Audit Procedures Flashcards

1
Q

Mention Tax Audit Procedures !

A
  1. Notice
  2. Meeting
  3. Document Landing
  4. Sealing
  5. Rejection (Taxpayer)
  6. Rejection (Tax Auditor)
  7. Reason to Reject
  8. Audit Results
  9. Close Conference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain meaning and the type of “Notice” !

A

Notice = the taxpayer officially inform that the “ taxpayer will be audited”

2 type :
- Office Audit : Taxpayer go to tax office and bring the doc
- Field Audit : Auditor go to the business location / taxpayer office to conduct audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What the Key Points of “Meeting”?

A
  1. ” Explanation by Auditor “
    - Reason & Objectives ( why audits being done )
    - Rights & Obligation ( what the taxpayer need to do : before and after audit ? )
  2. ” Taxpayer Rights “
    - Can request additional meetings , if they need further “clarification” , so both parties can agree on certain “condition / adjustment “ during the audit.
  3. ” Review and Records “
    - Auditor may ask to “review” the taxpayers : book , document , and other records ( that are necessary for the audit )
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the reason of “Meeting”?

A

To clarify key points about the audit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain what is “Document Landing” ?

A

Document Landing = process where the auditor submit request , and the taxpayer allows access to key documents needed for the audit , either : physically or electronically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How the auditor request doc in “Document Landing” ?

A
  1. ” Request of Data “
    - taxpayer must provided “requested doc” ; by bring them to the audit location ( either : office or field )
  2. ” Letter of Borrowing List “
    - If : auditor needs to borrow data for further review
    issue : formal letter (list : borrowed docs)
  3. ” Special Equipment “
    - Sometimes auditor need to access data : electronic / online systems ( taxpayer must provide access if requested )
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the Reason of “Sealing” ?

A
  1. “Tax Inspector is Not Granted Permission”
    - tax payer refuse to let tax auditor to “examine key data / areas”, such as : - land , - building, - records (exp : Financial Statement )
    - seal (area / records) : prevent : tempering
  2. “Taxpayer Decline to Assist”
    -Taxpayer refuse to help with the audit process , make the auditor difficult to access necessary information
    - seal (data) : ensure data is preserved without taxpayer inteference
  3. “Security Measures are Required”
    - required before lastponed : because : no authorized person / taxpayer present
  4. “Employee or Adult Representative Are Absent”
    - employee / family member (representative) : unavailable / unwilling to cope
    - seal ( data / audit material ) : prevent : tempering
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain what is “Sealing” ?

A

PMK 17 / PMK 0.3 / 2023 : tax auditor have authority to seal -> to : get access & secures it .
To ensure that it is not tempered / lost / destroyed /… during audit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

( Simple ) State “Rejection (Taxpayer)” !

A
  1. Unfair
  2. Access to records : unreasonable
  3. Inquiry cost is high
  1. Filling A rejection Statement
  2. Rejections regarding access of records
  3. Rejections of audit due to inquiry cost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Simple) Reason of “ Sealing “ ?

A
  1. taxpayer refuse : allow access
  2. taxpayer refuse : to help
  3. no authorized person is present : audit -> postponed
  4. taxpayer / responsible person : absent + refuse to cope , during audit
  1. Tax inspector not granted permission
  2. Taxpayer Decline to Asset
  3. Security Measures are Required
  4. Employee or Adult Representative Are Absent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Consequences of “ Rejection (Taxpayer) “ !

A
  1. legal action / escalation : fines, seal premises , seek court orders (suspect hidden docs and assets)
  2. Increased scrutiny : (repeated refusal -> will face stricter auditor in future)
  3. future relationship : damaged ( may deteriorate -> lead to : further complications )
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(Simple) State “Rejection (Tax Auditor)” !

A
  1. taxpayer refuse to corporate
  2. Reject : Denial Event ( Complaint )
  3. High Inquiry Cost
  1. Report on Denial of Examination
  2. Report on the Denial Event
  3. Rejection of Audit due to Inquiry Cost ( 1 month delay )
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Consequences of “ Rejection (Tax Auditor) “ !

A
  • Incomplete Information -> Higher tax ability estimated
  • Non compliance -> Penalties or Legal Action
  • Fraud suspicion -> Financial record (sealed) for future audit
  • Extended Obstruction -> Delays , Damaged relationship , Possible hostiity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(Simple) State the “Reason to Reject” !

A
  1. Refusal on Inspection / Ignoring the Invitation
    -Field : * refuse : onsite inspection (compliance & accuracy) of FS
    -Office : *ignore : formal invitation (meeting for discussion)
  2. No Access
    - Auditor lack of access
    - Taxpayer’s Claim of Inaccessbility , because :
    -> doc loss
    -> no personeel
    -> no access and are in format , at time of audit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

State and Explain the step of “Audit Results” !

A
  1. SPHP -> send after audit done (to : taxpayer)
  2. LHP -> STP/SKP (inside SPHP)
  3. No SPHP -> if reject audit
  4. Taxpayer’s Response -> comply letter’s content as response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How long the “ Close Conference “ take place ?

A

6 months ; 2 month extension

review findings & issue , can clarify + add info ( to resolve any disputes (before) “final audit report” issued.