BAIC 4 - Loss and Premium Adjustments Flashcards
Use of Multiplicative Factors
- Compensate for any incompleteness in our data (immature losses)
- Restate past data to reflect any expected changes between the past and the future
The two categories of data that actuaries adjust
- Losses and Claims
2. Premium and Exposures
Loss Adjustments Categories
- Loss Development Factors - Losses may change over their lifetime, so immature losses are developed to an ultimate basis
- Trend - Ultimate losses are projected into the future. Projections can be made for claim cost, claim frequency, etc.
- Unallocated Loss Adjustment Expense (ULAE) - An allowance is added for unallocated loss expenses usually in the form of a multiplicative factor
Reasons to develop losses
- Claim values change over time - loss payment estimates are made when the claim is reported. Estimates can be incorrect or new information can lead to revised estimates
- Claims Incurred but not reported (IBNR) - Not all claims are reported immediately so there is a lag between when an accident occurs and when a claim is filed (for whatever reason)
Actual Loss Development Triangle
Consists of several years of data and is an aggregate of many claims
Link Ratio
Measure of Growth (or shrinkage) of losses from one period to the next.
For example, a 27:15 link ratio measures the change in losses from the 15-month evaluation point to the 27-month evaluation point
Loss Development Factor
Described in terms of what time they represent development from and to
For example: An LDF for “15 to Ultimate” is a measure of how much losses are expected to increase from the 15-month age to the ultimate age. It is the product of the applicable link ratios
Tail Factor
The final link ratio, used for Ult:63 and will be provided
Trend Factor Consideration
- Internal vs. External Data - Internal data comes from a company’s own insurance experience; External Data comes from other sources like Federal Reserve data or the Boeckh construction price index (used for property insurance)
- Exponential Trend vs. Econometric Analysis
- Current Cost Factors vs. Trended Cost Factors - CCFs bring historical experience to the “current” level; TCFs bring “current” experience to the prospective level
Trend Adjustment Factor
(1 + trend) ^ trend period
trend = average annual percent change (annual trend)
Trend Period Calculation Terms
- Filing Effective Date - Date when the revised rates go into effect
- Filing Expiration Date = Date when the revised rates are superseded by another filings (often 0.5, 1, or 2 years after the original Filing Effective Date)
- Average Prospective Policy Effective Date - Midpoint of a policy written on the Average Prospective Policy Effective Date
- “Trend From” Date - Average loss date in the experience period
- “Trend To” Date - Same as Average Prospective Loss Date
- Trend Period - Difference between the trend from and trend to dates
Methods to calculate link ratios
- Arithmetic Mean (we use this)
- Mean of the last 5 factors
- “Best 3 of 5”
Trend Period Example
- What is the average loss date for Accident Year ending 6/30/2003?
- What is the average loss date for Policy Year ending 6/30/2003?
- 1/1/2003
2. 7/1/2002
Overlap Fallacy
The argument that applying both trend factors and loss development factors leads to excessive rates
- Loss development brings immature past losses to their ultimate value at the historical cost level.
- Trend restates ultimate past losses at future cost levels
Categories of Premium Adjustments
- Restating at Current Rate level - Past premiums are recalculated at the current rate level using the most recent rates
- Trend - Premiums may depend upon an exposure base that increases predictably (e.g. insured property value; gross sales). Expected increase in exposure must be taken into account when projecting future premiums
- Changes in Mix of Business - Ex: Consumer attitudes may shift (choosing deductibles of $1000 instead of $500)