Baillargoen: Explanation of Infant Abilities Flashcards

1
Q

Who’s ideas did he challenge and how?

A

He challenged Piaget’s ideas abou the sensorimotor stage, proposing that infants have a fairly well-developed understanding of the physical world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What research did he conduct?

A

Violation of expectation research.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the research methodology?

A

24 infants were shown a tall and short rabbit passing behind a screen with a window.
Possible condition- Tall rabbit is seen behind the window, short isn’t.
Impossible condition- Neither rabbit is seen behind window.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the research findings?

A

Possible event- Looked for 25.11 seconds.

Impossible event- 33.07 seconds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do the research findings suggest?

A

That infants understand object permeance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What other studies did Baillargeon and Graber conduct?

A

Containment- If an object is placed in a container it will still be there when it’s opened.
Support- An object should fall when unsupported but not when on a horizontal surface.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Baillargeon’s theory of infant physical reasoning?

A

He proposed that infants are born with physical reasoning (we are hard-wired with a basic understanding of the physical world).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate Baillargeon’s study compared to Piaget’s research.

A

Baillargeon’s research is a better test of object permeance compared to Piaget as it eliminates confounding variables meaning it has better validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a problem using infants in research studies?

A

It’s hard to judge what an infant understands as:
We are guessing and can’t know the actual response.
They look for different lengths of time but it just shows us they think of the objects as different.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly