Behavioral Competencies - Interpersonal Flashcards
What are the sub-competencies of “Relationship Management”?
- Networking
- Relationship building
- Teamwork
- Negotiation
- Conflict Management
relationship conflict
Relationship-related intergroup conflicts are emotional in nature and based on discord within interpersonal relationships stemming from differences in personal values or style. These conflicts carry a perception of interpersonal incompatibility and often involve tension, animosity, and aggravation among team members.
task conflict
Task related intergroup conflicts are cognitive in nature and typically over goal definition or how work should be performed.
Is task conflict always a bad thing?
No. Low to moderate levels of task conflict with sufficient levels of trust and safety are functional and may stimulate healthy competition or creative ideas.
However, high levels of task conflict can be harmful to productive work processes and diminish team cohesiveness
Inter-organizational conflict
Conflict between organizations, may result from competition or takeover attempts. This type of conflict can lead to decreased organizational loyalty and cohesiveness among employees.
Intraorganizational conflict
Intraorganizational conflict occurs when there is disagreement in an organization, either within or between levels. Three levels of intraorganizational conflict are vertical, which occurs among different hierarchical levels; horizontal, which occurs between departments on the same level (e.g., sales department versus manufacturing department); and line–staff, which occurs between line managers and staff managers.
What are strategies for intergroup intervention?
- Finding a common enemy - Groups must coordinate efforts to fight the outsider and achieve success
- Join activities - increased activities foster more positive attitudes and sentiments, ill feelings toward one another should dissipate
- Rotating membership - group attitudes are strongly influenced by its members, and transferring people between groups may build awareness and perspective.
- Conflict resolution meetings
Accommodation
(Conflict resolution technique) One party decides to give in to the other. Once the other party has what it wants, the conflict should be over.
This technique can be useful when the accommodating party wants to preserve the relationship, end the conflict, or isn’t that personally invested in the outcome of the situation
Collaboration
(Conflict resolution technique) Both parties need to determine an outcome that is favorable (or at least palatable) for everyone involved. Collaboration is an effective technique when there is adequate time available to come to an agreement. It is ineffective when conflict needs to be resolved on the spot.
Ideally, this technique strengthens the relationships within the parties and results in an amicably resolved conflict.
Compromise
Both sides make concessions, so each party is somewhat satisfied but not entirely satisfied with the outcome. In a compromise, each party gives up some of what they want in order to move forward.
Competition
(Conflict resolution style) Whoever has the most clout determines how the conflict is resolved. This type of resolution can also occur when one voice within the conflict becomes more dominant than the other(s) even if he/she doesn’t have a formal position of power.
Can be effective when decisions need to be made fast. Drawback is that it can make people feel trampled on, negatively affecting morale.
Avoidance
With this conflict resolution style, conflict goes ignored because generally they dislike confrontation.
Cooperation
With this conflict management style, preserving relationships is viewed as more important than being right. The conflict is resolved via accommodation or collaboration.
This style can be effective when there is enough time to come to a consensus or when maintaining harmony is critical to organizational success.
Conciliation
This conflict resolution style is when one party attempts to gain favor with the other party. They may try to overcome differences of opinion and reestablish trust to persuade a person to adopt their view.
Those who resolve conflict with this style seek to get their way. However, they are less aggressive than those who favor the competition style.
perspective taking
Perspective taking involves deeply understanding the position of the other party. If the negotiator understands where the other party is coming from, he/she will be better able to offer a deal that works well for both parties.
Principled bargaining
The principled bargainer views negotiations as fluid, exploratory conversations, guided by principles, to ultimately achieve mutually beneficial solutions. Rather than viewing the other party as an adversary or negotiation is something to be won, a principled bargainer sees all parties involved as problem-solvers looking for the most efficient outcome for everyone. This is commonly known as a win-win form of negotiation.
Auction
An auction can be a great bargaining strategy when a decision needs to be made quickly and will solely be based on price. However, if service and value are important to the parties involved, and time permits, entering into a negotiation process may be a better solution. Negotiations can accommodate for more nuances and can be handled discreetly.
Interest-based bargaining
The parties begin the negotiation by plainly stating their main interests. The process involves coming to an agreement that satisfies those interests while minimizing the pain of concessions that need to be made.
A principled bargainer will utilize interest based bargaining to establish a win-win deal for all parties involved.
Position-based bargaining
Positional bargaining is an approach that frames negotiation as an adversarial, zero-sum exercise focused on claiming rather than creating value.
Typically one party will stake out a high (or low) opening position (demand or offer) and the other a correspondingly low (or high) one.
What are the downsides of positional bargaining?
- Negotiators are typically reluctant to back down
- Negotiators often try to best their counterpart by opening with an extreme position and then focus only on how to counteroffer without budging
- Positional bargaining often becomes a contest of wills, resulting in anger and resentment
- Parties tend to perceive concessions and compromise as signs of weakness and vulnerability rather than as potential value-creating move
What are strategies to building trust?
- Exhibit emotional intelligence
- Relatability
- Vulernability
- Transparency
- Recognizing individual strengths