BEhavioral nero: memory Flashcards
Henry Molaison (patient HM)
- HM is the most studied patient in history of neuroscience (see Corkin, 2002)
- 1926 – 2008 (aged 82)
- Severe temporal lobe epilepsy. Likely as a result of a bicycle accident as a child
- Surgery to reduce the seizures. Did reduce seizures, BUT Profound and selective impact on HM’s memory function
- catastrophic outcome ensured that the surgery was not repeated
- HM is unique
- And research on HM had a profound impact on models of memory function
Theories of memory prior to HM
- In the mid 20th century, memory function was believed to be distributed throughout the cortex
- memory thought to be well integrated with perceptual and intellectual functions
- no region of the brain was believed to be disproportionately dedicated to memory
- C.f. the known localization (at the time) of motor function and language (Broca’s area)
Models of memory after HM
- studies of HM heralded the modern era of memory research. early descriptions of HM set the direction of subsequent work on memory
- Basic findings
- profound forgetfulness
- absence of any general intellectual or perceptual deficit
- impairment extended to both verbal and non-verbal material
- affected information acquired through all sensory modalities
- established the principle that memory is a distinct cerebral function
- separable from perceptual and cognitive abilities
- identified the medial aspect of the temporal lobe as important for memory
HM’s temporal lobe surgery
• Bilateral resection of extensive mesial temporal tissue • William Scoville • 1953 at age 27 Structures removed • amygdala • most of hippocampi • part of parahippocampal gyrus • Connections severed with the frontal cortex • With unknown consequences
Anatomical views of HM’s brain
MRI BY Corkin et al. (1997)
• Scan made in 1998
• relatively low resolution (1mm)
• Post-mortem autopsy by Annese et al. (2014)
• orbitofrontal lesions likely during the surgery
• affecting working memory?
• cerebellar atrophy due to long term use of phenytoin
Medial Temporal Lobe and Hippocampal formation
Medial Temporal Lobe • Sagittal section • Medial surface of right hemisphere • Hippocampal formation • Bilateral view • anterior(ish)
Impact of temporal lobe surgery on other fuction of HM
- Tested in 1955, age 29 Scoville & Milner (1957)
- Shown to have normal attention span, preserved intelligence
- Retrograde memory recovered over time
- Reported date as March 1953 (6 months before operation)
- Believed he was 27 years old
Memory systems:
Retrograde vs. Anterograde amnesia
- Retrograde amnesia
- impairment for memories created prior to injury
- Anterograde amnesia
- impairment for memories created after injury
- impairment in learning novel (new) information
- HM had a severe anterograde amnesia
- declarative vs. procedural
Memory systems:
Declarative vs. Procedural memory
- Declarative memory
- conscious access to information learned previously (fact and event)
- Procedural memory
- (nondeclarative) remembering ‘how to’
- (e.g. playing piano)
HM’s Declarative memory
post-op
- Declarative memory function severely impaired
- Couldn’t navigate to find his new family home even after 10 months
- Unable to recall names or faces of new people Despite frequent visits over the years
- Remembered that his mother died But not that his uncle had, leading to perpetual grief everytime
- Language largely frozen in 1950’s
- Some exceptions (Ayatollah, Rock n Roll)
- Could retain verbal information if rehearsed
- Once distracted all information lost
HM’s Procedural memory(post-op)
- Procedural memory function continued intact after surgery
- Still able to learn new skills but has no recall of learning them (because of a declarative impairment)
- Normal performance on procedural memory tasks
- Spared ability to learn new perceptual-motor skills
- mirror drawing
- Corkin (2002)
What does HM tell us about function of mesial temporal lobe on memory?
- Mesial temporal lobe structures essential for memory function
- Mesial temporal lobe structures more essential for anterograde than retrograde memory
- Distinction between Declarative and Procedural memory
The long term contribution of studies of HM (why is it important)
- Non-human primate research in the 1980’s clarified which parts of HM’s lesion are important for memory Mishkin (1978)
- The extent of HM’s surgery only fully understood post-mortem
- Scoville failed to remove the caudal 2cm of HM’s hippocampus
- The surgery likely damaged fibres linking the temporal pole with the frontal lobe
- There was evidence of a lesion in the frontal lobe (from surgery)
- Other patients with similar surgery were not systematically studied as neurological/psychiatric symptoms made them less desirable as a “pure” amnesic
- Henry Molaison remains unique
What have we learned since HM?
- Intact memory function relies on a neuroanatomical network, which involves many brain regions.
- The Temporal Lobes (TL) are the ‘engine’ of memory.
- Functional asymmetry of the brain
Schematic representation of Medial Temporal Lobe
- Sensory information sent to hippocampal formation via association for long-term storage
- Memories involve reciprocal connections between hippocampal formation and temporal neocortex