Barbri Lecture Deck Flashcards
What are the purposes of surviving the original petition?
- Give fair notice to the parties of the facts and legal theories
- Guides the trial judge for the purpose of admitting evidence and in charge the jury
What shall the petition state?
- Names and addresses of parties
- A short statement of cause of action sufficient to give fair notice of the claim involved
- The statement that damages sought are within the jurisdictional limit of the court; and a statement that the party seeks certain amount of monetary relief
- a demand for judgment on all other relief which the party deems himself entitled
By signing pleadings, attorneys and parties certify what?
That they have read the pleading and that to the best of their knowledge and belief formed after a reasonable inquiry, the pleadings are not groundless or brought in bad faith for harassment. If there is a finding of bad faith, the victim can file a motion for sanctions against the party or the attorney who signed the pleading. The range of sanctions includes awarding costs and attorney fees.
Suppose the plaintiff’s petition contains the following statement: “the unliquidated damages are within the jurisdictional limit of this court.” Is this an adequate allegation concerning damages and, if so, how can the defendant require the plaintiff to specify the maximum amount claimed?
No. In all claims for unliquidated damages, the petition may contain the statement that the damages sought are within the jurisdictional limit of the court, but the petition must also plead into one of the damages ranges.
The defendant may file what to seek specification of damages and asking the court to require the plaintiff to amend so as to specify the maximum amount claimed.
A special exception
Suppose plaintiff in injured in defendant’s store. Plaintiff files an original petition alleging injuries to his back and neck. Ten days before trial, plaintiff’s physician diagnoses injuries to plaintiff’s foot. Five days before trial, plaintiff files an emended petition seeking recovery of damages for injury to his foot. Defendant objects to the amendment. Should the court sustain the objection?
Yes. An amendment may be made without leave of court if it is made more than 7 days prior to trial. A motion seeking leave of court is required if the amended pleading is filed within 7 days.
Suppose plaintiff seeks leave of court to amend his pleadings. Should the court grant the motion?
No. Leave to amend should be denied if it adds a new cause of action or would cause surprise or prejudice to the defendant.
At trial, plaintiff offers evidence of his newly discovered injury without having filed an amended petition. Assume the evidence is admitted without objection. After close of the evidence, defendant objects to the charge to the jury claiming that the jury should not be allowed to consider evidence related to the injury to the foot because it is not supported by any pleading. What steps, if any, should plaintiff take to overcome the objection?
- Seek leave to file a trial amendment
- In this example, the court should allow the trial amendment because the defendant failed to object to the evidence offered at trial and the defendant will be found to have impliedly consented to trial of this issue.
At trial, plaintiff offers evidence of his newly discovered injury without have filed an amended petition. Suppose the defendant objects to the evidence during the trial as not being supported by the pleadings. How should the plaintiff respond to the objection?
The plaintiff should request leave to file a trial amendment.
The court should allow a trial amendment when presentation of the merits will be served and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the amendment would prejudice him in maintaining his action or defense.
In this example, where entirely new injuries would be added to the litigation, the defendant would probably satisfy this burden and the court would deny the plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a trial amendment.
If the trial court allows an amendment and the party opposing the amendment needs more time, that party should request a continuance to preserve error. If the party refuses an offer of continuance, the party what?
Waives his right to complain on appeal.
Suppose plaintiff sues defendants for breach of contract. Defendants assert that their agent did not have authority to enter into a contract with plaintiff. If plaintiff wants to assert “ratification” as a reply to lack of authority, how can plaintiff introduce this theory into the case?
A supplemental petition is used to reply to a defendant’s defense.
Suppose Paul’s petition properly complies with the requirements for filing a sworn account. David wants to dispute the quality and amount of materials supplied by Paul and the sums which Paul alleges he woes. What must David do in order to preserve his right to present his defenses to Paul’s claim at trial?
File a written denial under oath. Failure to file a verified denial prevents the defendant from denying the claim and waives the right to dispute ownership and the amount of the account.
Substantive due process requires that a state must have a constitutionally adequate basis for the exercise of personal jurisdiction. Constitutionally adequate grounds include what?
- Physical presence of the defendant in the forum state
- The defendant consents to the state’s exercise of personal jurisdiction
- The defendant has minimum contacts with the forum state.
Suppose Bob, a resident of Florida, is driving to California to visit friends. While stopping for gas in the Dallas area, Bob’s car hits Jerry as he was crossing the street. After the police cleared the accident scene, Bob continued to his destination. Bob had never been to Texas and doesn’t plan on returning. Jerry filed suit against Bob in the proper state district court of Texas. What basis exists for the exercising jurisdiction over Bob in Texas?
Minimum contacts. In order to properly allege that the non-resident defendant has minimum-contacts with Texas, Jerry must address three elements:
(i) the nonresident defendant or foreign corporation must purposefully do some act or consummate some transaction in Texas
(ii) The cause of action must arise from, or be connected with, this act or transaction (called specific jurisdiction); and
(iii) The assumption of jurisdiction by Texas must not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
Suppose Harry, a resident of Nieces County, travels to Florida for a vacation. While in Florida, Harry is injured in a BigCo store when a BigCo employee injures Harry while moving inventory in the store. BigCo, a Delaware corporation, has dozens of stores in Texas along with a regional distribution center. Is BigCo subject to jurisdiction is Texas?
BigCo is probably not subject to general jurisdiction in Texas. BigCo’s activities in Texas did not give rise to Harry’s claim nor are the activities connected with this incident. However, the second element of the minimum contacts test is useful in any case and necessary when the defendant has continuous and systematic contacts with the forum.