B1 TOXICOLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY Flashcards
WHAT DOES LABELLING AND PACKAGING OF SUBSTANCES AND MIXTURES (CLP). REQUIRE MANUFACTORERS AND SUPPLIERS TO DO?
CLP implements the GHS within Europe law.
CLP requires manufacturers and suppliers to:
- Classify dangerous chemicals (using new GHS criteria).
- Notify the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of CLP classification.
- Label (using new GHS pictograms and statements).
- Package chemicals safely.
What are the aims of CLP?
AIMS OF CLP
Impose a duty on the manufacturers and suppliers of chemicals to:
Classify those chemicals according to their:
- physicochemical properties (e.g. explosive).
- health effects (e.g. irritant); and
- environmental effects (e.g. toxic to fish).
- Label the chemical appropriately.
- Package the chemical safely.
Define inhalable dust (or total inhalable dust):
“the fraction of airborne dust that enters the nose and mouth during breathing, and is therefore available for deposition in the respiratory tract”.
Define respirable dust?
“the fraction of airborne dust that penetrates to the gas exchange region of the lung”.
Typically, only dust particles of less than 7μm in diameter will reach the deep lung.
NB: 1μm = 1/1000 mm (1 x 10-3 mm)
Define thoracic dust?
The fraction of airborne dust that deposits in the conducting airways (trachea, bronchi and bronchioles) but does not penetrate to the terminal bronchioles or alveoli.
What are epidemiological studies?
Investigation of populations over a significant period of time – see how outcome of exposure unfolds over time.
What is a case-control study?
Compares people who already have a specific disease with those who do not (i.e. outcome selective).
retrospective (outcome known – looking back at events).
What is a cohort study?
Compares those exposed to suspected causes with those who are not (i.e. exposure selective).
May be retrospective or prospective (follow-up).
How does the case control study operate?
Comparison of CASE and CONTROL groups:
“CASE” – group who have disease/condition of interest.
“CONTROL” – group similar to case group except don’t have the disease.
Look at: exposure history, employment history, medical records, etc. to establish differences which might imply association between disease incidence and particular risk factors.
how does the prospective cohort study work?
Population selected for exposure characteristics (both initially free of the disease) and followed for period of time - then outcome (disease) measured.
Try to establish association between exposure and effect (e.g. exposure to asbestos and incidence of lung cancer).
Uses two groups (“cohorts”):
Exposed.
Unexposed (the control group).
Incidence of specific disease calculated for each group and statistically analysed.
If significantly more people develop the disease in exposed group – strongly suggestive of causal connection (though not absolute proof).
What is retrospective cohort study?
Population selected based on past exposure records, i.e. a historic cohort is assembled.
The current outcomes of that exposure are investigated for both exposed and unexposed cohorts.
Much quicker than prospective cohort study (“follow-up” period has already occurred in the past!)
What is toxicology?
The study of the adverse effects of chemicals on living organisms and the symptoms, mechanisms, detection and treatment of those effects.
advantages of animal testing?
Does not rely on exposing people to chemicals (no human disease/suffering involved).
Can be quicker/cheaper than epidemiology on humans.
Provides information that would otherwise be difficult to get.
Allows the long-term effects of exposure to low doses to be studied (chronic tests).
limitations of animal testing?
Variations between species – application of results to humans may be questionable.
Ethical issues.
Contributing factors (e.g. smoking, diet) will not be apparent in animal studies.
Lengthy and expensive.
alternatives to animal testing?
In-vitro studies:
E.g. Ames mutagenicity test.
Predictive studies:
Grouping and read-across.
Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) studies.
IN VITRO TEST:TESTING FOR MUTAGENIC POTENTIAL: THE AMES TEST FOR GENETIC MUTATION
Quick, cheap and easy – often as preliminary study to detailed animal study.
Uses bacteria (e.g. salmonella) genetically modified so needs histidine (an amino acid) to be able to multiply (normal strains of bacterium don’t need histidine).
Test bacteria initially incubated in histidine-deficient medium (so no growth takes place).
If mutagen added – causes genetic changes which reverse original genetic modification - bacteria can now grow/multiply.
i.e. GROWTH = Reverse Mutation =
Substance is mutagenic (and carcinogenic).
Can get false positive/negative results!