Bandura Variation Studies Flashcards
1
Q
Aim of Bandura Study (1963)
A
- To investigate whether a filmed model would have the same effect as a live model on children’s aggression
- To investigate whether cartoon aggression would have a similar impact to realistic filmed aggression
2
Q
Procedure of Bandura Study (1963)
A
- Laboratory experiment using an independent groups design (48 boys and 48 girls aged 39-52 months)
- Dependent variable was the level of aggression the child displayed
- Independent variable was the model:
Live aggression condition: Watch an adult aggress towards a Bobo doll
Filmed realistic aggression: Watched the same behaviour displayed on a screen
Cartoon aggression condition: Watched on TV a model dressed as a black cartoon cat perform the same aggressive behaviour towards a Bobo doll as in the other condition
Control group: Didn’t watch aggression - Then the same procedure as the original study
3
Q
Findings
A
- The 3 experimental groups all displayed increased aggression
- The differences between the 3 experimental groups were not significantly however they were significantly different compared to the control group
4
Q
Conclusion
A
- Exposure to live or filmed aggression increases the likelihood of aggression in response to frustration, even if it is modelled by a cartoon figure
5
Q
Aim of Bandura (1965)
A
- To consider whether reinforcement and punishment of an aggressive model would influence the aggression displayed by the observers in response to frustration
6
Q
Procedure
A
- The procedure was the same as previous studies
- Participants were 33 boys and 33 girls aged 42-71 months
- The independent variable was the observed consequence for the model
- The dependent variable was the aggression in the children
- The children was allocated 1 of the 3 conditions
Modelled rewarded condition: Children saw a second adult praise the model for their aggression and give them a drink and chocolate
Modelled punished condition: Second adult scolded the model and spanked with with a rolled by magazine
No consequence condition: Model was neither reinforcement nor punished - The children were then purposefully frustrated and taken into the playroom
- However all the groups were later offered attractive rewards to aggress towards the doll
7
Q
Finding
A
- Children in the model punished condition were significantly less aggressive than the other two groups
- However when introducing the promise of a reward, wiped out the difference, increasing the scores significantly for all the group
8
Q
Conclusion
A
- Punishment reduces imitated aggression
- However reinforcement is a more powerful influence on aggression
9
Q
Strength of Bandura variation study
A
- One strength is that the study had high internal validity
- The children were matched based on existing aggression, reducing the potential effect of individual differences in aggression
- Multiple conditions included non aggressive conditions allowed researchers to control spontaneous aggression
- The children were observed one at a time which avoids the issue for conformity effects in the children’s aggression
- These levels of control were useful as we can be reasonably sure that the observed aggression was a result of observed the aggressive models
10
Q
Weakness of Bandura variation study
A
- One weakness of the study is that it doesn’t provide an explanation for long term aggression
- Bandura only observed the immediate effects of observing aggression in children, having no explanation for whether those aggressive changes are long term or not
- We cannot know if the children will continue to apply this aggressive behaviour outside of this study
- The study does explanation how aggressive behaviour us learnt byt not information on how aggression is maintained