basic elements Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the method for completing a basic elements scenario

A

1- read the scenario
2- identify the actus Reus
3- identify the men’s rea ( direct intention, indirect intention, recklessness, negligence)
4- causation (factual and legal)
5- intervening acts ( 3rd party, victim, medical, god)
6- thin scull test
7- transfer of malice
8- single transaction theory
9- conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 4 types of mens rea

A

direct intention
indirect intention
recklessness
negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is direct intention

A

where the defendant had clear foresight of the consequences of the action and specifically wanted that consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is indirect intention + case

A

where the defendant may not completely desire the consequence of there action e.g. death but there is virtual certainty of it happening
r v Nedrick 1986- created this idea of indirect intention
r v Woolin solidified this idea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is recklessness + case

A

when the defendant has taken an unjustified risk, looks at weather the risk was in the defendants mind at the time.
r v g and others - boys setting fire to co op

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is negligence + case

A

falling below the standard of the ordinary reasonable person
donague v Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 2 types of causation

A

factual and legal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is factual causation + case

A

uses the but for test
- but for the actions of the indiviaduyals would the outcome be the same
- if the defendant didnt do what they did would the out come be the same
- also looks at whether the original injury still caused the death
r v white - man poisoning mother but she had a heart attack first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is legal causation + case

A

has multiple parts
- mainly that the injury the defendant did must be the operating and substantial cause of death
- r v Jordan - defendant was stabbed, while at the hospital the victim was given a drug he was allergic to and died, the defendant was not liable for murder
- also looks at the thin skull rue and intervening acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is an intervening act

A

when the action of someone else not related to the defendant break the chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the 3 types of intervening acts

A

act of victim
act of 3rd party
act of medical negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is a case example of act of a victim intervening act

A

r v Roberts - gal was being assaulted in car so she jumped out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

case for medical negligence intervening act

A

r v Jordan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

case for act of 3rd party intervening act

A

r v padgett - man took gf hostage the police accidentally shot the gf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is te thijn skull test + case

A

defendant must take thee victim as they find them, if the victim dies from some physical condition the defendant did not know about there still liable for it.
r v blaue - woman was a jahovah witness and reforced a blood transfusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is transfer of malice + case

A

if the defendant had the actus reis and men’s rea to murder one person but accidentally kills someone else instead there still guilty
case - r v latimer - man in a puvb fight tryed to hit one man but hit a woman instead

17
Q

what is a single transaction offence

A

when multiple offences happen at the same time so they are treated the same as a single transaction offence