Automatism Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is automatism?

A

A plea that the accused was acting in a state of unconsciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Differences from mental disorder?

A

Complete acquittal and lower burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What case shows it is difficult to prove without expert evidence?

A

Murphy v Napier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three requirements set out in Ross?

A

A total alienation of reason
Caused by external factors
Which the accused was not bound to foresee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case states that total alienation means an inability to appreciate the nature or wrongfulness of the conduct?

A

Cardle v Mulrainey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which cases state that it is a complete loss of self-control?

A

Ross and Sorely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are obvious examples of external causes?

A

Drugs and alchol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are not obvious causes?

A

Diabetes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is Hypo- or Hyper- glycemia termed an external factor?

A

Hypo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which cases state that Hypoglycemia is an external factor?

A

Macleod v Matheison - HMA v Watret non were successful but because they did not meet other requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case tells us that sleepwalking is considered automatism in Scotland?

A

Finegan v Heywood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which case states that falling asleep at wheel is not automatism?

A

Alexander v Dunn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which cases speak to the fact that if the accused is bound to foresee the consequences they will not establish automatism?

A

Ebsworth v HMA (50 paracetmol)

Finegan v Heywood (knew about condition).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly