ATTACHMENTS 1.0 Flashcards
name 2 caregiver interactions (4)
reciprocity
-> action from one partner elicits a response from other partner
-> idea of turn taking
interactional synchrony
-> when responses are made in spec time frame to sustain a convo
-> may produce same action simultaneously
what was the aim of meltzoff and moore?
to observe interactional synchrony in young human babies 1977
what were meltzoff and moore procedure (5)
- infants ages 2-3 weeks took part in a controlled obs
- 4 actions carried out by adult + infants reponse recorded on tape
tongue perusion,mouth opening,lip protrusion,hand opening - recorded reponses watched by observer in slow motion
- vid then shown to independant observers who were asked what the infants were doing without knowing what action they had seen the adults do.
- each observer rated each vid twice .. inter and intra observer reliability could be measured
what were the findings of meltzoff and moore?
assosiation found between infant behaviour and adult model-> copied the adults
later shown in infants as young as 3 years old
what were the conclusions of meltzoff and moore?
interactional synchrony does occur in young human infants
what are the + of meltzoff and moore? (2)
- controlled procedure -> both adult and infant filmed often at multiple angles… ensuring fine details of behaviours to be repeted and analysed
- babies do not know being obs .. no demand characteristrics.. higher internal validity
- of meltzoff and moore?
- eventhough pattern sof interactional synchrony shown, diff to know if infant means to imitate adult as they are unabe to exress their reasons… we do not know if behavours are deliberate and conscious
- obs do not tell us purpose of synchrony and reciprocity. Feldman points out there may be some evidence synchrony helpful to developemt of mother infant attachemnt as well as emotiona dn lang development
what was the aim of schaffer and emerson 1964?
1964 to explore age of onset and intensity of attachments
what was the procedure of schaffer and emerson?
60 bbs from working class areas of glasgow visited monthly -> first 12 months then at 18 months old r observed stranger anxiety when approached recorded sep anx thru interview w mothers mothers interviewed about bby resp to 7 everyday situations -> mother rated bbys response from 0 to 3
what were the conclusions of schaffer and emerson research?
human bab go thru 4 processes to make attachments
- > asocial 0-6 weeks
- > indiscriminate 6 weeks to 7 months
- > specific 7 to 10/11 months
- > multiple10/11 months onwards
what are the characteristics in Asocial stage
stars forming bonds w carers
shows bias to humanlike stimuli … prefer faces
learn familiar ppl by smell and voice.
shows some prefference to familiar adults.. calmed more easily by familiar adults
what are the characterisics of indiscriminate stage?
becomes more social tell ppl apart and prefer human company no fear of strangers-> comforted by anyone but do prefer famil adults most bbys no sep anx now no attachment yet
specific?
sep anx is shown when primary attach figure leaves them alone -> attachment formed
stranger anx shown towards unknown ppl
multiple?
attachments shown towards multiple ppl
esp those who they spend lots of time with
+ of schaffer and emerson
obs carried out in families own homes
… high ecological validity
babies very young .. behaviour unlikely to be affected by presence of observers
- of schaffer and emerson
interviews w mothers biased
-> may want to make bby viewed in more pos light
.. rate bby really low -> say theydont protest
.. reducing internal validity of study
problem with how mult attach assessed
just bc baby gets distressed when an inidiv leaves room-> does not mean indiv is a ‘true’ attachment fig
-> Geiger children still have playmates as well .. may get distressed if playmate leaves room but doesnt mean they are attached
..r may lack internal validity
what is the pos role of the father?
gieger -> motehrs more nurturing than fathers however infants find interactios with fathers more exciting and pleasureable
-> preferred as playmates
lamb -> fathers who were main caregiver to a child quickly able to become highly sens to childs needs
… sugg sens parenting not limited to female parents
what are the neg role of fatehrs
hardy -> f less able to detect low levels of infant distress than mothers … sugg less affectionate and less sen as priamry caregivers
what is imprinting?
young animals form strong bond w first moving objects they see
what were the aims of lorenz?
1935 investigate mechanism of imprinting
what was lorenz procedure?
divided clutch of goose eggs in 2 grps. one half was hatched by mother goose in normal conditions
one half placed in incubator .. first moving thing saw was lorenz
following behvaiour of goose were recorded
lorenz marked goslings… knew which grp they were from+placed them all under a box. Box lifted following behaviour observed
-> if it followed the biological mother goose, or lorenz
what were the findings of lorenz?
naturally hatched gossling followed mother goose
incubator gosslings foloowed L
-> when box removed gosling went to “parent” saw during hatching
.. sugg bond made to lorenz irreversible as goslings did not go to mother
imprinting would occur between 4-25 hours after hatching
hoslings who imprinted ton L tried to mate w humans when sexually mature
what were the conclusions of lorenz?
imprinting irrversible behav
-> under biologicial control + noit learnt
close contact maintained w first moving object seen
imprinting has to happen in spec time period -> critical period
imprinting maintians offsprings safety + could be important to mating habits later on in life