Bandura (procedure) Flashcards

1
Q

Why did Bandura decided to use young children as his sample?

A

Because they would regard any adult as role model and would be prepared to engage in extreme behaviour without self-restraint.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where were the children from?

A

Nursery School on Stamford University campus, mostly the children of older students or college staff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did he match the boys and girls on how aggressive they were?

A

Asked and experimenter and a nursery teacher to rate each child for aggression on a 5-point scale; groups created so that there were similar ranges of aggression in each.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the Model Room?

A

Children played with finger paints and stickers. Experimental groups observed an adult role model enter room and interact with 6ft tall bobo doll. Children observed role model go thorugh a pre-scripted routine; some role models attacked a “Bobo Doll”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the aggressive model do?

A
  • Pushed the doll over
  • Sat on it and punched it
  • Hit the doll on the head with a plastic mallet
  • Say aggressive phrases, e.g. “sock him on the nose!”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the non-aggressive model do?

A

Played quietly alongside children and ignored the Bobo Doll.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the Arousal Room?

A

Children taken to another room with many toys and given a few mins to play. Experimenter entered and told them the toys were for “other children” - so they were all in the same emotional state and experienced frustration, making them likely to act on any agg they felt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the Observation Room?

A

Children placed in room for 20 mins, with a mix of agg and non-agg toys. A 1 way mirror enabled 2 experimenters to observe children and tally behaviours on a checklist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What toys were in the Observation Room?

A
  • 3’ tall Bobo Doll.
  • Plastic mallet.
  • Gun that fired suckers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What behaviour did Bandura look for in the Observation Room?

A

Physical and verbal agg that…

  • Imitated the role model.
  • “Mallet aggression”.
  • “Gun play”.
  • Non-imitative aggression.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is meant by Non-imitative aggression?

A

Where children invented their own aggressive actions or phrases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How often did observers record the child’s behaviour?

A

Every 5 seconds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the aim of Bandura’s 1961 study?

A
  • Find out if children would show more agg behaviour if exposed to an agg role model, and vice versa.
  • See if children more likely to imitate a same sex role model and if boys were more agg than girls.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the sample of Bandura’s 1961 study?

A

72 children, 36 boys and 36 girls aged 3-5, recruited from Stanford Univerisy Nursery School.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the sample of Bandura’s 1961 study broken down into?

A

2 Experimental groups and a control group:

  • Agg role model: 24 P’s, split into M and F role model groups with 6 boys and 6 girls in each.
  • Non-agg role model: 24 P’s, split into M and F role model groups with 6 boys and 6 girls in each.
  • Control group no role model: 24 P’s.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the results of Bandura 1961?

A
  • Kids observing agg role model showed lot of verb and physical agg that resembled scripted routine the model acted out.
  • Very little agg in non-agg model cond and control cond;
    • around 70% had score of 0 for agg.
  • Children from non-agg model cond spent most time sitting quietly.
  • M role model had bigger influence than F:
    • agg M model produced more agg; non-agg M produced more calm.
17
Q

What are some important stats from Bandura’s 1961 study?

A
  • Boys’ physical agg after M agg role model was avg 25.8 acts compared to girls’ after F agg role model which was 5.5 acts.
  • Girls’ verbal agg after F agg role model was avg 13.7 compared to boys after M agg role model which was avg 12.7.
  • Control group, non-imitative agg is higher for boys (24.6) than girls (6.1).
18
Q

What are the conclusions from Bandura 1961?

A
  • Learning can be learned by imitation even if it’s not been reinforced.
  • M role model was more influential than F and boys’ showed greater tendency to engage in physical agg.
    • linked to cultural expectation.
  • Verbal agg was sex-typed, with girls imitating F role model and boys imitating male role model.
    • Suggests no strong cultural expectations, people will imitate the model they most indentify with.
  • Agg models seem to weaken social inhibitions.
19
Q

What do cultural expectations mean?

A

Bandura suggested even at a young age, boys and girls have learned what society expects them to behave like, based on TV, stories and family.

20
Q

Where can you see agg models weakening social inhibitions?

A

By comparing the model conditions to the control group who acted ‘naturally’ - Interesting to see how much Mallet agg and Gun Play went on in control group - presumably cultural expectations tell children they ought to play with mallets/guns in this way.