behavioural approach to explaining phobias Flashcards
what does the behavioural approach emphasise?
- the role of learning in the acquisition of behaviour
- focuses on behaviour; what we can see
> panic, avoidance and endurance - not cognitive and emotional aspects
who proposed to the two-process model and what is it?
- orval hobart mowrer (1960)
- based on the behavioural approach to phobias
- states that phobias are acquired (learned in the first place) by classical conditional and then continue because of operant conditioning
how are phobias acquired by classical conditioning?
- an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and a neutral stimulus (NS) are repeated paired together
- the NS eventually produces the same response that was first produced by the UCS alone
what occurred in the ‘little albert’ study?
- john watson and rosalie rayner (1920) created a phobia in a 9-month-old baby called ‘little albert’, who showed no unusual anxiety at the start of the study
- when a white rat was presented to him, the researchers made a loud, frightening noise by banging an iron bar close to albert’s ear (noise = UCS, creating an UCR of fear)
- when a rat (NS) and UCS are encountered close together, NS becomes associated with UCS and both produce fear response
- rat becomes CS that produces a CR
how was little albert’s conditioning generalised to similar objects?
- they tested albert by showing him other furry objects such as a non-white rabbit, a fur coat and watson wearing a santa claus beard made out of cotton balls
- he displayed distress at the sight of all of these
how is a phobia maintained by operant conditioning?
- behaviour is reinforced or punished
- both negative and positive reinforcement increases the frequency of a behaviour
- in the case of negative reinforcement, an individual avoids a situation that is unpleasant
- such a behaviour results in a desirable consequence, which means the behaviour will be repeated
what did mowrer suggest about the avoidance of a phobia in relation to operant conditioning?
- whenever we avoid a phobic stimulus we successfully escape the fear and anxiety that we would have experienced if we had remained there
- this reduction in fear reinforces the avoidance behaviour so the phobia is maintained
evaluation: real-world application in exposure therapies (eg. systematic desensitisation)
- distinctive element of the two-process model is the idea that phobias are maintained by avoidance of the phobic stimulus
- this is important in explaining why people with phobias benefit from being exposed to the phobic stimulus
- once the avoidance behaviour is prevented it ceases to be reinforced by the experience of anxiety reduction and avoidance therefore declines
- in behavioural terms, the phobia is the avoidance behaviour so when this avoidance is prevented the phobia is cured
- this shows the value of the two-process approach as it identifies a means of treating phobias
evaluation: does not account for cognitive aspects of phobias
- behavioural explanation is only geared towards explaining behaviour eg. avoidance of phobic stimulus
- however, we know that phobias are not simply avoidance responses and also have significant cognitive component eg. people hold irrational beliefs about the phobic stimulus
- two-process model does not offer an adequate explanation for phobic cognitions does not completely explain the symptoms of phobias
evaluation: evidence for a link between bad experiences and phobias
- little albert study shows how a frightening experience involving a stimulus can lead to a phobia of that stimulus
- ad de jongh et al. (2006) found that 73% of people with a fear of dental treatment had experienced a traumatic experience, mostly involving dentistry, but also being the victim of a violent crime
- this can be compared to a control group of people with low dental anxiety where only 21% had experienced a traumatic event
- this confirms that the association between stimulus (dentistry) and an UCR (pain) does lead to the development of the phobia
evaluation: not all phobias appear following a bad experience
- common phobias such as snake phobias occur in populations where very few people have any experience of snakes let alone traumatic experiences
- also not all frightening experiences lead to phobias
- this means that the association between phobias and frightening experiences is not as strong as we would expect if behavioural theories provided a complete explanation
evaluation: learning and evolution
- more general aspects of phobias may be better explained by evolutionary theory
- eg. we tend to acquire phobias of things that have presented a danger in our evolutionary past (eg. snakes or the dark)
- this is called preparedness (seligman 1971)