attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is reciprocity? what evidence is there to support

A

taking turns as in a conversation
Jaffe – demonstrated that infants coordinated their actions with caregivers in a conversation.
Brazelton – suggested that this basic rhythms is an important precursor for later communications, allows the caregiver to anticipate the infant’s behaviour and responds appropriately. Caregiver’s sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is interactional synchrony? evidence

A

Interactional synchrony – coordinated behaviour, mirroring
Meltzoff and Moore – 3 day old babies imitate mothers actions, ruled out the possibility that imitations are learned, response must be innate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what was Meltzoff and Moore’s study?

A

Meltzoff and Moore study:
* Infants 2-3 weeks old imitated specific facial and hand gestures
* The adult would display one of three facial expressions or hand movements
* The child’s response was filmed
* Found that there was an association between the infant behaviour and the that of the adult model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what was the still face study? supports MandM

A

Evidence to support Meltzoff and Moore
Still face study:
* Murray and Trevarthen
* two month old first interacted by a video monitor played a tape with the mother in real time.
* The video monitor played a tape of the mother so that the image on screen was not responding to the infant’s facial and bodily gestures.
* Resulting in acute distress.
* Infant tried to attract their mothers’ interest but gained no response
* Shows that infant is actively eliciting a response rather than displaying a response that has been rewarded
* Further supports behaviours are innate rather than learned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what were the stages of attachment? schaffer and Emerson

A

Asocial – 0-2months respond similar to animate and inanimate objects

Indiscriminate – 2-7months, start to prefer animate objects and human comfort rather than inanimate, relatively easily comforted by anyone, don’t show stranger’s anxiety

Discriminate – 7-9months, developed separation and stranger anxiety, preference to one person that they have formed an attachment with. Formed an attachment with the primary caregiver
65% children first attachment was the mother
30% mother was first joint object of attachment
3% Fathers were the sole attachment
27% fathers were joint first object of attachment

Multiple attachments – 9+ months, within one month of first attachment, 29% had an attachment to someone else, parent, grandparent, sibling etc. within 6 months of first attachment 78% of infants had a second attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was Harlow’s procedure?

A

Created two wire mothers, one wired, one cloth covered.
8 infant monkeys were studied for 165 days
4 of the monkeys the milk bottle was on the cloth covered monkey
4 of the monkeys the milk bottle was on the wired monkey
Measurements were made of the amount of time each infant spent with the two different mothers.
Observations were also made of the monkey infants responses when frightened by the mechanical teddy bear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were Harlow’s findings?

A

8 monkeys spent most of their time with the cloth-covered mother whether or not the mother had the feeding bottle
Those monkeys who fed from the wired mother only spent a short time getting milk then returned to cloth-covered monkey
When frightened all monkeys clung to the cloth covered mother
Suggest infants don’t develop an attachment to the person who feeds them but the person offering contact comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were the lasting consequences of Harlow’s study?

A

Noted the consequences of their early attachment experiences
Motherless monkeys, even those with contact comfort developed abnormally
Socially abnormal
Sexually abnormal – did not show normal mating behaviours, did not cradle their own babies, killed their babies
There was a critical period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was Lorenz’s procedure?

A

Took a clutch of gosling eggs and divided them into two groups.
One left with natural mother
Other eggs were placed in an incubator
When eggs in incubator hatched, first moving thing they saw was Lorenz.
The goslings started to follow Lorenz
To test the effect of imprinting, Lorenz marked the two groups to distinguish them. Placed together and walked away and the goslings followed, they had imprinted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were Lorenz’s findings?

A

Goslings divided themselves up, following their natural mother and the other group following Lorenz
Lorenz noted that the process of imprinting is restricted to a definite period, critical period
If a young animal is not exposed to a moving object during the critical period the animal will not imprint
Suggests that animals can imprint on a persistently present moving object seen within its first 2 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were lasting consequences of Lorenz’s study?

A

Process is irreversible and long lasting
Early imprinting had an effect on later mate preferences, sexual imprinting
Animals will choose to mate with the same kind of object which they were imprinted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did Guiton find?

A

Guiton, chicks imprinted on a yellow rubber glove, support the view that young animals are not born with a predisposition to imprint on a specific type of object. Also found that the male chickens later tried to mate with the gloves, showing early imprinting is linked to later reproductive behaviour - supporting Lorenz
however
Guiton found that imprinting is reversible, chickens who tried to mate with rubber gloves, if they spent time with their own species, able to engage in normal sexual behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the learning theory explanation, CC?

A

Innate stimulus is food which produces the innate response of pleasure. Food is the UCS and pleasure is UCR.
The mother is the NS, if NS is regularly and consistently associated with a UCS and will produce the same response
So NS is now CS and produces CR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the learning theory explanation, OC?

A

Dollard and Miller offered an explanation of attachment based on operant conditioning and drive reduction theory
A drive is something that motivates behaviour, case of hungry infant, there is a drive to reduce the accompany discomfort
When infant is fed, the drive is reduced and produces a feeling of pleasure. This is rewarding, positive reinforcement. Food becomes a primary reinforcer because it supplies the reward, reinforcing the behaviour that avoided discomfort
Attachment occurs because the child seeks the person who can supply the reward.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the social learning theory of the learning explanation?

A

Hay and Vespo suggested the modelling could be used to explain attachment behaviours, proposed that children observe their parent’s affectionate behaviour and imitate this. Parents would also deliberately instruct their children about how to behave in relationships and reward appropriate attachment behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what was Ainsworth’s aim for strange situation?

A

was to be able to observe key attachment behaviours as a means of assessing the quality of child’s attachment to a caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what was the procedure of strange situation?

A

controlled observation, two-way mirror
Behaviours used to judge attachment: proximity seeking, exploration and secure-base, stranger anxiety, separation anxiety, response to reunion
* Child and caregiver enter
* Child encouraged to explore
* A stranger enters and tries to interact with child
* Caregiver leaves the child and stranger together
* Caregiver returns and stranger leaves
* Caregiver leaves the child alone
* Stranger returns
* Caregiver returns and is reunited with child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what were the findings of strange situation?

A

Secure attachment – type B, show moderate separation distress and stranger anxiety, 60-75% of toddlers have this attachment

Insecure-avoidant attachment – type A, show little reaction when caregiver leaves, little effort when caregiver return, little stranger anxiety, 20-25% of toddler have this attachment

Insecure resistant attachment – type C, show high levels of distress of separation and stranger anxiety, but resist comfort when reunited, 3% of toddler have this attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what was the procedure of Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s meta-analysis?

A

Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg conducted a meta-analysis to look at attachment types across cultures and countries
Procedure – 32 studies of attachment where strange situation had been used to investigate infant attachment types.
32 studies in 8 countries, 15 in the US
Almost 2000 infants

20
Q

what were the findings of the meta-analysis for cultural variations?

A

secure attachment was the most common in all countries
75% in Britain and 50% in China
Insecure-resistant was least common, Britain 3% and Israel 30%.
Insecure-avoidant most commonly in Germany 30% and least commonly in Japan 5%
Variations in US, one study found 46% securely attachment, while another found 90% securely attached

21
Q

what was Simonella’ study on attachment?

A

conducted a study in Italy to see whether the babies of different attachment still match those in previous studies.
Assessed 76 12-month infants using strange situation
Findings – 50% secure, 36% insecure avoidant
This is a lower rate of secure attachment, suggests that this is because of increasing numbers of mothers of children work long hours and use professional childcare

22
Q

what was the procedure of Rutter’s ERA privation study?

A

Rutter followed 165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain to test to what extent good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions
Physical, cognitive and emotional development has been assessed at age 4, 6, 11 and 15 years
Compared to control group, 52 British children adopted around the same time.

23
Q

what were the findings of Rutter’s ERA study?

A

when arrived in the UK, adoptees showed signs of delayed intellectual development and the majority were undernourished.
Age 11 the adopted children showed differential rates of recovery that were related to their age of adoption. Mean IQ of those children adopted before 6 months was 102, compared to those adopted between 6 months and 2 years was 86, those adopted after 2 years was 77.

24
Q

what was the procedure for Zeanah’s Buharest project?

A

assessed attachment in 95 children aged 12-31 months. Who had spent most of their lives in institutional care, 90%. Compared to a control group of 50 children who had never lived in an institution
Attachment type was measured using the strange situation

25
Q

what were the findings from Zeanah’s study?

A

74% of the control group came out securely attached. 19% of the institutional group were securely attached, 65% classified with disorganised attachment

26
Q

what were the effects of institutionalisation?

A

Disinhibited attachment is a typical effect of spending time in an institution
Equally friendly and affectionate toward people they know well or who are strangers that they have just met, highly unusual behaviour.
Rutter explained disinhibited attachment as an adaption to living with multiple caregivers during the sensitive period for attachment formation.
Mental retardation – must children showed signed of retardation when they arrived in Britain. Most of those adopted before they were 6 months old, control group aged 4.
Appears that emotional development, damage to intellectual development as a result of institutionalisation can be recovered provided adoption takes place before the age of 6 months.

27
Q

what is Bowlby’ theory of attachment, who influenced him and evolution side?

A

Lorenz’s research on imprinting led Bowlby to assume that a similar process was operating in humans. Attachment behaviour evolved because it serves an important survival function. Infant who is not attached is less protected. Distant infant ancestors would have been in danger if they didn’t remain close to an adult

28
Q

why are attachments important according to Bowlby?

A

Important that attachments are formed, parents must also be attached to their infants in order to ensure that they are cared for and survive. It is only the parents who look after their offspring that are likely to produce subsequent generations.

29
Q

what is the critical period?

A

Critical period – babies have innate drive to become attached
Critical period is around 3-6 months, infant who don’t have the opportunity to form an attachment, will find it difficult later on in life.
Bowlby proposed that attachment is determined by sensitivity, influenced by Ainsworth. Observations of mothers led her to suggest that the infants who seemed strongly attached were the ones who mother was more responsive.

30
Q

what are social releasers?

A

Social releasers – important during attachment developments. Important mechanism of social releasers such as smiling and a babyface, these innate mechanisms explain how attachment to infants are formed.

31
Q

what is monotropy?

A

Monotropy – infants have one special emotional attachment, primary caregiver
Individual is normally the mother but not always, infants may form secondary attachments which act as emotional safety nets and healthy psychological and social development. The importance of monotropy is that an infant has one special relationship and forms a mental representation of this relationship, internal working model.

32
Q

what is the internal working model?

A

Internal working model – short term gives the child insight into the caregiver’s behaviour and enables the child to influence the caregiver’s behaviour, long term it acts as a template for all future relationships because it generates expectations about what intimate, loving relationships are like.

33
Q

what is the continuity hypothesis?

A

Continuity hypothesis – proposes that individuals who are strongly attached in infancy continued to be socially and emotionally competent whereas infants who are not strongly attached have more social and emotional difficulties in childhood and adulthood. Continuity from infancy to adulthood in terms of emotional type

34
Q

what does Bowlby think if a child is deprived will happen to an attachment?

A

Bowlby proposed the prolonged emotional deprivation would have long term consequences in terms of emotional development.

35
Q

what did Bowlby discover about maternal care?

A

Maternal care – findings from 44 thieves study and others came as a surprise as no one had considered the consequences of long term impact that the effects of separation had on infants and children.
Assumed that a good standard of food and physical care was the importance of care.
Bowlby believed that it wasn’t enough, believed that infants and children needed a warm, intimate and continuous relationship with the mother or permanent mother substitute. Mother-love in infancy and childhood is as important for mental health as are vitamins and protein for physical health.

36
Q

what does Maternal deprivation mean about the critical period?

A

Critical period – young child who is denied because of frequent or prolonged separation may become emotionally disturbed. This only applies to a critical period in development, if this happens before 2 ½ years and if there is no substitute.
Potential damage can be avoided if suitable substitute emotional care is provided.

37
Q

what were the long term consequences of deprivation?

A

Long term consequences of deprivation was emotional maladjustment or mental health problems such as depression

38
Q

what is the procedure for the 44 juvenile stud?

A

Bowlby analysed number of his patients that go to his clinic, all children attending were emotionally maladjusted.
44 – thieves, caught stealing
44 – control group from his clinic

39
Q

what were the findings of the 44 juvenile study?

A

those individual diagnosed as affectionless psychopaths have experienced frequent separations from their mothers. 14 thieves diagnosed as affectionless psychopaths, 12/14 of the thieves had experienced prolonged separation. Compared to 5/30 of the other thieves who experienced prolonged separation.
While only 2/44 of control have experienced prolonged separation compared to 17/44.
Early separations often consisted of continual or repeated stays in foster homes or hospitals.
Early separations are linked to affectionless psychopathy

40
Q

what was Hazan and Shaver aim? early attachment influences

A

designed a study to test the internal working model

41
Q

what was the procedure of Hazan and Shavers Love Quiz?

A

Love Quiz in a newspaper
Quiz asked questions about current attachment experiences, attachment history to identify current and childhood attachment types
Also asked questions about attitudes towards love, assessment of IWM.
620 responses from a fair cross-section of the population

42
Q

what were the findings of Hazan and Shavers quiz?

A

analysing self-report of attachment history found that the prevalence of attachment styles was similar to that found in infancy.
56% were classified as secure, 25% avoidant and 19% as resistant
Positive correlation between attachment type and experiences. Securely attached adults described their love experiences as happy friendly and trusting; emphasised being able to accept and support the their partner despite faults.
Relationships between the conception of love and attachment type – securely attached individuals tended to have a positive IWM

43
Q

how does childhood friendship explain IWM and continuity?

A

Minnesota child-parent study found continuity between early attachment and later emotional/social behaviour. Individuals who were classified as securely attached in infancy were higher rated in social competence, less isolated more popular. Can explain IWM because securely attached infants have higher expectations that others are friendly and trusting, enable easier relationships with others.

44
Q

how does bullying reflect IWM?

A

secure, not bullies or bullied, insecure-avoidant, more likely to be bullied because their tendency to struggle to make friends and socially withdrawn, insecure-resistant, more likely to be a bully, because of their insecurity within themselves and fear of rejection.

45
Q

how does poor parents reflect on attachments and the IWM and continuity hypothesis?

A

Quinton showed that the same is true in humans, poor attachment led to later difficulties with parenting, Harlow. Lack of an IWM means that individual lacks a reference point to form relationships with their own children.