Bailey and Simon Flashcards

1
Q

Experience Mod

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Premium adjustements for relative frequency calculation

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Maldistribution

A

Exposure correlation (i.e. between territory and merit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Choosing premium base for frequency

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mod formula

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bailey and Simon assumptions for calculating R

A
  1. Class total claim frequency to ECY is the same each year
  2. Claim counts are Poisson distributed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R formula

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experience rating credibility dependencies

A

Volume of data

Variance of loss experience within a class (Experience rating distinguishes the individual risk from the class average risk)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2-year, 3-year credibilities relative to 1-year

A

The closer the 2- and 3- year relativities are to 2.0 and 3.0, respectively, the more stable the book:

1) Risks entering/exiting portfolio
2) Risk characteristics changing over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3 conclusions of Bailey and Simon paper

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Buhlmann credibility formula

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hazam conclusions

A
  1. Credibility increases in proportion to years only for low credibility values
  2. Simple Buhlmann credibility shows that double or triple the data doesn’t result in exactly double or triple credibility (since k does not change for different samples of n sizes taken from the X variable)

Z = n / (n + k)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

K, Buhlmann credibility

A

K = EVPV / VHM

= E[Var(X¦µ)] / Var(E[X¦µ])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why individual risk experience is more credible when there is m ore variance in loss experience

A

Experience rating distinguishes the individual risk from the class average risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly