Attachment of SI Flashcards
In general how does attachment of SI work?
In general -> a SI that is enforceable against the debtor with respect to the collateral is said to have “attached” to the collateral when:
-> value given by the secured party (e.g. the loan)
-> the debtor has rights in the collateral
AND
-> the debtor has authenticated a security agreement that describes the collateral, OR the secured party has possession or control of the collateral
What is the value given by the secured party?
Can be
-> consideration sufficient to form a contract (money to form K),
-> extending credit if there was already a prior agreement,
-> accepting delivery under a preexisting contract,
OR
-> in satisfaction of a preexisting claim.
-> future advances - may also be secured by collateral
-> new value - when new value is required to perfect a security interest or have priority, it can consists of: money; money’s worth in property, services, or new credit, OR release by a transferee (person receiving property) of an interest in property previously transferred to the transferee
Is there ever a time when consignment can prevent a debtor from using the consigned property as collateral for a security interest?
Generally -> the SI attaches only to the rights that the debtor has in the collateral
Consignments -> if the consignor retains title to the consigned goods, the consignee (person giving property to consignor) does not have rights in them so can’t use them as collateral
Does a security agreement need to satisfy the statute of frauds?
The secured party must satisfy the Art. 9 statute of frauds, unless the secured party possess or controls the collateral.
What requirements must a security agreement meet in order to satisfy attachment?
The security agreement must
-> be in a records (can be in writing or via an electronic database)
-> contain a description of the collateral
AND
-> be authenticated by the debtor
What is the level of specificity you need to find in the description portion of a security agreement?
The description can list specific items or can identify the Art. 9 class of collateral (“all debtor’s equipment”)
UNLESS
the collateral is consumer goods or a commercial tort claim (then you need more specificity);
A super-generic description (“all debtor’s assets”) is NOT SUFFICIENT
Who can reuse a prior existing security agreement as a new security agreement?
An original authenticated security agreement can serve as a new debtor’s authenticated security agreement (i.e., the new debtor need not execute another agreement) by operation of law or by contract
So a new debtor can reuse an already authenticated security agreements from a prior debtor.
Can the possession or control of collateral satisfy the SoF?
Yes, it can satisfy the SoF; the secured party’s possession or control must be pursuant to the security agreement
Can the SI apply to after-acquired collateral? If so, what is needed in the security agreement to make this work?
General rule
-> the SI may cover collateral owned when the security is granted and also collateral that the debtor acquires after the SI is given
-> the clause needs to be in the agreement between parties
When does an after-acquired clause not work for a particular class of goods? Is there a way to make it apply to that particular class?
An after-acquired clause is not effective for consumer goods,
UNLESS the debtor acquires them within 10 days after the secured party gives value, or a commercial tort claim.
Do proceeds work as an SI and when does attachment happen?
The SI attaches AUTOMATICALLY to identifiable proceeds (i.e., whatever is acquired upon disposition of the collateral)
E.g. There is a SI in a car, you sell the car, any proceeds from the car are now the new SI.
What are the duties of the secured party when in possession or control of the collateral?
Duties arising from the secured party’s possession or control of collateral:
-> duty of care
-> duty to keep collateral identifiable
-> duty to relinquish possession or control of collateral
What are the rights of the secured party when in possession or control of the collateral?
Rights arising from the secured party’s possession or control of collateral
-> right to charge for reasonable expenses
-> right to use or operate collateral
-> right to hold proceeds
When the secured party has possession or control of the collateral good, who bears the risk of loss or damage with regards to the collateral?
Risk of loss or damage is on the debtor STILL
What must transpire in order for there to be a valid assignment of account rights between the secured party and the account debtor?
Assignment of account rights
-> if the debtor assigns his right to receive payment from the account debtor (person obligated to make payment to the debtor) to the secured party, the secured party may notify the account debtor to pay the secured party;
-> UPON receipt of notification, the account debtor may discharge her obligation only by paying the assignee (aka the secured party in this case)