Behavioural ecology Flashcards
Personality
Individual consistency in behavioural tendencies across time and contexts
Common persoanlity traits
aggression, boldness, activity levels
Behavioural syndromes
- Consistent differences in a suite of correlated behaviours that are carried across contexts
- Consistency in 2 or more traits (as opposed to personality which is consistency in one trait)
Limitations to adaptive plasticity in behaviroual syndromes
More aggressive females (funnel web spiders) tend to attack prey more quickly, attack conspecific territorial intruders and engage in higher, sometimes maladaptive sexual cannibalism (females eat males before they have a chance to mate)
Life histories
Personality traits (e.g. boldness, activity, aggressiveness) often positively associated with food intake rates/productivity/ growth/time to reproduction/etc.
Example of behaviroul syndrome
- great tits
- Fast explorers tend to be more aggressive and less neophobic (‘bolder’)
- Proactive-reactive scale
-Aggressive-boldness syndrome
What is the trade-off for funnel web spiders behaviroual syndrome?
Trade-off between stopping conspecific intruders (coming into your web eating your food), however, will not be able to reproduce if you kill males spiders before copulating
Evolutionary implications for funnel web spiders trade off?
- If only less aggressive females mate (don’t eat males) this behavioural syndrome will be favoured in selection – reducing genetic variation
- Implications for growth
maladaptive behaviour of funnel web spiders
The female funnel web spiders are too aggressive, and so they attack potential mates and reduce their reproductive outcomes
when traits are correlated, they should be studied together, as a package, rather than an isolated unit
- You miss important behaviours if you only focus on one and ignore behaviours that are correlated with it
- For example, if you only consider mating behaviour in female spiders, and not aggression, you may misinterpret why females attack/kill their mate before copulating
genetic basis of inheritance of behaviours
Natural selection can only work on genetic differences and so for behavior to evolve there must be behavior alternatives in the population and these differences must be heritable
genetic variation in quantitative traits
Degree by which individual phenotypes are determined by their genotype – the degree of determination or heritability
controlling for the environment to test if differences are genetic
- cross-fostering experiment
- common garden
- population crosses - hybrids should be intermediate
heritability
extent to which phenotypes are determined by the genes transmitted from the parents
three key predictions of the sexy sons model of mate choice
- Genetic basis– offspring will have increased fitness due to being more attractive
- All females will tend to express the same preference (agree on the most attractive male)
- Over time selection will occur for males enabling these preferred traits even when they do not increase fitness in other ways
What is the main difference between the good genes model and the sexy sons model?
- The same as the sexy son’s model
- However, it adds one more component – a general viability benefit (increases survival)
How do models of genetic compatibility differ from the sexy son and good genes model of mate choice?
- Females find different males attractive
- Try to avoid inbreeding
- No matter how attractive a peahen may find a male, or no matter if his tail is the longest, she will not mate with her brother
What would constitute good evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis?
Look at interaction between males and females (do females prefer one male or several)
sensory exploitation
Tuning into pre-existing biases (e.g. look like a food choice so females are attracted to you)
sensory trap
Males are able to use sensory exploitation to trap females and mate with them (e.g. sound like a bat, which causes females to freeze, and then males can mate with the female)
phenotypic plasticity
The property of a given genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to distinct environmental conditions
reaction norm
describes the relationship between phenotype and the environment
genetic basis of phenotypic plasticity
Different genotypes respond differently and selection acts on this interaction called the ‘genotype by environmental interaction’
example of phenotypic plasticity - discontinuous
- alternative male reproductive phenotypes (length of forceps) in European earwig
- There comes a point when the environment favors a shift to the alternative phenotype
- Minor males (short forceps) have a higher fitness than major males (with long forceps) at a smaller body size – where the functions intercept is where the individuals should switch its morph
what can phenotypic plasticity do
- Increase niche breadth
- Fuel sexual selection
- Provide a refuge from predators
- Maximize the fitness of sexes
- Divide labor within social groups
- Shape social environments
issues in conservation that can be addressed with behavioural studies
- reproductive barrier
- recognition and responses to introduced predators
- effect of population density
- predicting consequence of environmental change
- siblicide (offspring fight and die) in population growth
example of how individuals can be more important than others
elephant matriarch
How can behavioral ecology inform us about conservation issues?
Understanding what critical tolerance limits are, how long these limits can be tolerated for, and how this affects reproduction and the amount of suitable habitat available is crucial
pied babbler and climate change effects
- Due to an increase in heat dissipation and a decline in foraging efficiency, individuals steadily lose body mass at high temperatures
- If the duration and intensity of heatwaves increase, individuals may not be able to maintain sufficient body condition to enable reproduction
- Potential for large population decline due to lack of recruitment during very hot breeding season
marginal value theorem
The organism exploits a resource or something about gaining a resource
diminishing returns
- The benefit of the resource is affected by the activity of the organism exploiting it – yielding ‘diminishing returns’
- Puffin and sand eels – easy to catch the first sand eel, but hard to catch the 8th sand eel when there are already 7 in your mouth
optimal foraging in honeybees
- When they go to a flower, they fill up their crop with nectar which is taken back to the hive
- As the bee gets heavier, the cost of flying increases
- The more flowers they visit, the more their flight uses up the nectar/energy of the last flower
prey switching is determined by
- Handling time
- Energy value
- Searching time
prey switching predictions
- Predator should always eat the profitable prey when they are available
- When profitable prey are abundant predators should suddenly switch to specialize on this alone
- The abundance of less profitable prey should have no effect on the decision to specialize – should ignore non-profitable prey (no matter how abundant they are, so long as profitable prey is available)
sexual dimorphism
Distinct differences in size or appearance between the sexes in addition to the sexual organs themselves
mechanisms of sexual selection
- intrasexual (within a given sex)
- intersexual (between sexes)
intrasexual selection examples
- pre-mating: male mating competition
- post-mating: sperm competition
intersexual selection examples
- pre-mating: female mate choice
- post-mating: cryptic female choice
anisogamy
difference in gamete size - female gametes larger than male gametes
Can variation in the degree of anisogamy influence the strength of selection?
Sexual selection should be much stronger in species where one sex has a much higher capacity to mate – strong potential for competitive exclusion
parental investment
investment in present offspring that increases survival at the cost of investment in future offspring
operational sex ratio
Ratio of fertilizable females to sexually active males at any given time
sex role reversal in insects
- Males produce food gifts in the ejaculate
- Food abundant: sexual selection acts more strongly on males (females chose males with largest gift)
- Food scarce: females compete for males and their food gifts
- Males are less available to mate, there is not enough food for them to get, they can now afford to be picky
intrasexual selection
Competition among members of the same sex for access to mates
intersexual selection
Members of one sex choose mating partners among individuals of the other sex
direct benefits of evolution of sexually selected traits
Individuals (usually females) benefit by preferentially choosing mates that provide resources that improve the choosing individuals reproductive success
Sexy sons model
Females benefit by preferentially mating with attractive males that bestow their (male) offspring with genes that improve attractiveness
Good genes model
Differs from sexy son model in that choosy females obtain intrinsically good genes that improve offspring viability