BA4 Flashcards
CIMA Code of Ethics Aims
- Identify personal responsibility of a management accountant
- Provide practical guidance to avoid ethical pitfalls
- General guidance on difficult ethical questions
Morals
Refer to individual’s personal belief system about right or wrong.
Ethics
Professional responsibility to act in line with best practice (not necessarily rightly or wrongly). It is a practical course of action.
Section 110 - Fundamental Principles
- Integrity
- Objectivity
- Professional competence and due care
- Confidentiality
- Professional behaviour
Methods for ‘Controlling’ Behaviour
- Criminal law, direct threat to public
- Civil law, damage/loss caused to other people or failure to comply with voluntary contract
- Regulations, rules of practice
- Code of practice, guidance for practitioners
FRC
Financial Reporting Council are the independent regulator for corporate reporting and governance.
Principles of Public Life
- Selflessness
- Integrity
- Objectivity
- Accountability
- Openness
- Honesty
- Leadership
IFAC Code
Developed in 2005 following a growing crisis of confidence in the accounting profession. It is mandatory for all member organisations or bodies of IFAC.
CIMA Code
First issued in 2006 and is based on IFAC Ethics:
1. Complying with Code
2. Professional Accountants in Business
3. Professional Accountants in Public Practice
It is mandatory for all member organisations or bodies of CIMA.
IFAC Values
- Respect
- Timeliness
- Courtesy
- Responsibility
- Reliability
Fundamental Principles: Integrity
- Professional competency
- Honesty
- Truthfulness
- Open-mindedness
- Straightforward and fair dealings
Fundamental Principles: Objectivity
Consider:
- Biases
- Conflicts of interest
- Undue influence of others
Safeguards:
- Withdrawing from engagement
- Introducing more supervision
- Terminating the relationship
- Discussing with higher management
Fundamental Principles: Professional Competence
Maintain competence and capabilities to act responsibly at all times through continuing professional development.
Fundamental Principles: Due Care
Communicate to clients and employers the limitations inherent in the provided services to avoid misinterpretation.
Fundamental Principles: Confidentiality
Do not:
- Disclose information outside the firm or employing organisation, including socially
- Use information for personal or third-party gain
Fundamental Principles: Professional Behaviour
Behaviour should not bring the individual, the profession, or CIMA into disrepute:
- Comply with relevant laws and regulations
- Avoid any action that discredits the profession
Disclosure of Confidential Information
- Permitted by law and authorised by employer (e.g. contracts)
- Required by law (e.g. evidence)
- Professional duty when not prohibited by law (e.g. regulation)
Independence
Of mind: Conclusion should be prepared without being affected by influences which would compromise professional judgment.
In appearance: Outcomes need to be seen as fair, especially when impacting employee compensations for example. Define the framework before provided outcomes.
Scepticism
Maintain a healthy mistrust of management and information provided by vested interests.
Accountability
Being responsible to someone and for something or, an action and being able to explain those actions.
Social Responsibility
A professional’s role within the wider community.
Hierarchy of Obligations
- The law
- Your profession (CIMA Code)
- Your company (Corporate Values)
Resolving Ethical Issues
- Transparency:
a) Do I mind who knows about my decision?
b) Can I openly defend my stance? - Effect:
a) Have I identified whom the decision affects?
b) Have I taken everything into account, including mitigating circumstances? - Fairness:
a) Will my decisions be judged by others to be fair?
Corporate Governance (3 Points)
A system of controls and procedures to balance wants of various stakeholders across the business. It is primarily concerned with public companies to ensure:
- Effective control
- Business efficacy
- Accountability
Company Law
Made up of ethical principles and standards of behaviour which are written laws.
Circumventing the Law
Directors can break the law as:
- Investors do not actively participate in the internal affairs of the company, especially when they are achieving growth
- Investors are a disprate body and are therefore not united in their opinion or approach
Combined Code/UK Corporate Governance Code (description)
Contains code of best practice that public companies mark themselves against in a ‘comply or explain’ model to demonstrate to the market they are upholding good principles of corporate governance.
Cadbury Committee Report
Set up by the FRC in 1991:
- Independent non-exec directors
- Exec directors should be vetted by nomination committee of non-exec directors
- Exec directors should have a contract of no more than 3-years
- Exec director pay should be agreed by a remuneration committee of non-exec directors
- There should be an audit committee of non-exec directors
- Chairman and chief exec should not be the same person
Greenbury Committee Report
Following excessive remuneration:
- Remuneration committee should consider shareholders and directors
- Directors should not receive discounted share options and annual bonuses are non-pensionable
- Shareholders should approve long-term director incentives
- Exec directors should not have notice periods of more than a year
- Annual report should include a statement of measures against the Greenbury code and state areas on non-compliance
Hampel Committee Report
Published in 1998:
- Exec and non-exec directors should owe the same corporate duties and be provided with more information and instruction as to their responsibilities
- Exec directors should have relevant experience
- Majority of non-exec directors should be independent and make up 1/3 of board positions
- Chairman and chief exec should not be the same person
- Directors should seek re-election every 3 years
- Exec directors should not have notice periods of more than a year
- Exec director pay should not be excessive and is decided by remuneration committee made up entirely of non-exec directors
Turnbull Report
Published in 1999, board of directors should:
- Evaluate likely risks facing the company
- Ensuring that effective safeguards and internal controls are in place to reduce risk
- Implement transparent internal controls including an assessment of annual risk
Higgs Report
Published in 2003 in the US following the collapse of Enron. Highlighted group responsibility of the board and encouraged greater involvement of non-exec directors.
Combined Code/UK Corporate Governance Code (provisions)
Revised ~two years:
- Chairman and chief exec are different people
- Chief exec should not go on to become chairman of the same company
- At least half of the board should be independent, non-exec directors
- Board appoints one independent, non exec director to be senior independent director
- Nomination committee for board appointments
- Annual report should describe performance of board, its committees and directors
- Remuneration committee should have at least three independent, non-exec directors
- Notice periods should be less than a year
- Board should review group’s system risk management annually and inform shareholders
- Audit committee should have three (two for small orgs) independent, non-exec directors
Companies Act (CA)
Published in 2006, directors must:
- Promote the success of the organisation (172)
- Use powers judiciously
- Exercise the same care, skill and diligence that would be used by a reasonably diligent person (174)
Organisation’s Constitution
- Memorandum of Association
- Articles of Association
- Shareholder Agreement (private orgs only)
Unitary Boards
There is only one board responsible for management and governance. Structures include:
- All executive, managerial role for all directors
- Majority exec, most are effectively company employees
- Majority non-exec, most are not employees
Other Boards
- Unitary with combined functions, chairman and chief exec are the same person
- Management boards are headed by the chief exec
- Supervisory board headed by the chairman
The Board
Are to provide entrepeneurial leadership within a framework of prudent and effective controls which enables risk to be assessed and managed.
Assurance
A practitioner will express a conclusion designed to enhance the confidence the intented user has in the responsible party.
External Audit - Objectives
- Give a true and fair view
- Are prepared in accordance with applicable financial reporting frameworks
- Obtain reasonable assurance that documents are whole and free from misstatement
- Report on wider findings
External Audit - 5 Elements
- Parties involved (preparers/management, users/shareholders, practitioner/auditors)
- Subject matter and financial statements
- Sufficient appropriate evidence
- Alignment with relevant financial reporting framework
- Report presented to shareholders
Audit Risk
Auditor may come to an incorrect opinion.
Inherent Risk
Susceptibility of a transaction, account balance, or other materials to misstate, despite internal controls being in place.
Control Risk
That the misstatement would not be prevented, detected or corrected by the accounting and internal control systems.
Detection Risk
Auditor’s procedures will not detect a misstatement that exists in an account balance or class of transaction that could be material.
External Audit
- Express opinion on truth of financial statements
- Reports to shareholders
- Publicly available
- Verifies truth and fairness of financial statements
- Appointed by the company shareholders
- Must be independent of the company
Internal Audit
- Improve the company’s operations by reviewing efficiency and effectiveness
- Reports to management or those in governance positions
- Not publicly available
- Wide in scope and dependent on management’s requirements
- Appointed by audit committee or board of directors
- Can be run by employees (little independence) or outsourced (more independence)