Basics Flashcards
What are three powers?
Federal judicial power (power of courts)
Federal legislative power (power of Congress)
Federal executive power (power of President)
What is federalism?
concept that there have to be limits on state and local govt power because there is a federal govt
What is the federal judicial power?
- defined by Art III of Const.
- justiciabilty requirement for cases and controversies: Fed Cts must decide actual cases and controversies and not render advisory opinions
What is required for case to be justiciable?
1) Standing: issue of whether P is proper party to bring matter to court
2) Ripeness: question of whether a fed ct may grant pre-enforcement review of statute or regulation (look to hardship that will be suffered without pre-enforcement review and fitness of issues and record for judicial review)
3) Mootness: if events after filing end P’s injury, case must be dismissed as moot–P must present a live controversy (but nonfrivolous money damages claim keeps case alive)
4) Political question doctrine: constitutional violations that fed ct will not adjudicate
In order for SCOTUS to hear a case, all justiciability requirements must be met
What is required for P to have standing?
1) injury: P must prove that he or she has been or will imminently be injured
- not established with mere ideological objection, P must have personally suffered injury, Ps seeking injunctive or declaratory relief must show likelihood of future harm
2) causation and redressability: P must prove that D caused injury so that favorable court decision is likely to remedy harm (if a ruling would have no effect, it would be an advisory opinion)
3) No third party standing: P cannot assert claims of third parties who are not before the court because P must present personally suffered injuries
4) no generalized grievances: P must not be suing solely as citizen or taxpayer
What are exceptions to no third party standing requirement?
1) it is allowed if there is a close relationship between P and injured third party so that P adequately represents 3P’s interests (e.g. Dr-Patient; but NOT non-custodial parent)
2) it is allowed if injured 3P is unlikely to assert their own rights
3) an org may sue for its members if a) members would have standing to sue and b) interests are germane to org’s purpose and c) neither claim nor relief requires participation of individual members
What are exceptions to no generalized grievances requirement?
1) taxpayers have standing to challenge government expenditures pursuant to federal statutes as violating the establishment clause (BUT no standing to challenge law granting tax credits to persons who contribute to orgs that provide scholarships to students who attend private schools–no transfer of govt funds so doesn’t fall under Establishment Clause exception)
2) person has standing as citizen to allege that federal action violates 10th A by interfering with powers reserved to states as long as person can show injury in fact and redressability
What are exceptions to mootness?
1) wrong is capable of repetition but evades review because of its inherently limited time duration [eg abortion]
2) voluntary cessation [D could start X up again]
3) class action suits [as long as one P is left, not moot]
What kinds of cases are dismissed as non-justiciable political questions?
1) if a case challenges the republican form of govt (Art IV, Sec 4)
2) challenges to President’s conduct of foreign policy
3) challenges to impeachment and removal process
4) challenges to partisan gerrymandering
How do cases get to SCOTUS?
virtually all come by writ of certiorari (all from state cts, all from US app. ct.)
- appeals exist for decisions of three-judge federal district courts
- SCOTUS has original and exclusive jx for suits between state govts
When can SCOTUS hear case?
generally only after there has been a final judgment of highest state ct or US ct app., or 3 judge fed district ct [the final judgment rule]
What must there not be for SC to review state court decision?
there must not be independent and adequate state law ground
Lower federal court review?
a) fed cts and state cts may not hear suits against state govts (no immunity for local govts though) –> principle of sovereign immunity: 11th A bars suits against states in fed cts so state govts cannot generally be named as Ds in fed ct cases; sov imm bars suits against states in state cts or federal agencies and even on federal law claims
b) suits against state officers are allowed even if state cannot be named as D (officers can be sued for injunctive relief, money damages paid out of their pocket) but cannot be sued if state treasury will pay damages
c) fed cts may not enjoin pending state ct proceedings
Exceptions to immunity for state govts? when can states by sued?
1) when state waives immunity (expressly consents to be sued)
2) pursuant to federal laws adopted under 14th A Sec 5
3) fed govt may sue state govt
Note: 11th A sov imm protection doesn’t apply to US Bankruptcy Cts
What are Congress’ three big powers?
1) taxing
2) spending
3) commerce