Attempt 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of homicide

A

the killing of a human being

Example sentence: Homicide is the unlawful killing of a person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Distinction between murder and manslaughter based on intention

A

specific vs. basic

Additional information: Murder requires specific intention to kill, while manslaughter only requires a basic intention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Definition of murder

A

a common law crime

Elements: sound memory, age of discretion, unlawful killing, causation, under the Queen’s peace.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mens Rea of Murder

A

Malice aforethought defined as the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm (GBH)

Example sentence: Malice aforethought is the mental state required for murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Direct intent

A

the defendant’s aim or purpose was to kill

Legal case reference: R v Mohan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Indirect intent

A

the defendant foresaw death or GBH as virtually certain

Legal case references: R v Woollin; R v Matthews and Alleyne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Actus Reus of Murder

A

Unlawful killing: excluding killings justified or authorized by law

Legal case reference: R v Cheshire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Human being

A

the victim must be a living person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Doctors, Euthanasia, and Double Effect

A

Potential liability for murder in euthanasia cases

Legal case reference: Re A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sentencing for Murder

A

Mandatory life sentence with minimum term set by the judge

Factors considered in determining the minimum term, such as the seriousness of the offence, aggravating and mitigating circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Introduction to Voluntary Manslaughter

A

A partial defence to murder, reducing the conviction to manslaughter

Definition: Requires satisfying the elements of murder but with mitigating circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Loss of Control

A

Replaced the former defence of provocation

Legal reference: sections 54-56 of the Coroners and Justices Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elements of the Defence

A

(a) Loss of self-control: Subjective test considering the defendant’s ability to act with considered judgment

Legal case references: R v Jewell; R v Dawes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Qualifying trigger

A

Fear of serious violence

Legal case references: R v Ward; R v Lodge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Objective test

A

A person of the defendant’s sex and age, with normal tolerance and self-restraint, might have reacted similarly in the circumstances

Legal case references: R v Meanza; R v Asmelash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Exclusions to the Defence

A

Self-induced loss of control

Example: revenge killings

17
Q

Diminished Responsibility

A

Defined in section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957, amended by section 52 of the Coroners and Justices Act 2009

18
Q

Elements of the Defence

A

(a) Abnormality of mental functioning: A state of mind significantly different from that of ordinary human beings

Legal case references: R v Byrne; R v Fairweather

19
Q

Intoxication and Diminished Responsibility

A

Voluntary intoxication alone is not sufficient

Legal case reference: R v Dowds

20
Q

Introduction to Involuntary Manslaughter

A

Occurs when the defendant does not have the mens rea for murder

Main types: unlawful act manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter

21
Q

Elements of the Offence

A

(a) The defendant must have committed an unlawful act (a crime)

Legal case references: R v Church; R v JM and SM

22
Q

Dangerous Act

A

Objective test: would a sober and reasonable person recognize the risk of some harm

Legal case reference: R v Bristow, Dunn and Delay

23
Q

Causation

A

Applying the normal rules of factual and legal causation

Example: considering whether the chain of causation is broken

24
Q

Gross Negligence Manslaughter

A

Existence of a duty of care owed by the defendant to the victim

Legal case references: Donoghue v Stevenson; R v Wacker; R v Evans

25
Q

What is the term for considering whether the chain of causation is broken in relation to a crime?

A

Intervening events

(R v Dalby; R v Kennedy)

26
Q

What are the elements of Gross Negligence Manslaughter?

A

Duty of care, Breach of duty, Risk of death, Causation, Grossly negligent

(R v Bateman; R v Misra and Srivastava; R v Lidar)

27
Q

What are the established duties for the Duty of Care in Gross Negligence Manslaughter?

A

Doctor-patient, employer-employee, etc.

General principle: foreseeability of risk to others

28
Q

What is the objective of the Grossly Negligent Breach in Gross Negligence Manslaughter?

A

Objective test with subjective elements: considering the defendant’s state of mind at the time

29
Q

What is the legal basis for the Insanity defence?

A

A full defence resulting in a special verdict of ‘not guilty by reason of insanity.’

Governed by the M’Naghten Rules (1843)

30
Q

What is required for the Automatism defence?

A

External cause, Complete loss of control

The defendant must have no conscious control over their actions (R v T; Broome v Perkins)

31
Q

What is the distinction between Automatism and Insanity?

A

Focus on the source of the automatism (internal vs. external)

32
Q

How does Voluntary Intoxication impact criminal liability?

A

Relevance to criminal liability depending on whether it was voluntary or involuntary

33
Q

What is the general rule for Voluntary Intoxication in specific intent crimes?

A

Not a defence but may negate specific intent in some cases

34
Q

What is the relevance of Involuntary Intoxication in criminal cases?

A

May be a defence to both specific and basic intent crimes if the defendant lacked mens rea