Attachment Flashcards
Meltzoff and Moore (1977) In support
Procedure: Observed the beginning of interactional synchrony in babies as young as 2 weeks.
Double blind study - adults displayed one of 3 facial expressions Baby responses were filmed and labelled by independent observes.
Findings: Baby would coordinate their movement with their parent/guardians this is interactional synchrony.
A-A* Condon and sander (1974) In support
Procedure: Frame by frame video recordings of infants movements.
Findings: Infants movement coordinated their actions in sequence with adult speech.
Isabella et al (1989) In support
Procedure: Observed 30 mothers and babies assessed the degree of synchrony.
Findings: High levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-baby attachment.
Le vine et al (1994) Against
Interactional synchrony is not found in all cultures.
Procedure: Kenya mothers have little physical contact or interactions with their infant but some infants have high proportions of secure attachment.
Koepke et al (1983)
Attempted to replicate Meltzoff and Moore’s findings but failed to produce the same results.
Tronick’s Still face paradigm
Mother interacts with baby normally then makes a straight face. the infant then try’s to get the mothers attention as it notices that the mother isn’t interacting. The baby becomes distressed and starts crying when the baby cant get the attention of the mother.
Strengths of reciprocity and interactional synchrony. List as many as possible:
Controlled condition - increases internal validity and reliability, concurrent validity.
Inter-rater reliability as observation are often recorded. 0.8
unaware of observation - natural behaviour
Practical application parent child interaction Therapy Crotwell et al (2013) found 10 min session increased the bond
Weaknesses of reciprocity and interactional synchrony. List as many as possible:
Relies on inferences and assuming intentionality as we cant fully understand what a baby is doing or saying.
Feldman (2012) doesn’t tell us the development purpose of this behaviour .
Ethics - ethical implications in studying children.
Socially sensitive
Some study’s fail to replicate findings such as koepke et al. cross culture research
observer bias.
Schaffer and Emerson (1964) In support
Procedure: Involved 60 babies - 31 males, 29 females In Glasgow. The babies and mothers were visited every month for the first year and again at 18 months. A longitudinal study.
Findings: Four distinct stages in the development of infant attachment behaviour which make up their theory. (asocial, indiscriminate, specific and Multiple attachment)
Bowlby (1969) Contradictory
One primary attachment (monotropy) and any other attachment after that were of minor significance
Carpenter (1975) Contradictory
2 week babies show distress after being shown there mothers face followed by babies recognise are attracted to mothers face from an early stage.
Van Ijendoon et al (1993) Contradictory
babies form multiple attachments from the outset.
Geiger (1996)
Suggests father play interactions are more exciting and mothers are more nurturing and affectionate.
Grossman et al (2002)
Longitudinal study of 44 families comparing roles of fathers and mothers contribution to their children attachment experiences at 6, 10 and 16 years.
Linked to the father own internal working model of attachment.
Suggests the father is less important than attachment to mother but also that father have the role of play and stimulation less to do with emotions
McCallum and Golombok (2004)
shows that these children do not develop differently from children in two parents heterosexual families
Pedersen (1979)
Focused on poor socioeconomic background so it may be social factors related to poverty not to the absence of fathers.
Lamb (1987) In support
Fathers who become main caregiver are able to quickly develop more sensitive to childs needs
Lucassen et al (2011) in support
Higher levels of sensitivity were associated with greater levels of infant-father attachment security. Fathers are more sensitive to their childrens needs
Hrdy (1999) Against
Fathers are less able than mothers to detect low levels of infants distress
Field (1978)
Spent more time smiling imitating and holding babies that the secondary caregiver fathers. (4 month old babies were filmed)
Brown et al. (2012)
Gender of a caregiver is less important, focuses on who takes care of the babies more often (child security at 13 month and 3 years)
Lorenz research on Geese
Procedure: Randomly dived Greylag geese eggs into two batches. Half hatch in there natural environment with the mother goose and the other half hatch in an incubator and the first moving object was lorenz.
Findings: incubator group followed lorenz everywhere, mixed the groups up and found that naturally hatched eggs went straight to the mother while the incubator group went to lorenz. The bonds proved to be irreversible.
Critical period takes place within a few hours.
Regaling and Vallorigara (1995)
Chick’s exposed to simple shape combinations that move - they followed the original most closely. Supports young animals are born with an innate mechanism to imprint on moving object present in that window of imprinting.
Peter seebach (2005)
Computer users exhibit ‘baby duck syndrome’ which is the attachment formed to their first computer operating system leading then to reject others.