battery Flashcards

1
Q

define battery

A

to intentionally or recklessly apply unlawful force to another.

there must be some force, touching is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is the actus reas of battery?

A

application of force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Thomas (1985)

A

Caretaker charged with indecent assault after touching the hem of a 12 year old girls skirt.

Whilst it was determined that there wasn’t an indecent act, it was decided that if you touch clothing whilst a person is wearing them, this is equivalent to touching them.

legal precedent- touching is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AR for battery- Unlawful force

A

lawful force: tap on the shoulder, jostling on public transport, police officers arresting,

any unlawful force is AR for battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Collins v Wilckock (1984)

A

2 police officers saw D soliciting. They asked her to get into the police car for questioning but she refused and walked away. One of the officers walked after to try to find out her identity and took hold of the of her arm to prevent her leaving. She became abusive and scratched the officers arm.
She was convicted of assaulting a police officer in the execution of his duty. She appealed and the court ruled that the officer had committed a battery against her as he was applying unlawful force (he was arresting her which would’ve been lawful force)

the court said that touching a person to get his attention was acceptable, provided there was no greater degree of physical contact was used than necessary. However physical restraint was unacceptable

legal precedent- unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

AR for battery- Indirect Act (key cases)

A

DPP v K (1990) and Haystead (2000)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DPP v K (1990)

A

D hid acid in a hand dryer in the bathroom

the next person to use the drier was sprayed with acid- this was held to be the indirect application of force.

legal precedent- Indirect application of force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Haystead (2000)

A

D caused a child to fall to the floor by punching the person holding the child.

D was guilt of battery - didn’t intend to injure child, but principle of transferred malice applies

legal precedent- Indirect Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mens rea for battery

A

Intention to apply unlawful physical force

OR

Recklessness that the force will be applied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is battery ? key notes

A

Purely an application of force, it must be unlawful and there is no requirement for V to have suffered any injury. If D applies force with intent / recklessness they are guilty of battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Section 39

A

Section 39 Assault (Common assault/battery/assault by beating) A section 39 assault is the catch all term for common assault, battery and assault by beating.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how long can you receive for assault / battery?

A

6 month imprisonment or £5000 fine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly