Auditing Exam 3 Flashcards
(132 cards)
What is Professional Skepticism?
A state of mind that is characterized by appropriate questioning and critical assessment of audit evidence
What applies professional skepticism?
Professional Judgement is often needed.
What is Professional Judgement?
Making informed decisions regarding obtaining auditing evidence and reaching conclusions based on this evidence
What makes professional judgement important?
Evaluating the reasonableness of various management estimates used in preparing financial statements
Skepticism?
Appropriate questioning and critical assessment of evidence
Judgement?
Application of training, knowledge, and experience in making informed decisions during audit
What prevents auditors from exercising good professional judgment in order to be professional skeptical?
Biases and Heuristics
External Factors/ Pressures
Not utilizing good judgement process/framework
Biases?
Systematic errors in judgement resulting from use of heuristics and/ or the influence of external factors
-> Can be conscious or sub-conscious
Heuristics?
Are mental shortcuts that make the judgement process more efficient and less cognitively demanding
-> Individuals make mental shortcuts every day
-> Mental shortcuts are not inherently bad
-> But can lead to biased judgement
What causes conscious bias?
Due to influences of some sort of self-interest. Judgement is biased because individual “wants” to reach a particular conclusion.
What causes Sub-conscious?
Can be due to mental shortcuts. Heuristics, which individuals take when making judgements.
Availability?
-> Using easily retrievable information (first thing to mind)
What is the risk with the heuristics?
Giving greater weight to easily retrievable information.
Representativeness
Determining that an item belongs to a population based on the extent that the item shares representative properties of the population.
Anchoring and Adjustment?
Occurs when making a judgement, you begin at a particular starting point and then adjust from the starting point based on the available information
Halo Effect
Auditor’s judgements about specific attributes of management can be influenced by their overall assessment of the organization.
-> If an auditor has an overall positive view of an organization, the halo effect could lead to under assessments, regarding the existence of accounting errors, and thus, ineffective audits.
Confirmation Bias?
Auditors often subconsciously search for and overweight evidence that is consistent with their expectations.
->A client’s inventory has significantly increased
-> The client has not had a misstatement in several years.
Self-serving Biases affecting Auditors?
Auditor judgement can be biased in a manner consistent with their self-interest. Typically, this means that the auditor will be more likely to judge client- preferred accounting methods as appropriate for several reasons
-> Does not want to upset management due to long-term friendships
->Identify problems could lead to working longer hours and potential budget overruns
->Substantial estimation in financial statements creates substantial room for rationalization and bias.
Overconfidence?
Unwarranted confidence in one’s ability to make a decision
Strategies for Specific Heuristics/Biases
Availability-> Consider why something comes to mind, consider alternative explanations
Confirmation-> Consider alternative explanations, Consider disconfirming evidence
Anchoring-> Develop an independent judgement without an anchor, Consider alternative anchors, Consult with others without giving them an anchor
Overconfidence-> Challenges reasons for confidence
Why do accountants not always exercise good Professional judgement?
Heuristics and Biases
External Factors/ Pressures
External Factors
Client Demands-> Avoid delivering “Bad News”, Deadlines, Fees
Regulatory Expectations-> Accounting Regulators
Professional Judgement Framework?
Training-> Awareness of heuristics and biases
Decision Support Tools-> Judgement frameworks and those tailored to specific accounting judgements
-> Group decision making and consultation
Applying Professional Skepticism
->Recognize the biases and heuristics that you bring to your decision making
-> Inquiry alone is never enough. The auditor must obtain sufficient corroborative evidence
-> Unusual financial trends need investigation
->Documents need to checked for authenticity or possible alteration.
-> Ask questions, get answers, then verify the answers