Avd Macro I Flashcards
Economic growth according to Foley and Michl?
Economic growth is the cumulative increase in the productive power of human labor effort to meet human needs through changes in the scale and technology of production, the acquisition of skills and knowledge, and the accumulation of means of production such as tools, buildings, and transportation systems (Foley & Michl 2010:49)
What is one useful way to “to classify theories of economic growth?” (Foley and Michl)
“in terms of the key factor that they identify as limiting or constraining growth”
What are the main candidates for limitations on growth within theories of economic growth?
- natural resources (land),
- human resources (skilled and knowledgeable workers), 3. produced resources (capital),
- and aggregate monetary demand.
Who are the outstanding figures in classical political economy according to Foley and Michl?
Adam Smith (1723 – 1790), Thomas Malthus (1766 – 1834), and David Ricardo (1772 – 1823).
What is the basis of the classical political theory?
“the organization of production through a division of labor sustained by the exchange of products on markets” (Foley & Michl 2010:40)
How is the average rate of profit express and what is it a result of?
r = ( 1 – ω)ρ
r = average rate of profit
( 1 – ω) = profit share - wage share
ρ = the ratio of value-added to the value of the capital stock
The Cambridge critique
»Most of the debate is mathematical, but some major elements can be explained in simple terms and as part of the ‘aggregation problem’. That is, the critique of neoclassical capital theory might be summed up as saying that it suffers from the fallacy of composition, i.e., that we cannot simply jump from microeconomic conceptions to an understanding of production by society as a whole. The resolution of the debate, particularly how broad its implications are, has not been agreed upon by economists.« (from Wikipedia)
Secular variation
The secular variation of a time series is its long-term non-periodic variation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_variation). Quentin is what is long term.
Harrod-neutral
Harrod-neutral: Pure labor-saving (or labor-augmenting) technological change, which raises labor productivity 1/a0 but leaves capital productivity 1/a1 unchanged (thus, capital intensity k = a1/a0 rises). One can think of this as the adoption of new and improved machines that don’t produce more output per machine, but which can be operated by less workers. Named for 20th-century British economist Roy Harrod of Cambridge (Blecker & Setterfield, Book Manuscript, Draft of July 20, 2015: 21)
Hicks-neutral
Hicks-neutral: Factor-saving (augmenting) technological change, which raises the productivity of both labor and capital proportionately, so that 1/a0 and 1/a1 both rise by the same percentage and capital intensity k = a1/a0 remains unchanged. One can think of this as the adoption of new machines that are intrinsically more efficient (produce more out- put per machine) and also require less labor to operate them, in the same proportions. Named for another 20th-century British economist, John (J.R.) Hicks of Oxford (Blecker & Setterfield, Book Manuscript, Draft of July 20, 2015: 21)
Marx-biased
Marx-biased: Technological change that is labor-saving but capital-using, so that the productivity of labor 1/a0 rises but the productivity of capital 1/a1 actually falls and capital- intensity k = a1/a0 increases sharply. This refers to the replacement of labor by large-scale machinery that make labor more productive, but which raises capital costs even while reducing labor costs. This type of change is named for Marx (1867 [1976]), but was earlier anticipated by Ricardo (1821 [1951], chap. 31). (Blecker & Setterfield, Book Manuscript, Draft of July 20, 2015: 21)
Solow-neutral
Solow-neutral: Pure capital-saving technological change, which raises the productivity of capital 1/a1 but leaves the productivity of labor 1/a_0 unchanged so that capital-intensity k = a1/a_0 falls. A contemporary example is the adoption of newer, cheaper and more efficient computers, which lower capital equipment costs for employers, but still require the same number of workers to operate them. Although this is named for U.S. economist Robert M. Solow of MIT, the concept was anticipated by Marx in his recognition of capital-saving technological change as a “counteracting tendency” to his FTRP (Blecker & Setterfield, Book Manuscript, Draft of July 20, 2015: 21)
How are the foundations for growth theory different between the classical-Marxian framework later neoclassical models?
“The important point, however, is that the distinctive behavior of different social classes (especially in regard to saving) plays a crucial role in the classical-Marxian framework, and this provides a different foundation for growth theory than later neoclassical models founded upon the assumption of a single “representative agent” with a uniform type of saving behavior.” (Blecker & Setterfield, Book Manuscript, Draft of July 20, 2015: 1-2)
Describe Keynes’s liquidity preference function
“The LM curve describes equilibrium between the stock of real money balances and the demand for them (which Keynes called “liquidity preference,” providing the “L” in LM).” http://academic.reed.edu/economics/parker/314/Coursebook/Ch02.pdf()
What is argument made by Say’s Law?
“the argument that generalized overproduction of commodities in relation to demand is impossible in a market economy, plays a central role […] a willingness to deny or criticize Say’s Law is one of the hallmarks of economic heterodoxy, and an important token by which the orthodox recognize the heterodox. “ (Foley 1985, Say’s law in Marx and Keynes). Keynes ( 1936, p. 20) points out that a “third choice exists, namely, to hold money rather than spending it in any way” and Marx points out that “interval in time between the two complementary phases of complete metamorphosis of a commodity become too great” it can produce a crisis “Thus in both Marx and Keynes the first refutation of Say’s Law is at the formal level of pointing out that the existence of money creates the possibility of a crisis of general overproduction of (non-money) commodities.” (ibid)