Atrial Fibrillation Flashcards

1
Q

Major mechanisms causing AF that can be considered when choosing therapy

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assessment

A

Confirm rhythm diagnosis on ECG.

Perform full cardiovascular examination including BP, HR, murmurs, and signs of HF.

Assess for risk factors and co-morbidities.

  • Risk factors and co-morbidities
  • Obesity
  • Sleep apnoea
  • Hypertension
  • Alcohol excess
  • Thyrotoxicosis
  • Valvular heart disease – aortic or mitral stenosis or regurgitation
  • Cardiomyopathy, which may be rate-related
  • Infection e.g., pneumonia
  • Diabetes
  • Heart failure

Bloods – FBC, renal function, electrolytes, TSH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with AF

A

AF is a leading cause of HF if not controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cardiovascular and other conditions independently associated with AF

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Era of Wearable and Home Monitoring Devices

A

Believe on apple / smart watch

No need for confirmation

Allwhat you need is a trace from the pt

Confirm with ECG/monitoring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Search for underlying cause and correct it

A

Confirm with ECG/monitoring first

  • ‒ Cardiovascular history (hypertension)
  • ‒ Pulmonary disease (obstructive sleep apnoea)
  • ‒Other systemic disease, infection, surgery
  • ‒ Thyroid disease
  • ‒Obesity
  • ‒ Family history
  • ‒Alcohol
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Investigations

A

‒Walk the pt insdie the clinic /stairs for HR check

‒ ECG

‒ Bloods

– FBC, U+E, creat, TFTs, LFTs

‒ Echocardiogram;

  • for pathology and evidence of HF.
  • should be done in all pts
  • standard in NZ

Holter monitor for heart rate control (permanent AF

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Red Flags

A

Chest pain – manage as per Chest Pain pathway

Haemodynamic instability

Heart failure

Recent (within last 14 days) stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA)

Associated mitral stenosis

Syncope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Management

A
    1. Correct underlying problem
    1. Rate Control
    1. Rhythm Control (maintenance of sinus rhythm)
    1. Anticoagulation

If any red flags, seek general medicine advice.

If clearly < 48 hours since AF onset, seek cardiology advice for consideration of acute cardioversion.

Manage risk factors and co-morbidities.

Consider echocardiography.

Assess risk of stroke and the need for oral anticoagulation, both for pts in permanent AF and those with PAF, as both are at the same risk of stroke.

The prevalence of AF and risk of stroke in Maori and Pacific populations is approximately 10 years in advance of European groups.

  • This puts these groups at increased risk at a younger age, and must be considered when discussing anticoagulation options.

Use visual aids to help the pt understand the risks and benefits of anticoagulation.

Commence rate control therapy.

Consider rhythm control including cardioversion and AF ablation, and request non acute cardiology assessment. If unsure whether rhythm control is appropriate, seek cardiology advice.

Follow up regularly and manage other cardiovascular risk factors.

Monitor heart rate. If uncontrolled rate, request non-acute cardiology assessment.

If PAF, assess for anticoagulation as for persistent AF, and seek cardiology advice or request non-acute cardiology assessment, as pts with paroxysmal AF may be better managed with rhythm control, especially if they are symptomatic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Heart Rate Control

A

Aim to reduce HR to

  • walking the pt up and down the surgery corridor may suffice but consider 24 hour Holter monitoring.

‒ Review rate controlling medications regularly especially when they are getting older;

  • Risk of bradycardia
  • PAF is a risk of sick sinus syndrome; these pts often ended on having PPM

In cardiomyopathy treat AF straight away even if they have current infection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Medications:

A

Beta blockers:

Consider metoprolol as initial rate control treatment.

If raised HR, start with 47.5 mg modified release (CR) metoprolol and increment every 24 to 72 hours to a max of 190 mg daily.

  • Monitor BP and HR while dose is being titrated.
  • If pt aged ≥ 80 years and resting HR

Calcium channel blockers

Diltiazem modified release (CD) 120 mg, 180 mg, or 240 mg to a maximum dose of 360 mg daily.

Combination of b-blockers with calcium channel blockers:

For many pts, a combination of a b-blocker and a calcium channel blocker at a medium dose e.g., metoprolol modified release (CR) 95 mg + diltiazem modified release (CD) 120 mg is a better strategy to control HR, and has fewer side effects than a maximal dose of either agent alone.

Digoxin

Third‑choice agent as it has little effect on exercise heart rate.

Use with caution and consider seeking cardiology advice before commencing.

Recent studies have shown higher mortality in pts with AF taking digoxin. 2

If pt is elderly, frail, or has renal impairment, the toxicity risks are higher and may exceed benefits.

Consider requesting non-acute cardiology assessment

  • and check the serum level after 7 days, aiming for a maximum level of
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lifestyle Management

A

‒ BMI < 27; is a huge driven to control AF

‒ Good BP control

‒ No smoking

‒ Regular exercise

‒ Maximum 8 standard drinks/ wee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rhythm Control

A

Preferred for people with:

  • ‒ Paroxysmal AF
  • ‒ Younger age with minimal heart disease
  • ‒WPW syndrome
  • ‒Unacceptable symptoms from AF
  • ‒Haemodynamic compromise
  • ‒ LV impairment
  1. Electrical Cardioversion
  2. Pharmacological maintenance of SR
  • Amiodarone: check TFT in 3/12
  • Flecainide
  • Metoprolol
  • Sotalol; dose 80 BD for AF (but 40 BD if used as blocker), check blood levels and ECG in 2/52
  1. AF ablation (PVI)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pulmonary Vein Isolation

A

‒ Venous approach with trans septal puncture.

‒ Radiofrequency or cryoablation to isolate the pulmonary veins and modify structures that cause re-entry including atrial flutter

  • Not for pt > 75 yrs old; tricky procedure, going form Lt to Rt atrium
  • Done under GA
  • Not used for prevention of thromboembolism
  • Risk of oesophageal perforation; be aware of chest pain post procedure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

A

Indication

  • ‒ Symptomatic AF refractory or intolerant to at least 1 Class 1 or Class 3 antiarrhythmic
  • ‒ Some symptomatic pts with LVF/↓LVEF
  • ‒ Young, active pt

Complications

  • ‒ Thromboembolism
  • – NOAC for 3 months and lifelong if CHADS2 score > 2
  • ‒ Tamponade, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-oesophageal fistula

Results

  • 5 year success 63 - 82%
  • May require repeat procedure but recurrences are common in 1st 3 months and don’t predict poor outcome
  • Maintenance of SR during first 3/12 is very important
  • Better if young, PAF, smaller LA size, no structural heart disease
  • Improved with treatment of BP, obesity, OS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Cardioversion

A

Consider referral in all pts presenting with the first documented episode of atrial fibrillation persisting > 24 hours, provided:

  • AF has not been known to have persisted > 6 months.
  • left atrial size ≤ 35 cm2.
  • associated co-morbidities do not make general anaesthesia high-risk.

When AF clearly < 48 hours, seek general medicine advice for consideration of cardioversion.

When AF > 48 hours pts must:

  • have had therapeutic INR values for ≥ 3 weeks , or
  • have taken dabigatran twice daily without missed doses for 3 weeks, or
  • be shown to be free of LA thrombus on a transoesophageal echocardiogram.

Cardioversion is an effective and low-risk strategy, and can be regularly repeated.

If repeat cardioversions are required more frequently than every 6 months, a different strategy is required.

The cardiology service will advise whether a rhythm control strategy with sotalol, flecainide, or amiodarone is appropriate in the case of successful cardioversions or spontaneous reversion.

It is important to monitor QT regularly when on sotalol, flecainide, and amiodarone.

Pts on flecainide need to be under regular cardiology review.

17
Q

Clinical risk factors of stroke , transient ischaemic attack and systemic embolisation

A

Anticoagulate if score is more than 2

18
Q

Adjusted stroke rate according to CHA2DS2 VASc score

A

CHA2DS2-VASc Calculator for Atrial Fibrillation

https://clincalc.com/Cardiology/Stroke/CHADSVASC.aspx

Score Action

0 No anticoagulation required

1 (female) No anticoagulation required

1 (male) Consider anticoagulation (possibly discuss with cardiologist)

≥ 2 Anticoagulation recommended – consider individual bleeding risk and preference

19
Q

The HAS BLED bleeding risk score

A

AF secondary to thyrotoxicosis does not need anticoagulation

20
Q

NOACs vs Warfarin

A

NOACs are superior to Warfarin, but have increased risk of GI bleed

Reduced rates of:

  • ‒ Stroke (19%)
  • ‒ Haemorrhagic stroke (51%)
  • ‒ Death (10%)
  • ‒ Intracranial haemorrhage (52%)

Increased rate of:

  • GI bleed (25%)
  • 42,411 on NOACS
  • 29,272 on warfarin
21
Q

Novel Oral Anticoagulants Treatment in the Elderly

A

Direct thrombin inhibitor

‒ Dabigatran

  • ‒ 110mg bd >80y
  • ‒ 150mg bd 75
  • – 80y high thromboembolic risk, low bleeding risk
  • ‒ Avoid eGFR < 30
  • ‒ Antidote available

Factor Xa inhibitors

‒ Rivaroxaban ‒ 20mg/day

  • Creatinine clearance 15 – 49 mL/min. 15mg/d
  • Very quick clearance, so can operate on pts quickly and significantly softer than warfarin
  • Elimination from plasma occurs with a terminal half-life of 5-9 h in healthy young subjects and 11-13 h in elderly subjects
  • Higher bleeding risk than Dabigatran

Do not underdose

22
Q

Warfarin

A

Advantages

  • Safe in renal failure.
  • No long-term side effects
  • Long half life means daily dosing and better compliance.
  • Theoretically reversible in primary care, though Vitamin K can take > 24 hours to reverse effects.
  • Quicker reversal agents not available in primary care

Disadvantages

  • Drug and dietary interactions.
  • Needs regular monitoring.
  • Bleeding risk.
23
Q

Dabigatran

A

Advantages

  • Reduced risk of causing intracranial bleeding compared to warfarin
  • Few drug interactions, unaffected by diet.
  • INR monitoring not required.
  • Short half life an advantage in reversal.

Disadvantages

Dose adjustment for renal impairment.

Contraindicated with mechanical heart valve.

Reversible only in secondary care.

150 mg twice daily is associated with an increased risk of GI bleeding compared to warfarin.

  • Risk is not increased with dabigatran 110 mg twice daily.

Short half life means twice daily dosing and potential for poorer compliance with consequent loss of anticoagulation effect

24
Q

Rivaroxaban

A

Advantages

  • Reduced risk of causing intracranial bleeding compared to warfarin
  • Few drug interactions, unaffected by diet.
  • INR monitoring not required.
  • Lower renal clearance than dabigatran (33% rivaroxaban compared to 80% dabigatran)
  • Short half life an advantage in reversal.

Disadvantages

  • Metabolised by CYP3A4.
  • Dose adjustment for renal impairment.
  • Contraindicated with mechanical heart valve.
  • No reversible agent registered or available in New Zealand.
  • Higher rate of GI bleeding compared to warfarin.
  • Short half life means twice daily dosing and potential for poorer compliance with consequent loss of anticoagulation effect
25
Q

Averroes Trial. Aspirin vs Apixaban in Elderly

AVERROES trial

A

Aspirin is not appropriate Rx for stroke prevention in the elderly with AF

Results;

compared with aspirin, apixaban was more efficacious for preventing strokes and systemic embolism in pts ≥85 years

  • absolute rate [AR] 1%/year on apixaban versus 7.5%/year on aspirin
  • compared with younger patients (AR 1.7%/year on apixaban versus 3.4%/year on aspirin).

Major haemorrhage was higher in pts ≥85 years compared with younger pts

  • but similar with apixaban versus aspirin in both young and older individuals (4.9%/year versus 1.0%/year on aspirin and 4.7%/year versus 1.2%/year on apixaban)
  • with no significant treatment-by-age interaction (P-value = 0.65).
26
Q

Request cardiology assessment if:

A

If any red flags, request acute general medicine assessment.

If AF onset is clearly

Request non acute cardiology assessment for:

  • failed rate control (≥ 110 beats per minute) despite maximal therapy.
  • controlled rate but significant symptoms remain.
  • consideration of cardioversion.
  • management of paroxysmal AF.

Seek cardiology advice if:

  • any uncertainty on diagnosis or management.
  • uncertainty about anticoagulation therapy.
  • unsure whether rhythm control is appropriate.