Attachments Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Describe the Ainsworth 1971 study of a strange situation.

A

A. Mother and child enter play room together.
B. CHILD ALLOWED TO EXPLORE. FEMALE ENTERS AND TALKS TO MOTHER AND CHILD
C. Mother leaves while the stranger is talking to the child
D. Stranger interacts with the child
E. Mother returns and stranger leaves
F. MOTHER LEAVES CHILD TO PLAY ALONE
G. STRANGER RETURNS TO BE ALONE WITH CHILD
H. MOTHER RETURNS TO ROOM FOR FINAL TIME

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

What were the characteristics of a Secure (Type B) child in reference to the findings of the strange situation?

A

70%

Happy to explore, trust mother not to leave

Feel distress when mother leaves

Will engage with stranger but they treat them differently as the stranger returns

The child greets the mother and is quickly comforted when the mother returns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the characteristics of an insecure avoidant?

A

20%

Willing to explore and ignores mother when present or not.

Suffer little or no distress when the mother leaves

They treat the mother and stranger the same

They ignore the mother during to reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the characteristics of an insecure resistant?

A

10%

They are anxious and clingy to the mother

Are extremely distressed when they are left by the mother

They actively resist strangers attempt to console them

They are ambivalent at reunion (wants comfort then rejects mother)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe Harlow’s study in 1959.

A

PROCEDURE: 8 infant monkeys were taken from their mothers and kept separately in a cage with two substitute mothers. A cloth mother and a wire mother. For 4 of the 8 monkeys were fed by the wire mother and the other 4 were fed by the cloth mother. They were then released into a cage of normal monkeys to see how they reacted. He also put a teddy bear drummer toy in the cage to see their reaction when they are frightened.
FINDINGS: Infant monkeys preferred to spend time with the cloth mother. They all ran to the cloth mother when they were frightened. ALL monkeys were antisocial and aggressive. They couldn’t form any friendships, and neglected any offspring.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Give 3 criticisms of Harlow’s study

A

it lacks ecological validity, conducted in an artificial setting.
Lacks population validity, monkeys have fewer cognitive abilities.
Ethical issues because monkeys can’t give consent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the learning theory of attachment.

A

CLASSICAL CONDITIONING:
Unconditioned stimulus-unconditioned response

Unconditioned stimulus
Neutral stimulus- unconditioned response

Conditioned stimulus- Conditioned response
The baby feels pleasure when being fed, associates food with the car giver, feels pleasure when they see the care giver.
OPERANT CONDITIONING:
Baby cries-Gets fed= baby cries to be fed more often
So they appear to have an attachment with the parent but have learned to associate food with a set of behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the Evolutionary explanation to an attachment.

A

Newborns seem helpless, born with a repertoire of biologically pre-programmed abilities (social releasers) all designed to ensure proximity and care. Smiling, crying, making eye contact, ensure short term survival because the adults care for the. Later on, abilities ensure that adults interact with the growing child, so offer a TEMPLATE for future relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Bowlby’s explanation of an attachment.

A

BABIES ARE LIKE CHICKS- both need proximity to survive. Imprinting- process of forming a strong bond.
SURVIVAL- Short term, food and shelter=staying alive. Long term, reproducing.
MONOTROPY- One special attachment
CRITICAL PERIOD- attachment must form between 0-2.5 years.
CONTINUITY HYPOTHESIS- maternal sensitivity-infant attachment style-internal working model (template set of expectations or beliefs on relationships)- Future relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe how Genie, Harlow and Goldfarbs studies all evaluate Bowlbys explanation of attachment.

A

GENIE- Didn’t learn how to make relationships in later life.
HARLOW- monkeys still went for cloth mother for comfort and not food. Attachment figure is a secure base to explore form. Lacked in social skills and neglected their own baby.
GOLDFARB- children who were raised with fostered parents had closer care than those in a children’s home. Attachements, are used to develop, intellectual and emotional skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happened in the case of Genie?

A

She was isolated in a room by her father and had no communication with anyone. She was beaten if she made a noise she was given thread less cotton reels and cottage cheese containers. When Genie reached 13 her mum took her to a hospital where they believed her to be 6 or 7 with autism. She later never had the ability to make friendships as she was socially, intellectually and emotionally underdeveloped

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is one strength and one limitation of Bowlby’s explanation of attachments?

A

STRENGTH: it’s supported by empiricle evidence- genie no attachment=less developed

LIMITATION: it’s deterministic, Childs adult relationship determined by experiences and attachments as a child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonemberg 1988?

A

META ANALYSIS
Took results of the strange situations from a variation of countries.
RESULTS:
Great Britain- 75% secure, 22% avoidant, 3% resistant
Japan- 68% secure, 5% avoidant, 27% resistant
USA- 65% secure, 21% avoidant, 14% resistant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the Bowlby 44 Thieves experiment?

A

Ps were 88 children ranging in age from 5 to 16 had been referred to child guidance clinic. 44 of the children referred because of stealing, Bowlby identified 16 of these as affectionless psychopaths. Remaining 44 children in the study had not committed any crime just emotionally maladjusted but no antisocial behaviour. Bowlby interviewed children and family and built a record of their lives.

FINDINGS:

  • 86% of thieves affectionless psychopaths experienced ‘early and prolonged separation from mothers’
  • 17% of thieves experienced early and prolonged separation
  • 4% of the non-thieves had early prolonged separation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the Robertson and Robertson study.

A

JOHN:
17 months, nursery 9 days while his mother was away. Other children were noisy, demanding and aggressive so John was left out so protested but they were ignored. This lasted for several days, he got all attention they could give, refused food and wouldn’t sleep. His conditioned worsened each day, he began to ignore nurses and his dad. This was called sequence of distress,

THOMAS:
Robertson’s temporary fostered Thomas he was 28 months old. Robertsons met Thomas before fostering him, he settled in well. Received constant, patient high quality care, he bought some things from home. Thomas was pleased to see his father each day, but was upset when he left. In 2nd week he cried more for his mother. Was successfully reunited with his mother, he was more aggressive this could be down to a new child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define disruption to attachment.

A

Attachments form but it is broken can be Short Term or Long Term, form of separation.

16
Q

Define failure to form an attachment.

A

No attachment has a chance to form

17
Q

Define institutional care.

A

Care provided in an institution (nursery), not a family home.

18
Q

Describe Goldfarb’s study in 1943.

A

2 groups of children, 15 in each. Institution group raised in children’s home until 3, placed in foster homes. Fostered group, placed in foster homes straight away or within 9 months. Both groups evenly matched, then tested them again at 10 and 14.
FINDINGS:
Age of 3 institution group behind in language development struggled forming relationships.
At 10 and 14 institution legged behind, average I.Q. 72 compared to 95 fostered group, restless couldn’t concentrate, struggled forming attachments.

19
Q

What studies link with Long term disruption, privation and institutional care, privation, privation and institutional care, short term disruption?

A

ROBERTSON AND ROBERTSON- short term disruption

BOWLBY 44 THIEVES- long term disruption

GENIE- privation

GOLDFARB- privation and institutional care

HODGES AND TIZARD- privation and institutional care

20
Q

Describe the Hodges and Tizard study in 1989.

A

65 children in care assessed over 16 years. All aged 16, been in institutional care since 4, not formed attachments high turn over of staff. At the age of 4: 25 of the children returned to biological parents, 33 adopted, 7 remained in institution.

FINDINGS:

  • at 16 17/21 mothers felt deeply attached
  • half restored children described as deeply attached
  • ex-institution greater problems with siblings than comparison group
  • no difference regarding number of contacts with opposite sex
  • ex-institutional poorer relationships bullied more.