Attempts To Commit An Offence Flashcards

1
Q

Attempts Legislation

A

Section 72 Crimes Act 1961
(1)
Anyone,
Having an intent to commit an offence,
Does or omits an act,
For the purpose of accomplishing his objective.
(Is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must you prove for attempts

A
  • The identity of the suspects, and
  • They did, or omitted to do, something to achieve their object, and
  • That they intended to commit an offence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case Law has determined three elements/conditions that must be present for attempted offence - Must prove all three

A

Intent (Mens rea) - to commit an offence
Act (Actus Reus) - that they did, or omit to do, something for the purpose of accomplishing his objective.
Proximity - that their act or omission was sufficiently close

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Other than the three elements, What other additional requirement is needed for an attempts offence?

A

That it must be legally possible to commit the offence. Can be convicted of an offence that is physically impossible to commit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The intent of the offenders may be inferred from….

A

The act itself (what they did) and/or proved by admissions or confessions (what they said)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define: Act (Not defined in Crimes Act 1961)

A

To take action or do something, to bring about a particular result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define: Omission (Not defined in Crimes Act 1961)

A

The action of excluding or leaving out someone or something, a failure to fulfill a moral or legal obligation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case law’s for attempts

A

R v Ring, R v Harpur, Higgins v Police, Police v Jay, R v Donnelly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sufficiently Proximate - “All but” rule

A

Accused must have done or omitted to do some act that is/are sufficiently proximate to the full offence. Started to commit the offence and gone beyond the mere preparation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Examples of acts that may constitute an attempts.
(American Model Penal Code)

A
  • Lying in wait, searching for, or following the contemplated victim.
  • Enticing the victim to go to the scene of the contemplated crime.
  • Reconnoitering (recky) the scene of the contemplated crime.
  • Unlawfully entering a structure, vehicle, or enclosure in which it is contemplated that the crime will be committed.
  • Possessing, collecting, or fabricating materials to be employed on the commission of tye crime.
  • Soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of crime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case law for sufficiently proximate

A

R v Harpur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case law for inferring intent from the act - Attempts

A

R v Ring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A question of law - proximity for attempts.

A
  • 72(2) C.A 1961 highlights that proximity is a question of law, decided by a judge based on the assumption that the facts of the case are proved.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Elements that help determine proximity - Attempts

A

No clear definition, when considering proximity you must take into consideration Fact, Degree, Common sense, and the Seriousness of the offence in each case and looked at in their totality for case by case basis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Impossibility

A

A person can be convicted of an offence that was physically impossible to commit, but cannot be convicted of an offence that was legally impossible to commit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case law for Attempts, physically impossible.

A

Higgins v Police and Police v Jay

17
Q

Case law for Attempts, legally impossible.

A

R Donnelly

18
Q

When is an attempt complete.

A

When the defendant commits an act that is sufficiently proximate to the intended offence, even if they change their mind or make a voluntary withdrawal.

19
Q

What are three reasons why you are not able to charge with an attempt?

A
  • Where the criminality depends on recklessness or negligence, eg manslaughter
  • Am attempt to commit an offence is included within the definition of that offence, eg assault.
  • The offence is such that the act has to be completed in order for the offence to exist. Eg demands with menace.
20
Q

Filing of charges for attempts.

A

If you charge with full offence, only attempts was proven, can be convicted of attempting that offence.
If charged with attempts, found that full offence was committed, can only be convicted of attempts.

21
Q

Punishment for attempts

A

311(1) Crimes Act 1961
If not already prescribed by some other enactment, 10years for maximum of life, otherwise half.

311(2) Crimes Act 1961
Incites, counsels, or attempts to procure any person to commit an offence, when in fact it is not committed, liable to same as if attempted offence.