Austrian Economics Flashcards
Carl Menger
put forward marginal utility theory in his principles of economics at the same time as Jevons and Walras
Ludwig Von Mises
- Human action (1949)
- based economics on praoeology
- economics consists of the deductive consequences of purposeful individual action
ie individual must be the unit of analysis hence scepticism towards macroeconomics, especially Keynesian version - Theory of money and credit postulated a business cycle driven by over-expansion of credit by banks
Friedrich von Hayek
The Road to Serfdom argued that too much government control of the economy led to total control, ‘serfdom’
‘Constitution of Liberty’ defined the fundamental principles of liberty & argued its necessity for civilisation, wealth and justice
Principle 1
Competition is a process not a state
- neoclassical economics with its equilibria and zero normal profits leaves out everything of importance
- you’re never in equilibrium
a) by the time you get there the equilibrium will have changed
b) an equilibrium is everyone is satisfied with their plans and don’t want to change their behaviour - but everyone has different information - can’t be aggregated so as to produce an equilibrium
- individuals have knowledge no one else can have
Principle 2
In particular individuales have tacit knowledge
a) can’t ride a bike by listening to an explanation
b) CEO’s well paid because of their tacit knowledge - if it didn’t exist new MBAs would be the best CEO’s
- and individuals information can’t be aggregated so as to produce an equilibrium because peoples economic actions reveal their information for the first time
Principle 3 - The Market
a) a market is a co-ordination mechanism for people with different knowledge
b) is a process of discovery - you don’t know in advance if A or B is more profitable and have to find out through market transactions
c) every entrepreneurial decision closes off another one so you never find out if you were maximising profits
d) because no one person has enough information, no one can plan the economy
Principle 4 - The Monopoly
It’s not a bad thing
- firms seek opportunities to differentiate themselves and earn monopoly profits until competitors catch up
- monopoly good so far as it gives firms an incentive to innovate and usually doesn’t last very long
Principle 5 - Down with Maths and the State
Hostility to maths in economics:
- maths focused on equilibrium
- maths focused on individuals maximising utility and firms maximising profits
- entrepreneurship and tacit knowledge left out
- hostile to state intervention
Principle 6 - Down with Macro
- Macrovariable (Y, P etc) are illegitimate and pointless aggregations of individual transactions
and Hong Kong decided…
Sir John Cowperthwaite, Financial secretary 1961-1971 to stop publishing GDP figures
Hayek and Spontaneous order - ‘order without design’
How did markets and institutions that make markets work begin?
Hayek said not because someone thought them up and planned them
- they evolved because they worked which is equally true of norms, standards of behaviour and ethics
- people adjust to each others behaviour and repeat their own and others practices until there is a system of accepted behaviour
ie morality = adjustment to other peoples circumstances and will thus change when circumstances change
This is how the economy works to Hayek in Eamonn Butler: “a free economy and a free society, though unplanned, are highly organised, the evolutionary product of our constant adaptation to each others values and actions
The Socialist Calculation debate
Started by Mises
- Market economy works because it uses the knowledge dispersed within it
- socialist economy: planner has much less knowledge
- in particular there’s no market for means of production (owned by the state) which therefore have no prices
- but prices direct resources to their best use (ie whoever will pay most for them)
- planner doesn’t have this information, thus no basis for pursuing one project rather than another
Lange argument against SCD
- you cant plan everything
- but you can still have a socialist economy that works:
State-owned plants must have:
- Produce at point where average costs are lowest
- Set price equal to marginal cost (neoclassical economics)
Hayek’s response to Lange
This would work in a static world in permanent equilibrium BUT: worlds not like that
- Lange as bad as the neoclassical: no room for learning, entrepreneurship or innovation
- Planners (who have to look at the whole economy) need more knowledge than entrepreneurs but have less
- even if same prices can be introduced into a planned economy, planners have no hope of keeping up with them as they change
- nor can entrepreneurs but they don’t need to - they only need to see the prices that concern them
Hayek’s example against Lange
someones discovers new use for tin
- demand up and thus price
- Mining companies produce more tin
- Users look for substitutes
so demand for substitutes foes up and so does price
so more substitutes produced etc
- prices have transmitted info about scarcity across the economy - businesses knew exactly as much as they needed to know
and this is before youve even got to the entrepreneurs role:
- spotting gaps in the market
- studying consumers before trying out new products
Modern socialist counterattack on Hayek
- Price signals aren’t always helpful or stabilising
- what if Hayek’s rise in tin prices caused a speculative bubble?
ie as price rises, supplies fall as people hoard tin in hope for further price rises
- Hayek’s target no longer exists (USSR broke up in 1991, Mae Tse-Tung died in 1976)