Before Midterm Flashcards
1
Q
Moral Judgments
A
- have to be able to justify them, which requires consistency
- unlike a dislike or like which does not need justification
- has to apply in many similar instances
2
Q
Utilitarian View
A
- concerned with maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain
- benefits and suffering have to be weighed against each other - i. e. the consequences need to be assessed
- aim to produce best outcome for largest number of sentient beings
3
Q
Contractarian View
A
- only considers human interests: only humans can enter into contract and punish someone who breaks it
- mutual cooperation: treating others well means you will be treated well
4
Q
Animal Rights View
A
- instrumentalizing animals is wrong
- they are sentient and have high-level cognitive abilities
- the right to life, liberty, and respect cannot be overridden by other benefits to humans
5
Q
Contextual (Relational) Views
A
- the vulnerability and dependence of animals on us give us a responsibility towards them
- emotional bonds between humans and animals mean special commitments are made and give rise to obligations
- especially towards particular individual animals
- ethics of care: causing suffering is wrong because it demonstrates a lack of care
6
Q
Respect for Nature View
A
- the natural form of animals is why they have rights
- protection of natural SPECIES, their genetic integrity and some natural processes are of moral significance
- animals are valued as tokens of their species
7
Q
Science and Ethics in Animal Welfare
A
- SCIENCE cannot tell us what to do about animal welfare, it can however confirm if something is painful or not
- ETHICS deals with what is good and bad and what moral duties and obligations we may have - it dictates how we ought to behave
8
Q
Underlying Reason for Studying Animal Welfare
A
- the assumption that animals have moral standing and that we have ethical duties towards them
9
Q
Direct vs Indirect Duties
A
- DIRECT duties towards animals mean that animals have moral standing in their own right and are members of our moral community
- INDIRECT duties mean that animals do not have moral standing and are not members of our moral community
10
Q
Pythagoras
A
- 5 BC
- believed in kinship between animals and humans
- opposed to killing and consumption of animals because he believed in reincarnation
- we have direct duties towards animals, animals are part of our moral community
11
Q
Aristotle
A
- 300 BC
- wrote “History of the Animals” made a lot of accurate observations
- believed animals and humans share perception & emotion but only humans can speak and reason (logos), therefore animals must have been created for man
- we do NOT have duties towards animals, they exist for us to fulfill our needs
12
Q
St. Thomas Aquinas
A
- 13th century
- God gave humans animals to use
- animals do not have immortal souls
- but if people become cruel towards animals, they may also mistreat humans
- we have INDIRECT moral duties towards animals to protect the human soul from cruelty
13
Q
Rene Descartes
A
- 16th century
- introduced concept of animals as “automata” (machines) - they do not possess consciousness
- they can feel pain but not conscious of it (capable of emotion but not of thought or rationality
- humans have NO obligations towards animals, morally inoffensive to be cruel
14
Q
Thomas Hobbes
A
- 16th century
- social contract theory = cooperation based on social contracts
- humans act out of self-interest, but animals have no language so they can’t cooperate or enter into contracts, therefore they have no inherent moral standing
- if an animal matters to a person, no one else may be cruel to it
- we have INDIRECT moral obligations if an animal belongs to/ matters to a human
15
Q
John Locke
A
- 17th century
- developed Hobbes’ idea of social contracts
- animals have simple mental capacities but cannot form abstractions and therefore can’t understand contracts
- animals can suffer & it is wrong to harm them because it may harden the human soul towards other humans
- we have INDIRECT moral obligations because of the way cruelty can affect humans
16
Q
Immanuel Kant
A
- 18th century
- morality is about following absolute rules (categorical imperatives)
- humans have intrinsic value but animals can be treated as a means to an end, they only have instrumental value
- if animals show human attributes then by not being cruel we show respect for human attributes
- we have INDIRECT moral duties towards animals - only when they act like humans (loyalty, friendship)
17
Q
Summary of Philosophers until Kant
A
- humans have special attributes that make us distinct from animals (factual claim)
- and because of these attributes, we are of moral concern (moral claim)
18
Q
Jeremy Bentham
A
- 18th century
- not the action matters, its consequences do
- good = happiness, evil = suffering
- if we should not discriminate against different humans then we should not discriminate against animals either
- for him main question: can animals suffer - no other abilities matter for moral consideration
- we have DIRECT moral duties towards animals since they can suffer
19
Q
John Stuart Mill
A
- 19th century
- developed Utilitarianism from Bentham’s principles
- a good action causes greatest amount of happiness (greatest happiness principle)
- Yes, we have DIRECT moral duties towards animals because they can suffer
20
Q
Peter Singer
A
- 20th century
- wrote “Animal Liberation”: promotes Utilitarian approach but opposes most animal use
- not opposed to killing but has to be after a good life and has to be painless
- Yes, we have DIRECT moral obligations towards animals
21
Q
Tom Reagan
A
- 20th century
- wrote “The Case for Animal Rights” in opposition to Singer’s book
- argued animals are subjects of a life and therefore have inherent value and therefore have right to be respected and not harmed
- killing is harm by deprivation (of life)
- opposed to having pets and euthanasia
- Yes, we have DIRECT moral obligations towards animals
22
Q
Teleological Theories
A
- based on goodness and badness - that is the results of actions (telos = result)
- ex. Utilitarianism
23
Q
Deontological Theories
A
- based on rightness and wrongness, that is intrinsic properties of actions (deontos = obligation)
- ex. Animal Rights View
24
Q
Who developed distinction between teleological and deontological theories?
A
- Bernard Rollin (teaches veterinary ethics)
25
Q
Weakness of Utilitarianism
A
- justice may not be done, some harms are just unacceptable to most regardless of the benefits
26
Q
Weakness of Animal Rights View
A
- the term harm is difficult to define
- concept of inherent value is also unclear
- unclear how to handle rights conflicts
- not clear what are obligations to wild animals are
27
Q
Singer and Regan on Farm Animals
A
- they make different ethical claims but in the end they make very similar factual claims: farm animals suffer and therefore we should not use them
28
Q
What are Welfarists?
A
- people who believe in limited rights for animals (unlike Regan who believed in full rights)
- they usually make the same ethical decisions as utilitarians