Behavioural ecology Flashcards
Personality
Individual consistency in behavioural tendencies across time and contexts
Common persoanlity traits
aggression, boldness, activity levels
Behavioural syndromes
- Consistent differences in a suite of correlated behaviours that are carried across contexts
- Consistency in 2 or more traits (as opposed to personality which is consistency in one trait)
Limitations to adaptive plasticity in behaviroual syndromes
More aggressive females (funnel web spiders) tend to attack prey more quickly, attack conspecific territorial intruders and engage in higher, sometimes maladaptive sexual cannibalism (females eat males before they have a chance to mate)
Life histories
Personality traits (e.g. boldness, activity, aggressiveness) often positively associated with food intake rates/productivity/ growth/time to reproduction/etc.
Example of behaviroul syndrome
- great tits
- Fast explorers tend to be more aggressive and less neophobic (‘bolder’)
- Proactive-reactive scale
-Aggressive-boldness syndrome
What is the trade-off for funnel web spiders behaviroual syndrome?
Trade-off between stopping conspecific intruders (coming into your web eating your food), however, will not be able to reproduce if you kill males spiders before copulating
Evolutionary implications for funnel web spiders trade off?
- If only less aggressive females mate (don’t eat males) this behavioural syndrome will be favoured in selection – reducing genetic variation
- Implications for growth
maladaptive behaviour of funnel web spiders
The female funnel web spiders are too aggressive, and so they attack potential mates and reduce their reproductive outcomes
when traits are correlated, they should be studied together, as a package, rather than an isolated unit
- You miss important behaviours if you only focus on one and ignore behaviours that are correlated with it
- For example, if you only consider mating behaviour in female spiders, and not aggression, you may misinterpret why females attack/kill their mate before copulating
genetic basis of inheritance of behaviours
Natural selection can only work on genetic differences and so for behavior to evolve there must be behavior alternatives in the population and these differences must be heritable
genetic variation in quantitative traits
Degree by which individual phenotypes are determined by their genotype – the degree of determination or heritability
controlling for the environment to test if differences are genetic
- cross-fostering experiment
- common garden
- population crosses - hybrids should be intermediate
heritability
extent to which phenotypes are determined by the genes transmitted from the parents
three key predictions of the sexy sons model of mate choice
- Genetic basis– offspring will have increased fitness due to being more attractive
- All females will tend to express the same preference (agree on the most attractive male)
- Over time selection will occur for males enabling these preferred traits even when they do not increase fitness in other ways
What is the main difference between the good genes model and the sexy sons model?
- The same as the sexy son’s model
- However, it adds one more component – a general viability benefit (increases survival)
How do models of genetic compatibility differ from the sexy son and good genes model of mate choice?
- Females find different males attractive
- Try to avoid inbreeding
- No matter how attractive a peahen may find a male, or no matter if his tail is the longest, she will not mate with her brother
What would constitute good evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis?
Look at interaction between males and females (do females prefer one male or several)
sensory exploitation
Tuning into pre-existing biases (e.g. look like a food choice so females are attracted to you)
sensory trap
Males are able to use sensory exploitation to trap females and mate with them (e.g. sound like a bat, which causes females to freeze, and then males can mate with the female)
phenotypic plasticity
The property of a given genotype to produce different phenotypes in response to distinct environmental conditions
reaction norm
describes the relationship between phenotype and the environment
genetic basis of phenotypic plasticity
Different genotypes respond differently and selection acts on this interaction called the ‘genotype by environmental interaction’
example of phenotypic plasticity - discontinuous
- alternative male reproductive phenotypes (length of forceps) in European earwig
- There comes a point when the environment favors a shift to the alternative phenotype
- Minor males (short forceps) have a higher fitness than major males (with long forceps) at a smaller body size – where the functions intercept is where the individuals should switch its morph