlled by genes or environmental. 3. Evolutionary history or Phylogeny of the bhv - do we see similar bhv in close relatives? What point in evo time did this bhv first evolve?when was the transition + what was the selective force? 4. Function - Adaptive value - what use is it to the animal in its life? How does NS favour that bhv + how does NS act on it.
How is an animal’s behaviour adapted to its ecological circumstances?
o Behaviour o Ecology o Evolution Understanding the function of behaviour requires an understanding of the ecology of the animal in question. Only by understanding the role of the behaviour in the animal’s life can one understand why the behaviour evolved and why natural selection favours it today.
why is natural selection is an optimising agent?
works as if nature was optimising fitness: only the best survive + reproduce successfully. - The optimum behaviour will depend on the costs and benefits of alternative courses of action.
what are the two types of economic model used by behavioural ecologists?
Optimisation - heavy use of economic models to understand behaviour and generate hypotheses that can be tested.: simple optimisation models, which quantify the costs and benefits associated with a behaviour and calculate the optimum trade-off between these costs and benefits, Game Theory - game theory is essential when the best thing to do depends on what other individuals are doing; (aggressive interactions etc) game theory becomes useful when analysing social behaviour.
Why do black headed gulls remove the eggs of their newly hatched chicks some 15 to 20 minutes after the chicks are born? What is the adaptive value? how did Tinbergen solve this?
- There are many possible functional explanations. For example the chicks could injure themselves on the sharp shell, or bacteria could grow on the inside of the shell and be a source of infection Experiment: hen’s eggs in artificial nests: put painted hens eggs in artificial nests, as food for predators, and placed broken shell near these artificial nests or not. Result: enough, nests with white eggshell in them had a higher predation rate. Parents remove shells only after chick dried out and fluffy
Why do male dungflies copulate as long (or as short) as they do?
There is a trade-off between the benefits of extra time increasing his paternity with this female (eggs fertilised) and time being wasted that could be better spent looking for a new female. The currency, the long-term rate of fertilising eggs, = the percentage of females egg is fertilised divided by the total time taken. The time is not simply the time is spent with the female copulating, it should also include the time searching for females.
what are the three ingredients of the Marginal value theorem?
1) Choices a. possible copulation durations 2) Constraints a. gain curve (time)) b. search time 3) Currency a. long-term rate of fertilising eggs. - not just about success with this F, success over a long period of time (mating season of dungflie) a series of choices to pick between, a set of constraints within which the animal must operate, and a currency by which success is measured.
what is the trade-off Foraging in patches?
between the gain rate within a patch (energy gain from food) at a high rate early on but slowing down with time in the patch, and the cost of travelling between patches.
what did Alex Kacelnik (1984) do?
Trained wild starlings, feeding their young in nests, to come to feeder for mealworms, where they received mealworms at a controlled rate. o This ensured that all birds experienced a specific gain curve with diminishing returns o Varied distance between feeder and nest (greater distance, greater travel time) o experimental manipulation was to move the feeder different distances from the birds nests, and record how the time spent in the patch (and the number of mealworms) changed. This kept everything under tight environmental control.
how did Krebs study Prey choice in great tits - Great tit, Parus major
Krebs varied the encounter rate of the birds with large chunks of mealworm (good prey) interspersed with small chunks (poor prey). He found that the birds were specialists when encounter rates with good prey were high (short search time) but became generalists when encounter rates were low. His experiment gave qualitative support for the optimal prey choice model, but unlike the model, the birds showed partial preferences. The model predicts you should either be a complete specialist or a complete generalist either side of the critical search time, but the birds did not show an all-or-nothing switch.
Give a summary of Prey choice?
- If find type 1, always take it 2. If find type 2 take it if: energy content of poor prey / handing time for poor prey is > than good prey. 3. Otherwise reject it; specialise on type 1
Possible reasons for a model to fail?
o Choices could be mis-specified (or wrong model) –> Animal might not be capable of behavioural choices o Missed constraints o Wrong currency –> Predicting behaviour (energy intake that is not most critical to the animal)
What do we understand under The forager’s perspective?
Animal’s view of the world isn’t the same as ours e.g. we know the lab is safe, the animal doesn’t.
What is animal’s behaviour Animal’s behaviour influenced by? (models)
Animal’s behaviour influenced by: o learning o risk sensitivity o predation (different currency)
Steve Lima Woodpecker experiment: o Empty v 24 seeds (all holes in log filled/empty) o Empty v 12 seed o Empty v 6 seeds What did he find?
24 seeds: optimum number of holes checked –> 1 12 seeds –> 3 6 seeds –> 6 o Model assumes that woodpeckers can learn the number of seeds in non-empty logs o But once they find a seed, they tend to check every hole not predicted by model the birds have some sort of rule which gets them close to the optimal solution, but they are clearly not solving the problem the way Lima did with his model. It seems reasonable that animals use ‘rules of thumb’ which approximate good solutions to problems and don’t come equipped with specific probability distributions (or learn them).
Explain risk sensitivity and give 2 risk levels?
uncertainty (variance) in reward rather than risk of death o Risk-averse: prefer less variability/uncertainty o Risk-prone: prefer more variability/uncertainty
Risk sensitivity in small bird in winter, what was found?
During the day, as it feeds and accumulates fat, if it’s doing well (in the yellow zone) it should be RISK-AVERSE: there is no point gambling because you are on-track for the right reserves by dusk and so you should play safe. However, if you’re not on track and look like having a shortfall by dusk (in the red zone), you should be RISK-PRONE. There’s no point playing safe because a steady supply of food won’t get you above the threshold by dusk - you need to gamble.
Caraco and colleagues (1990) on Yellow-eyed junco birds, Junco phaeonotus, what was found at different temperatures (low vs high) considering risk sensitivity?
Given two feeding options differing in variance, at low temperatures when the birds’ energy balance was negative, they were risk prone. When in a positive energy balance at higher temperatures, they were risk averse. Just as predicted. Switch according to their energy budget and fat reserves.
Decisions on where to feed/when to feed influenced by what?
o Value of food o Reduces risk of dying from starvation and reserves for mate attracting and territory defense o Value of life o Effected by the value of predation o Probability of predation
What if: can only get high rate of energetic gain by accepting high level of predation? What are the 2 contexts?
Trade-off: o energy vs. predation 2 contexts: o Vigilance o Habitat choice
Metcalfe & Furness (1984) - Turnstone (small wading bird), Arenaria interpres?
o Adults but not juveniles migrate o vigilance ▼ with larger flock size o individual risk is lower and more eyes looking out for danger o adult vigilance ▼ before migration o with migration, lots of fat reserves needed (50% bodyweight gained) at the expense of higher predation risk o juvenile vigilance does not change.
How does habitat choice influence the feeding behaviour in Bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus researched by Earl Werner and colleagues (1983)?
o Added predator (bass) to one half of pond o Compared feeding behaviour of small and large fish Size o Predation risk goes down as fish gets bigger o The behaviour of the sunfish depended on their body size because predation risk goes down as they get larger. With predator o Small fish feed in vegetation around edge o One third less food, 27% less growth o Predator imposes cost even if it doesn’t kill The smaller fish accept a lower feeding rate in order to lower their predation risk. Note that this is a ‘hidden cost’ of predation risk - not death, but a lower growth rate.
Experimental evidence (Locusts) by Raubenheimer & Simpson on trade-ff between nutrients
fed locusts on combinations of 5 different protein & 5 different carbohydrate levels o Locusts on low protein diet ate more to meet protein target… but got fat (because too many carbohydrates)
What are the two types of competition face by species?
- Exploitation - resource used up by others: (eating / using them: not physical interaction but an affect on success) 2. Interference - interactions with others reduce intake rate (interfer another’s ability to forage successfully) o ‘getting in the way’ o resource defence o prey disturbed
