BB The inter-war years: 1918–1939 Flashcards
aims of Wilson
wanted 14 points to ensure world peace including the creation of the league of nations and including Germany
Terms:
The creation of independent states like Poland that had access to the sea
The return of Alsace-Lorraine to France
The end of Germany’s empire and the weakening of all empires
Avoiding blaming Germany for the start of the First World War. This included not making Germany pay high reparations
The inclusion of all nations, including Germany, in the League of Nations
Freedom of the seas. Wilson believed that trading ships should have access to any waters without fear of attack
aims of Llyod George
middle ground between Clemenceau and Wilson
wanted revenge but also wanted to trade with Germany to prevent another war
Terms:
Retaining a strong trading relationship with Germany
Taking Germany’s overseas colonies
Harsh enough terms to satisfy the British desire for revenge. Lloyd George had just won an election on the promise that he would ‘make Germany pay’
Germany keeping its military strength to prevent communism from Russia spreading into Europe
A reduction in Germany’s navy to reinforce Britain’s naval supremacy
aims of Clemenceau
wanted to punish Germany severely, as France had been devastated from WW1, by loosing land and money
Terms:
High reparations
The protection of France’s borders
The splitting of Germany into states
Germany disbanding its armed forces to prevent another invasion
The return of Alsace-Lorraine to France
Giving France the rich industrial area in Germany known as the Saar Basin to rebuild its economy
Germany giving its overseas colonies to France
how much did Lloyd George achieve his aims in the ToV
did get Germany to destroy the majority of their Navy so did get Naval supremacy
did not get any of Germanies land or colonies to expand Britain’s empire
did not get lower reparations or keeping Germany as a trade partner
how much did Wilson achieve his aims in the ToV
did not get free navigation of the seas due to Britain’s navel supremacy
did not get the ending of all empires as France and Britain both expanded theirs
Germany were not allowed to join the League of nations
only thing he got was the creation of the League of nations
how much did Clemeceau achieve his aims in the ToV
he had more say than the others as the terms were harsh however he wanted them to be even harsher as he still wanted Germany to have a smaller army, pay higher reparations and for the rhineland to be given to France instead of just demilitarised
TOV terms - Diktat
German representatives were not allowed to attend the peace talks
Germany had to accept the terms of peace otherwise the Allies would take control of the country
TOV terms - territorial changes
Anschluss between Germany and Austria was forbidden
Germany was forbidden from joining the League of Nations
Germany was split in two by the polish corridor
Danzig was taken from Germany and made a free city under the league of nations control
The Saar (industrial area) was taken from Germany and given to the League of nations for 15 years
Rhineland (area between germany + france) was demilitarised
all of Germanies over seas colonies were given to the league of nations
TOV terms - military restrictions
only 6 battleships in the navy
army was limited to 100,000 men and no conscription
no tanks, submarines or air force
TOV terms - war guilt
Germany and their allies had to take full responsibility for starting the war
TOV terms - reparations
had to pay 6.6 billion to the winners which was estimated to take until 1988 to pay
reactions of the allies to the TOV - France
none of the allies were happy with the treaty as no leader achieved all their aims and all of them had to make significant compromises
Clemenceau - felt that reparations were not high enough. Didn’t like how Germany still had an army. Was satisfied that the Rhineland was demilitarised and that France could gain control of the Saar as they could gain money however wanted the Saar permanently.
Overall French people thought that the treaty was not harsh enough and Germany needed to be totally crippled.
reactions of the allies to the TOV - England
Was happy that Britain gained Naval supremacy over Germany. Also happy that Britain could expand its empire due to gaining some of Germanies colonies.
Overall the British public thought the treaty was fair as they were still very affected by the war however also thought it could have been harsher.
Lloyd Georges thought the reparations were too high and also knew that Germany would seek revenge so was concerned
reactions of the allies to the TOV - USA
Wilson - was happy the League of Nations had been created and that some countries had achieved self determination
Public - felt treaty was unfair on Germany as US only joined late and weren’t too effected. Public wanted US to stay out Europe’s business. Wanted peace and thought the treaty was getting the opposite
Politics - senate refused to ratify treaty as it was not based on 14 points so the US was unable to join the league which devasted Wilson
reactions of the allies to the TOV - Germany
German people called it Diktat as they had no choice and couldn’t negotiate
Germans called the German politicians who signed it November Criminals as they thought the treaty was dolchstoss (stab in the back). Didn’t like the treaty as they thought it was too harsh and they felt humiliated.
They also hated how they had to accept war guilt
there were lots of uprisings (kapp putsch + Hitler) and revolts in the first 5 years after the signing as so many people were unhappy
weaknesses of the treaty
6 million Germans ended up living outside of Germany and feared prosecution due to the hostility towards Germany
Germany lost 13% of land so many German families were forced off of their land
Many people thought the treaty was too harsh and would start another war
Germans felt too vulnerable due to reduced army
Germany had to accept war guilt even though many countries were involved in the start of the war.
The treaty was a diktat so Germany could not negotiate
Germans thought the treaty would have been based on Wilsons 14 peace points so may not have signed the armistice signed if they knew the actual treaty
Reparations crippled Germany and caused many economic problems
USA was not a member of the League which significantly weakened it
Strengths of the treaty
was signed at the end of the most devastating war in history so it was only fair for the treaty to be harsh
People thought that if Germany had won then the allies would have been made to sign an even harsher one
the peacemakers didn’t have very much time to create the treaty so did the best job they could
Brought temporary peace
created the League of Nations
problems faced by new states formed from the treaty
poland had no natural borders such as a river so its newly established borders were hard to defend
Poland was surrounded by enemy countries
The polish corridor also meant that lots of Germans were living in Poland
formation of the league of nations
in the TOV there were basic rules about how the treaty was going to be set up to be a way to bring about world peace. It was meant to be a group of countries the would work together and solve problems.
Its objectives were:
to stop war from breaking out again
to encourage disarmament
to improve working conditions
to tackle deadly diseases
based in Geneva, Switzerland as Switzerland had not been involved in war so it was a peaceful country
which countries were in the league
USA were unable to join as the senate refused to sign it so one of the most powerful countries did not join
Germany and Russia were banned and other countries who lost were also banned
Germany was eventually allowed to join however Hitler removed Germany. Japan and Italy also left after they invaded other countries
When the league was founded there were 42 members which increased to 58 by 1934 with Britain, France, Italy and Japan being members of the council who made all of the important decisions
covenant of the league
covenant set out how the league would deal with aggression
- Mitigation - countries would come together to talk through problems
- Moral Condemnation - wrong countries would be told off
- Economic sanctions - league members would not trade with fighting countries
the league did not have an army so if it was necessary other countries would lend armed forces
Structure of the league - assembly
every member could send representatives to the assembly which met once a year, to discuss and and vote on matters
every country had an equal vote on the decision which had to be unanimous, otherwise it would be sent to the council
some things the assembly was in charge of:
deciding if a new country could join
election of judges to the permanent court of international justice
voting for non permanent members of the council
deciding how the leagues money should be spent
strengths - all members had one vote so stopped domination from one country
weakness - only met once per year
all votes had to be unanimous so decision making was slow
Structure of the league - the council
met more frequently than the assembly as it was fewer countries so could respond quicker to emergencies than the assembly
had 4 permanent members - Britain, France, Italy, Japan and 4 (later changed to 9) other non permanent countries who were elected for 3 years
council had veto (could stop a ruling with its vote) so could stop a unanimous vote from the assembly
strengths - met 5 times per year so decision making was quick
weakness - made some countries more powerful than others
was weak without the USA
overused the veto power
Structure of the league - the secretariat
was the civil service of the league (in charge of administration and organising any actions that the league wanted to achieve)
made up of a body of experts from different areas including finance who were responsible for carrying out any actions made by the league other than military
strengths - had talented experts
weakness - was expensive and grew too large as the league expanded its role
Structure of the league - special commissions
special groups put together to tackle issues the league was worried about.
examples:
International Labour organisation
Disarmament commission
health organisation
slavery commission
commission for refugees
other ones helped developing countries with economic issues and also supported minority groups
work of the international labour organisation
aimed to bring workers, employers and governments together to improve working conditions
successes - recommended banning of white lead in paint as is it was toxic
helped Greece to set up social insurance
77 countries agreed to set up minimum wage
failures - failed to stop children u14 working as members thought it would be too expensive
failed to make working days only 8 hours as again members thought it would be too expensive
work of the commission for refugees
aimed to return prisoners of war home and support refugees by improving camp conditions and returning them to their own countries once conflict had passed
successes - returned 85% of WW1 war prisoners
league helped 1.5 million people who fled Russia find new homes
helped refugees who fled from Greece and Turkey during a clash by finding new homes and providing docters
created the Nansen passport for refugees
Failures - tried to appoint a high commissioner for refugees who were Jewish but Germany refused to vote so it could not be passed
work of the Slavery commision
successes - investigated slavery around the world and created a slavery treaty to prevent slave trade in just one country freed 200,000 slaves
failures - slavery still continued in other countries and some areas of LoN members