Avoiding Predation; Territoriality; Group-Living Flashcards
What are the predator avoiding techniques we discussed in lecture? (6 items)
- alarm calling
- predator distraction
- predator dilution
- Aposematism
- Mullerian and Batesian mimicry
- Camouflage
Name some anti-predator tactics that take advantage of the profitability equation or the rate of energy intake equation?
1) some animals can evolve harder shells or spiky armour to increase handling time
2) some animals can reduce body size to become harder to find - increases search time & also reduces amount of energy obtained
3) Some animals have evolved camouflage to become hard to find - increases search time
What is the difference between Batesian and Mullerian mimics?
Batesian mimics resemble unpalatable species, but are not actually unpalatable. Dishonest signal.
Mullerian mimcs resemble unpalatable species, and also are unpalatable.
Give an example of (a) Batesian mimicry and (b) Mullerian mimicry
a. ) Tephritid flies resemble jumping spiders
b. ) Heliconius butterflies all resemble one another, all unpalatable.
True or false. For every predatory tactic, there are tradeoffs associated with having the tactic.
true
What are some potential difficulties in evolving alarm calling or predator distraction?
How can these problems be addressed?
Problem:
- This kind of tactic draws predator attention from the group to yourself
- The predator could become less naive/more experienced and recognize purposeful distraction behaviours.
Solutions:
- Manipulate the frequency of the alarm calls that make it harder to locate where the sound comes from
- Alarm calls or distraction tactics may put you in danger, but ensure survival of your relatives and your genes within them.
- Alarm calls or distraction tactics can be reciprocated by your own relatives, benefiting you later
What is a search image?
A search image is something a predator develops, where they look for specific characteristics or features in order to find camouflaged prey.
What are some potential difficulties in evolving camouflage as a predation evasion tactic?
How can these problems be addressed?
Problems:
- predators can develop a search image to find you quicker
- it may be harder for you to find mates
- Complex to evolve because it may involve multiple loci
- environments can change, making you not camouflaged anymore
Solutions:
- Have many polymorphic forms of the camouflage, to make it difficult for predators to form a search image
- Try to find mates with non-visual cues - pheromones perhaps
- If the loci are closely linked, camouflage may be easier to evolve due to hitchhiking
- Adapt to camouflage in new environments
Give an example of an experiment portraying development of a search image?
Chickens improved the ability to find camouflaged rice grains (painted to match the background) in one experiment. They had developed a search image for the camouflaged rice grains.
What are some potential difficulties in evolving aposematism as a predation evasion tactic?
How can these problems be addressed?
Problems:
- Predator has a learning curve - it may eat you before realizing you’re toxic
- Energy cost to producing the toxin
- coloration may evolve before toxicity, making you more easy to see and yet not being unpalatable
Solutions:
- Predators could teach their young to avoid you, or you could adapt to a colour that is universally recognized by predators as dangerous. Also, even if you die, your relatives, that carry your genes, would be left alone because the predator has learned to avoid your species.
- You could obtain the toxin through your diet, avoiding having to make the toxin yourself and waste energy doing so.
- poison and colouration have shown to evolve more or less simultaneously
What are some potential difficulties in evolving Batesian Mimicry as a predation evasion tactic?
How can these problems be addressed?
Problems:
- the species being mimicked are at a disadvantage because predators could potentially think you’re palatable because your mimics are
- Complex trait to be evolved, needs multiple loci to be selected for.
- It could confuse mates not knowing if you’re their species or the mimic species
Solutions:
- The mimics could be less common than the species they are mimicking. negative frequency dependent selection can prevent the mimics from becoming common (because in negative frequency dependent selection, the most common phenotype gets selected against, because the more common it gets, the more it decreases fitness). Mimics can often mimic multiple model species, preventing the model species from being at a disadvantage. There’s also the dilution effect, which means if the mimics were more common than the model species, the model species are less likely to be predated on.
- Loci involved could be closely-linked, which makes it easier to evolve via hitch-hiking.
- Evolution of different ways to attract mates - pheromones maybe
Give an example of a type of mimic species that mimics multiple model species
A type of swallowtail butterfly comes in two morphs, each morph mimicking a DIFFERENT model species.
Interestingly, these two morphs cannot interbreed, because it would result in unfavourable intermediates, ensuring only these two morphs succeed.
What is negative frequency dependant selection?
The most common phenotype becomes less fit as it becomes more common, leading to natural selection to select against that common phenotype.
What are some potential difficulties in evolving Mullerian Mimicry as a predation evasion tactic?
How can these problems be addressed?
Problems:
- Complex trait, needs selection to occur at multiple loci
- Mates might get confused what species you are
- Learning curve for predators to learn the mimics are unpalatable
Solutions:
- Loci could be closely linked, allows evolution to be easier via hitchhiking
- You can evolve other species-specific signalling methods to find mates - pheromones maybe
- positive frequency dependent selection - As the mimic phenotype becomes more common, and they are all unpalatable, the predator learns to avoid this morph. The learning curve would therefore be faster.
True or false. Batesian mimicry is less of a problem if mimics are in greater numbers because of (1) the negative frequency dependent selection against them and (2) the dilution effect the model (actually toxic) species take advantage of because of them
True
Predator-prey interactions often lead to the evolution of _______ adaptations, leading to an evolutionary ______ race
Antagonistic, arms
In order to increase handling time, some species of prey have evolved running adaptations. Name the three types of running adaptations discussed in class.
- the foot bone to femur length ratio gets higher. Good runners have long foot bones, similar to the length of their femur.
- The fibula and tibia fuse for extra support
- prey can evolve to run on the tips of their toes (ungulates)
What is the Life-Dinner principle?
We often see that the selective pressures on the prey are stronger than on the predators when it comes to antagonistic evolution of predator evasion tactics. For example, prey evolve running adaptations much faster than predators. This is because of the Life-Dinner principle.
Selection pressure is stronger on the prey because they have their lives on the line, but for predators they simply have dinner on the line
In order to increase handling time and make themselves a less profitable food item, some prey have evolved adaptations for better body armour. Can you give an example?
Gastropod families have seen over the years a thickness in their shells, and a narrowing of the aperatures in their shells.
Habitats differ in quality, and there have been two models proposed to explain what habitat types animals choose, what are the names of these models?
- ) The Ideal Free Distribution model
2. ) The Ideal Despotic Distribution model
Describe the Ideal Free Distribution model.
After describing it, explain what we expect in the end.
This model explains that animals choose habitats based on habitat value (i.e. how resource-rich the habitat is).
Individuals will first occupy habitats of the highest quality first (has most resources),
but eventually these habitats get so saturated by individuals that the habitat value becomes equivalent to other habitats that were previously thought of as lower quality.
At this point, animals begin occupying the other habitats.
In the end we should have…
- more individuals in the initially “best” habitat
- resource per capita/per individual should be equal across all habitats (this model forms a Nash equilibrium)
Describe the Ideal Free Distribution (IFD) model.
After describing it, explain what we expect in the end.
This model explains that animals choose habitats based on habitat value (i.e. how resource-rich the habitat is).
Individuals will first occupy habitats of the highest quality first (has most resources),
but eventually these habitats get so saturated by individuals that the habitat value becomes equivalent to other habitats that were previously thought of as lower quality.
At this point, animals begin occupying the other habitats.
In the end we should have…
- more individuals in the initially “best” habitat
- resource per capita/per individual should be equal across all habitats (this model forms a Nash equilibrium)
What are the assumptions under the IFD (ideal free distribution) model? (2 points)
- Animals must be able to recognize the value of different habitats
- Animals must be allowed to freely move about, and no competitor can prevent others from inhabiting the habitat.
Describe the Ideal Despotic Distribution (IDD) model.
After describing it, explain what we expect in the end.
This model like the IFD model focuses on animals choosing habitats based on quality but, here, competition plays a role of conflict.
The stronger competitors will live in the better habitat, and EXCLUDE others from that habitat.
The weaker competitors are forced to reside in the poorer quality habitat.
In the end:
- The resource per individual is NOT equal! The individuals living in the higher quality habitat get more resources than those living in poorer quality habitats.
in one population of red-winged blackbirds…
There is one male who owns the biggest territory
The other males own similiar sized smaller territories
The large territory has 12 resource units (RUs)
The smaller territories have 4 resource units (RUs)
Females need at least 4 RU to produce 2 babies.
Strong female competitors would prefer 6 RU to produce 4 babies.
Describe what you would expect to see under the …
a) IFD (Ideal Free Distribution) model
b) IDD (Ideal Despotic Distribution) model
a)
Our end goal is to make sure all individuals have the same resource amount. Females need at least 4 RUs, so we need to make sure every bird has exactly 4 RUs.
the large territory has 12 RUs, so the number of females we can fit in is 12/4 = 3 females.
So in this scenario: 3 females in the big territory, and 1 female per small territory.
b)
Our end goal is to make sure the stronger competitors are in the larger territories. Strong female competitors require 6 RUs, so in our large territory we can have 12/6 = 2 strong female competitors.
The rest of the females are poorer competitors and will have to make do with 4 RUs, 1 female per smaller territory.
What is the difference between philopatry and dispersal?
Philopatry is when offspring remain in their place of birth.
Dispersal is when offspring do NOT remain in their place of birth, and migrate to find a new place to live.
Which is more common in most animal systems; dispersal or philopatry?
Dispersal
What are some costs to dispersal?
- energetically expensive to disperse
- unfamiliar environment might be poor in resources
- may not be adapted to new environment
- lose benefits of group-living or maternal care
- harder to find mates
What are some costs to philopatry?
- inbreeding
- competition with relatives for resources
- If the environment you were born in has many predators or many parasites, you are stuck having to deal with them.
What are the three hypotheses for why most animal systems prefer dispersal?
- Avoiding inbreeding
- Avoiding competition with relatives for RESOURCES
- Avoiding competition with relatives for MATES
For the following hypothesis for why dispersal is preferred:
“Avoiding inbreeding”
would you expect males, females or both to disperse under this hypothesis?
At least one sex needs to disperse, depending on whichever sex loses more from inbreeding
For the following hypothesis for why dispersal is preferred:
“Avoiding competition for resources”
would you expect males, females or both to disperse under this hypothesis?
Both males and females will need to disperse with equal probability
For the following hypothesis for why dispersal is preferred:
“Avoiding competition for mates”
would you expect males, females or both to disperse under this hypothesis?
The sex that must go through higher competition for mates must be the one dispersing. Often this is the male.
Define: home range
A home range is a general area where an individual spends most of their time. Home ranges are undefended areas.
Define territory
A territory is an area that is defended and exclusively used by an individual or group.
What are the two types of resources territories may have? Define them and give examples
Divisible resources and nondivisible resource.
divisible resource is a resource that the more you have, the more offspring you can produce..eg. food
a non-divisible resource is a resource that if you have none, you won’t reproduce…e.g. nest sites
If nest abundance is high, this means competition for this resource is ______(high/low), so in this scenario you would see ___________territories
high nest abundance = low competition
this means you’ll have contiguous (touching each other) territories.
What do contiguous territories look like?
It’s where territory boundaries are touching. Territories tend to be big and crowded.
If nest abundance is low, this means competition for this resource is _____(high/low), so in this scenario what kind of territory would you see? Will they be territorial?
Nest abundance is low = competition for this resource is HIGH
Animals won’t have territories, instead they will just be defending the nest.
When discussing the graphs with fitness on the y-axis and territory size on the x-axis, what kind of shape does the benefit curve have? Why?
It is a curve of diminishing returns.
This is because you do get access to more resources with territory size (which is the benefit) BUT you also increase the distance to bring food back to the nest with increased territory size.