Audit reports II Flashcards
The requirement for audit evidence
Sufficient and appropriate
The requirement for audit evidence
Sufficient and appropriate
Subsequent events are
Material events or transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date, but prior to the issuance of the F/S that require adjustment to OR disclosure(两种类型EVENTS) in the F/S.
Subsequent events not include
Sales occurring after year-end
If an omitted audit procedure is discovered, the auditor should
- Access the importance of the omitted procedure to the auditor’s PRESENT ABILITY to support the opinion. it might be the case that other audit procedures tended to COMPENSATE for the omitted procedure. in which no further action would be necessary.
- If no other procedures compensated for the missing one, the auditor would need to determine whether there were person relying on the F/S
- 如果第一项compensation没有达成,且第二项达成有人使用依赖F/S, the auditor would request permission to perform substantive procedures.
U.S GAAP identified two types of subsequent events, they are
Type I events, conditions existing ON or BEFORE the balance sheet date, an ADJUSTMENT to the F/S is usually required. Type II event, conditions existing AFTER the balance sheet date, require NO adjustment to the F/S but may require significant additional disclosure.
Certain limited procedures should be applied to REQUITED SUPPLEMENTARY INFO
The required supplementary info is an essential part of F/S, but this info need NOT be audited. However, the audit report on the F/S should include an OTHER-MATTER paragraph to explain such info.
An auditor is not responsible for determining whether other info in documents containing the audited F.S and the auditor’s report is properly stated.
However, the auditor should read the other info and consider whether any material inconsistencies or material misstatement of fact. An other-matter paragraph DISCLAIMING an opinion on the other info is optional .
The engagement should performed in accordance with
AICPA standards not SSARS.
Changes in accounting estimate ( depreciation method) or correction of error (数学错误等)
DO NOT affect the consistency standard.
If an accounting change has NO MATERIAL EFFECT on the comparability of the F/S
The auditor DOES NOT need to recognize (refer) to consistency in the auditor’s report
If an accounting change has MATERIAL EFFECT on the comparability of the F/S
The change would be referred to in an emphasis-of-matter paragraph in
When QUALIFYING an opinion due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence(GAAS) or due to inadequate disclosure(GAAP), the auditor should should refer the situation or omission
In the BASIS FOR QUALIFIED OPINION paragraph PRECEDING the opinion paragraph and in the OPINION paragraph, but NOT IN the management’s or auditor ‘s responsibility paragraph.
When disclaiming an opinion due to an client-imposed scope limitation, an auditor should indicate in a separate paragraph why the audit did not comply with GAAS,
But auditor’s responsibility paragraph and opinion paragraph are NOT OMITTED.
A scope limitation is a departure from GAAS NOT GAAP. The wording in the qualified opinion paragraph regrading scope limitation should indicate that
The qualification pertains to the possible effects on the F/S and not to the scope limitation itself.