BAR FLASHCARDS - P13

1
Q

Bright-line rules for recording statutes (3)

A

RACE: B wins if records properly before A.
NOTICE: B wins if BFP when took (last BFP to take wins)
RACE-NOTICE: B wins if BFP and records properly before A.

• In a race jurisdiction, B wins, if he records properly before A does.
• In a notice jurisdiction, B wins if he was a BFP when he took, regardless of whether he records before A does. In a notice state, the last BFP to take wins.
• In a race-notice jurisdiction, B wins if B is a BFP and he records properly before A does.

In both a notice and race-notice state, to prevail in a recording system question B must demonstrate that when he took he was a BFP. A
BFP is one who purchases Blackacre for value without notice that someone else (in our model, A) got there first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What happens if a grantor is a double-dealer and conveys the very same parcel to more than one grantee? Who gets the property?

At common law?

Under the recording acts?

A subsequent BFP is not protected by the recording acts against WHICH interests?

A

What happens if a grantor is a double-dealer and conveys the very same parcel to more than one grantee? Who gets the property?

At common law, the rule was simple: first in time, first in right. In other words, whoever received the interest first was entitled to the property. The second grantee was out luck regardless of the circumstances.
Because this rule encouraged nefarious grantors to commit fraud by placing the losses on unsuspecting subsequent purchasers, the recording acts were enacted to protect bona fide purchasers from prior interests that they could not know about. Practically any kind of instrument affecting an interest in land can be recorded, including deeds, mortgages, contracts to convey, or judgments affecting title to property.

Recording gives notice to the world that title to property has been transferred. So, any subsequent purchaser will have constructive
(or record) notice of the conveyance. Because, as you’ll soon see, a bona fide purchaser by definition lacks notice of a prior conveyance, proper recording prevents a later taker from becoming a subsequent bona fide purchaser (“BFP”).

Note, however, that a subsequent BFP is not protected by the recording acts against interests that arise by operation of law (for example, prescriptive and implied easements, or title by adverse possession). Why? Because in such instances there is no instru- ment to record, so the recording acts do not apply and subsequent purchasers take subject to these interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

BONA FIDE PURCHASERS

A

To be a bona fide purchaser, a grantee must:
• Be a purchaser (or a mortgage lender), not one who received the property by gift, will, or inheritance
• Pay valuable consideration
• Take without notice (actual, constructive, or inquiry) of the prior conveyance

Bona fide purchasers prevail over prior transferees in notice jurisdic- tions. They also prevail in race-notice jurisdictions if they win the race to record. If the subsequent grantee does not qualify as a BFP, they are not protected by the recording act and the common law rule of first in time applies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“good faith” purchasers

A

Recording acts sometimes refer to “good faith” purchasers in place of bona fide purchasers.
You can treat these terms as synonymous (a good faith purchaser is one who acquires property for valuable consideration, in good faith, and without notice of another’s prior claim to the property).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Purchaser for Value.

Who is NOT protected?

A

The recording statutes protect purchasers. Donees, heirs, and devisees are not protected because they don’t give value.
a. Two Routine Value Questions
- The bargain basement sale:: yes, for value.
- The case of the doomed donee: recording statutes do not protect donees, heirs, or devisees unless the shelter rule applies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Notice

Types?
When?

A

“Without notice” means the purchaser had no actual, constructive (record), or inquiry notice of a prior conveyance at the time they paid consideration and received the interest. The three forms of notice that a buyer potentially may be charged with are:
A I R:

A: ACTUAL - B learns of A (literal knowledge)
I: INQUIRY: B charged with what inspection would’ve revealed (constructive notice)
R: RECORD: B on notice of deeds properly recorded in chain of title (constructive notice)

a. Actual Notice
What does actual notice mean?

b. Inquiry Notice: Whether he examines Blackacre prior to closing or not, B is on inquiry notice of whatever an examination of Blackacre would have revealed. He has a DUTY to inspect.
• The buyer of real estate has a duty to inspect the premises before transfer of title, to see, for example, whether anyone else is in possession.
• If another is in possession, B is charged with inquiry notice of that fact, regardless of whether B actually bothered to inspect or not.
• Thus, in our model of the double dealer, if A had taken pos- session, B would be on inquiry notice of that fact, thereby defeating B’s status as a BFP.
Inquiry notice also means that if a recorded instrument makes ref- erence to an unrecorded transaction, grantee is on inquiry notice of whatever a reasonable follow-up would have revealed.


c. Record Notice—Chain of Title
B is on record notice of A’s deed if, at the time B takes, A’s deed was properly recorded within the chain of title.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

subsequent purchaser will be..

A

Although no one has a legal duty to perform a title search, a subsequent purchaser will be charged with the notice that such a search would provide, whether or not she actually searches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In our model, what if A has not recorded, or has not recorded properly at the time B takes? Assume that B is a BFP. Does B win?
It depends on the type of recording statute the jurisdiction has enacted.

A

In a RACE state, B wins if he wins a race to record.

in a NOTICE state, B wins if he is the last BFP to take.

In a RACE-NOTICE state, B wins if he is a BFP and he records BEFORE A does.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

TYPES OF RECORDING ACTS

A

The examiners will not tell you which type of statute to apply; they will give you the language of the statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Race Statute

A

Race Statute
Under a pure race statute, notice of a prior conveyance by the grantor doesn’t matter. The first party to record wins. Only a few states have a pure race statute.
The language of a typical race statute looks like this: A conveyance of an estate in land shall not be valid against a subsequent purchaser for value unless the conveyance is first recorded.
- No requiremnt of BFP. Just first to record.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Notice Statute

A

Notice Statute
Under a notice statute, a subsequent purchaser who had no notice of a prior conveyance by the grantor will prevail over a prior grantee who failed to record. Typical notice statute language looks like this:
A conveyance of an interest in land, other than a lease for less than one year, shall not be valid against any subse- quent purchaser for value, without notice thereof, unless the conveyance is recorded.
- the last BFP to enter the fact wins, regardless of who wins the race to record.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The subsequent purchaser under a notice statute prevails WHEN?

A

The subsequent purchaser under a notice statute prevails even if they don’t record. As long as they had no notice of the prior conveyance, they win. But if they don’t want the same thing to happen to them, they will have to record to put other subsequent purchasers on notice of their interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Race-Notice Statute

A

Race-Notice Statute
To be protected under a race-notice statute, the subsequent purchaser must not have any notice of the prior grant and must record first. Typical race-notice language looks like this:

Any conveyance of an interest in land, other than a lease for less than one year, shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value, without notice thereof, whose convey- ance is first recorded.

  • to win: B must be a BFP AND win race to record!!!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

To be a BFP for purposes of protection of the recording statutes, the purchaser must….

at what time?

A

In determining who is a BFP for purposes of protection of the recording statutes, remember that the purchaser must be without notice at the time of conveyance.
It does not matter if she learns of an adverse claim after the conveyance but before recording.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How to spot the different statutes

A

An easy way to spot the different statutes is to look for the words “notice” and “first.”
• “First” only = race statute
• “Notice” only = notice statute
• “Notice” & “first” = race-notice statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Chain of Title

A

Sequence of recorded documents capable of giving record notice to later takers.

Back to our original model, note that in either a notice or race-no- tice jurisdiction, B’s status as a subsequent BFP would be defeated if A had promptly and properly recorded before B took. In other words, A’s proper recordation:
To give record notice to subsequent takers, the deed must be recorded PROPERLY, within the chain of title.

The chain of title is the sequence of recorded documents capable of giving record notice to subsequent takers.

17
Q

How is the chain of title established in most states?

A

Through a title search of the grantor-grantee index.

18
Q

chain of title problems: Transferees from BFP—The Shelter Rule

A

a. Transferees from BFP—The Shelter Rule
Anyone who takes from a BFP will prevail against any interest the BFP would have prevailed against.

In other words, the transferee “takes shelter” in the status of her transferor, and thereby “steps into the shoes” of the BFP even though she otherwise fails to meet the requirements of BFP status.
This is true even if the grantee had actual notice of a prior unrecorded conveyance.
What is the shelter rule trying to do? Protect B, by helping him transfer it.

19
Q

chain of title problems: The Problem of the Wild Deed

A

b. The Problem of the Wild Deed
A “wild deed” is a recorded deed that isn’t connected to the chain of title.
It doesn’t impart constructive notice because a subsequent purchaser could not feasibly find it.
(incapable of giving constructive notice).

O sells Blackacre to A, who does not record. Then, A sells to B. B records the A-to-B deed.
Is the A-to-B deed connected to the chain of title? NO, The A-to-B deed, therefore, is a wild deed.

• The rule of the wild deed: If a deed, entered on the records (A to B), has a grantor unconnected to the chain of title (O to A), the deed is a wild deed and is incapable of giving record notice of its existence.

O, our initial grantor and dirty double dealer, then sells Blackacre to C. Assume that C has no actual or inquiry knowledge of the O-to-A or A-to-B conveyances. C records. O has skipped town. In the contest of B vs. C, who prevails? C is the last BFP to take.
Does it matter whether this is a notice or race-notice jurisdiction?
Why does C win in a notice state? C is the last BFP to take.
Why does C win in a race-notice state? C is a BFP who wins the race to reord.
Remember: B’s recording is a nullity.

20
Q

chain of title problems: Estoppel By Deed

A

Grantor purpots to convey to grantee realty that they do NOT then own.
Grantor later acquires title to the property
Title automatically vests in grantee.
Grantor is estopped from denying validdity of preacquisition conveyance.
BUT, watch out for BFP: Early recording is outside chain of title.

21
Q

Estoppel by Deed EXAMPLE

A

In 1950, O owns Blackacre. He is thinking about selling it to X, but for now decides against it. In 1950, X, who does not own Blackacre, sells it anyway, to A. A records.
In 1960, O finally sells Blackacre to X. X records.
Estoppel by Deed now comes to A’s record. The 1960 O to X shoots back in time to redound to A’s benefit.
In 1970, X, a double dealer, sells Blackacre to B. B records.
• As between X and A, who owned Blackacre from 1960-1969? A, because of estoppel by deed.
The rule: One who conveys realty in which he has no interest (here, X back in 1950), is estopped from denying the validity of that convey- ance if he subsequently acquires the title that he had previously purported to transfer (here, the 1960 O to X sale).
• Who owns Blackacre in 1970? B, as long as he is a BFP.
• Why does B win in a notice state? Because he is the last BFP to take.
• Why does B win in a race-notice state? Because he is a BFP who records properly first.
B’s title searcher would not find A’s deed. Why not? A recorded too early
Remember: A’s 1950 recording is a nullity. A recorded too early. Thus, A’s deed won’t be connected to the chain of title. So, a grantee is entitled to assume that no one sells or conveys land until they first own it. Thus, B’s title searcher would have no reason to discover X’s 1950 pre-ownership transfer to A.