AUD 1 Flashcards
3 major parts of
professional code of conduct
- Members in public practice (MIPPs)
- Members in business (MIBs)
- Other members (OMs)
6 principles of professional conduct
- Responsibility
- Public Interest
- Integrity
- Objectivity & Independence
- Due Care
- Scope & Nature of Services
RESPONSIBILITY principle
General/3 actions
exercise professional and moral judgments, cooperate to:
- improve the art of accounting
- maintain the public’s confidence, and
- carry out the profession’s special responsibilities for self-governance
PUBLIC INTEREST principle
3 obligations
- act in a way that will serve the public interest,
- honor the public trust, and
- demonstrate a commitment to professionalism.
INTEGRITY principle
2 points
Integrity is measured in terms of what is right and just
members should always ask “Am I doing what a person of integrity would do?”
OBJECTIVITY and INDEPENDENCE principle
3 points
A member should
- maintain objectivity and
- be free of conflicts of interest
Objectivity is a state of mind” that requires: impartiality, intellectual honesty, and freedom from conflicts of interest.
Independence: applies only to MIPPs (auditing, in fact/appearance) *but all members performing all services must act w/ objectivity and integrity
DUE CARE principle
(3 actions)
2 definitions
A member should (to the best of the member’s ability)
- observe the profession’s technical and ethical standards,
- improve competence and the quality of services, and
- discharge professional responsibility.
COMPETENCE requires a commitment to continued learning
DUE CARE entails
- Adequate planning of engagements
- Supervision of professional activities for which members are responsible
SCOPE and NATURE OF SERVICES principle
3 min actions
- Practice in firms w/ good internal quality control procedures
- determine whether the scope/nature of services would create a conflict of interest,
- assess whether a contemplated activity is consistent with their role as professionals.
PARTNER EQUIVALENT
Not a partner, but EITHER has
- ultimate responsibility for the conduct of an attest engagement or
- authority to bind the firm to conduct an attest engagement
**so would have to live up to the same standards that a partner would have to
PUBLIC PRACTICE consists of the performance of…
- professional services (e.g., audit, tax, consulting) for a client by a member or the member’s firm.
- Government audits
3 main steps to applying conceptual framework
- Identify threats. (7)
- Evaluate the significance of the threats –> acceptable level?
- Identify and apply safeguards. (3)
CATEGORIES of THREATS (7)
To integrity/objectivty
- Adverse interest (lawsuit)
- Advocacy (objectivity)
- Familiarity (employ relative/friend)
- Management participation (helps manage)
- Self-interest (financial pressure)
- Self-review (own work)
- Undue Influence (threats of w/hold work)
SAFEGUARDS to threats in applying Conceptual Framework (3)
- Safeguards created by the profession, legislation, or regulation.
- Training, standards, reviews, legislations, licensing, resources
- Safeguards implemented by the client.
- Management have knowledge/experience/ethical
- Policies for compliance, fair reporting, ethics
- Governance, audit committee
- Safeguards implemented by the firm.:
- Leadership emphasizing compliance, public interest
- Policies and procedures
- Quality control system
- Rotation of senior personnel
CONFLICTS of INTEREST
- Evaluation
- 2 types
- How to REDUCE to acceptable level
In evaluating possible conflicts of interest, members should ask:
Would a reasonable and informed third party conclude that a conflict exists?
2 types
- Client A vs Client B: Between interests of two clients
- Firm/members vs Client: Between interests of client on one hand and firm and/or its members on the other.
REDUCE to acceptable levels
- full disclosure to client
- client consents
DIRECTOR POSITION
- What threat
- 2 actions
Objectivity
2 Actions:
- Apply Conceptual Framework to determine whether the threat is unacceptably high.
- Preferable to serve as a consultant to board NOT joining board
GIFTS and ENTERTAINMENT
- What threat (2)
- Violations (2)
- Final determination
Objectivity and Integrity
Violation presumed if
- violate the member’s or client’s policies or applicable laws and regulations and
- The member knows or is reckless in not knowing of the violation.
FINAL
- If no rules are violated, then determine if “REASONABLE in the circumstances.”
- Reasonable based on *nature, occasion, cost/value, if assoc w/ conduct of business
PREPARATION and REPORTING INFO
3 examples of violations
- made or allowed material or misleading entries in FS or records
- not corrected misstatements when had authority
- signed, permitted, or directed another to sign misleading docs
What is SUBORDIATION of JUDGMENT
And proper procedure
If disagree w/ superior but still do what superior wants
Procedure
- Evaluate if threat is at an unacceptable level, if would result in a material misrepresentation or legal violation.
- If no, then no further action
- If yes, discuss the matter with the supervisor, and go over head if nec
- If not addressed up mgt chain, then invoke the following safeguards:
- Look for any additional requirements for reporting differences of opinion w/in firms policies and procedures
- Determine if is a duty to report to external authorities.
- Consult legal counsel.
- Fully document the situation.
- If cannot be reduced to an acceptable level, consider quitting the firm and try to eliminate exposure to subordination of judgment.
- Consider quitting (not required but allowed to)
- Doesn’t discharge all obligations, such as to report to regulatory authorities or an external auditor.
CLIENT ADVOCACY
- When allowed
- threats
- NO if doing attest work clients.
- YES if providing nonattest services (ie: tax work, advisory)
should not threaten OBJECTIVITY or INTEGRITY:
- exceed performance stds
- exceed reasonable practice
- compromise credibility
THIRD-PARTY SERVICE PROVIDER (TSP)
- Threats
- Permitted activities
- Safeguards
Threats:
- objectivity
- integrity.
Permitted:
- Mere administrative support (e.g., record storage, software application hosting, authorized e-file transmittal services)
Safeguards if substantive services outsourced,
- notify client before any confidential info provided to TSP
- if the client objects, the member should:
- Not outsource, or
- Decline the engagement
GENERAL STANDARDS (4)
- Professional competence
- Due professional care (not nec perfect)
- planning and supervision
- sufficient reasonable data
COMPETENCE
2 requirements
- member or his/or her staff has appropriate technical qualifications and
- the member can supervise and evaluate quality of work performed.
Departure from GAAP allowed
- 3 exceptions
- 2 not allowed
- When permitted
Exceptions
- if following GAAP would mislead (b/c new events w/o GAAP)
- new legislation
- evolution of new form of business
Not justified
- unusual degree of materiality
- conflicting business practice
PERMITTED: when other accounting principles apply
- Foreign country
- Prescribed by contract
- Required by law or regulatory agency
DISCREDITABLE ACTS examples
- Discrimination
- Exam questions
- Failure to file/pay tax
- Negligence
- Material departure from audit stds
- Confidential info
- False promoting/mkting