Basic Vocabulary Flashcards

1
Q

law

A

any binding custom or practice of a community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

statute

A

law created by legislature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

regulation

A

law created by executive agencies to implement statutory law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

case law

A

law created by judiciary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Three types of case law

A

1) common law
2) interpretation of a constitution, statute, or regulation
3) applying the law to a new set of facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

common law

A

body of law wholly developed by judicial decisions (a form of case law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

executive order

A

law created by the chief executive that implements or interprets a statute, constitutional provision, or a treaty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

primary authority

A

law from any branch of government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

precedent/binding authority/mandatory authority

A

law from within the governing jurisdiction (a type of primary authority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

secondary authority

A

commentary about the law, not binding (e.g. legal encyclopedias, law review articles, treatises)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

persuasive authority

A

law from other jurisdictions (a type of secondary authority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

legislative history

A

the record that develops as an idea makes its way through the legislative process and becomes a statute (if/when the language of the statute is unclear, can be used to determine the intended purpose of the statute)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

three fundamental principles of our legal system

A

1) jurisdiction
2) hierarchical structure of the courts
3) stare decisis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

jurisdiction

A

an area of authority over which a governing body has control (starting point of legal research and analysis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

three sovereigns in the United States

A

1) United States Government
2) state governments
3) tribal nations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

three tiers of the judicial hierarchy

A

1) trial court
2) intermediate appellate
3) final appellate court, highest appellate court, or “court of last resort”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

“as of right” appeal

A

any party who is not satisfied by the result from a trial court can have the intermediate appellate court review the decision of the trial court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

decisions of higher courts in the same jurisdiction

A

mandatory authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

decisions of lower courts in the same jurisdiction

A

persuasive authority to higher courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

writ of certiorari

A

order from the final appellate court to the intermediate appellate to deliver its record in a case to the highest court so that the highest court may review it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

final appellate court’s reason for “granting cert”

A

If the highest court believes that reviewing the intermediate court’s decision will resolve a novel or important legal issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

federal trial courts

A

United States District Courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Kansas trial courts

A

Kansas District Courts

24
Q

Missouri trial courts

A

Missouri Circuit Courts

25
federal intermediate appellate courts
circuit courts of appeals (e.g. the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth District)
26
federal final appellate court
Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)
27
kinds of appeals heard by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
appeals from specialized courts (e.g. Court of International Trade, U.S. Court of Federal Claims, U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans' Claims) and any appeal involving patent law
28
stare decisis
legal principle that requires a court to follow its own prior decisions when faced with the same legal issue (triggered by precedent)
29
precedent
a binding prior court decision (triggers the legal principle of stare decisis)
30
precedential criteria
met when a case raises the same legal issue that was addressed in a prior decision meaning it 1) is governed by the same law and 2) has similar facts
31
precedential value
whether it can be demonstrated that the facts of a case are sufficiently similar to the facts that determined the outcome in a prior case
32
effects of the three principles of our legal system
1) create consistency and fairness (hierarchy, stare decisis) 2) create predictability (jurisdiction, stare decisis) 3) permits diversity (jurisdiction)
33
section
the fundamental unit of the federal statutory scheme and of each state's statutory scheme
34
statutory scheme
multiple interrelated sections of statutory law (e.g. title, article, chapter)
35
operative provisions
sections of a statutory scheme that explain the general rule, any exceptions to the rule, the consequences of violating the rule, and how the rule will be enforced
36
closing provisions
sections of a statutory scheme that identify the effective date of the statute and create severability
37
severability
the idea that if one part of a statutory scheme is determined invalid the rest of the scheme will remain valid
38
three component parts of statutes
1) elements 2) factors 3) red flag words
39
elements
requirements that must be met for a standard to be met
40
factor
considered when determining whether a standard is met
41
red flag words
words of relationship that restrict, expand, or order the elements of factors in a statute
42
judicial opinion
explains the dispute before the court, the legal questions the dispute raises, and the ruling the court has made on the legal questions
43
four parts of judicial opinions
1) preliminary information 2) facts 3) court's analysis 4) any concurring or dissenting opinion
44
plaintiff
party instigating a civil lawsuit
45
defendant
party being sued
46
appellant or petitioner
party who filed the appeal first
47
appellee or respondent
other party in a case being appealed, may also appeal some issues
48
trigger facts
facts on which the decisions of a court turns
49
procedural history
the legal path a case took after the plaintiff initiated the lawsuit
50
rule of a case
a general principle of law the case will represent in the greater body of law (not tied to the facts of the case before the court)
51
holding of a case
the court's answer to one of the questions presented by one of the parties in a case (tied to the facts of the case before the court)
52
reasoning of the case
the analysis the court follows to get from an issue to its holding about that issue
53
issue
one of the legal questions the court is asked to decide in a case
54
dicta
assertions or statements by the writing judge on points that are not necessary to address an issue presented by a party in a case (not a binding part of the opinion but may be relied upon as persuasive authority in future cases)
55
judgment or disposition
states the final action the court is taking on the whole case after considering all of the issues presented
56
concurring opinion
written by a judge who agrees with the outcome reached by the majority but who differs in the analytical approach, i.e. he differs in how to interpret the law or apply the law to the facts (typically not binding, may be considered binding if the majority needs the vote of the concurring judge to remain in the majority)
57
dissenting opinion
written by a judge who disagrees with the outcome of the case in which the judge explains why the majority was wrong or what the proper outcome of the case may be (not binding, may be persuasive authority)