Association Offences Flashcards
A conspiracy is?
An agreement between two or more people to commit an offence. It comes after the intent to commit the crime and before the attempt.
Conspiracy section?
Conspiracy to commit an offence.
Section 310 crimes act 1961
Ingredients for conspiracy section 310 CA1961
- Conspires
- with any person
- to commit any offence or
- to do or omit, in any part of the world
- anything of which the doing or omission in NZ would be an offence
A conspiracy relies on?
The subjects (2 or more people) forming an agreement to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. R v Mulcahy
Mulcahy v R
A conspiracy consists not merely in the intention of two or more, but the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act, or to do an unlawful act by unlawful means. So long as such a design rests in intention only it is not indictable. When two agree to carry it (the intended offence)into effect. The very plot is an act in itself.
At the centr of the conspiracy is
The plan (intended objective) of the parties concerned and the agreement or consensus of the two or more people.
When is conspiracy complete
Conspiracy is complete On agreement being made
PRACTICAL
6 examples of conspiring and misleading justice
Section 116 - 117 EA2006
- preventing a witness from testifying
- threatening or bribing a witness
- threatening or bribing a jury member
- arranging a false alibi
- assisting a witness from leaving the country
- concealing the fact an offence as been committed
- supplying false information to probation officer
SHORT ANSWER
What do you need to prove accessory after the fact?
Section 71 CA61
One who knowing any person to have been a party to the offence, receives, comforts or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him in order to enable him to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction.
SHORT ANSWER
what do you need to prove for section 71 CA61
That the person (person A), who is received, comforted or assisted by the accessory (person B), is a party to an offence that has been committed and
That at the time of receiving, comforting or assisting person A, person B knew that person was a party to the offence and
That person B received, comforted or assisted person A or tampered with or actively suppressed any evidence against person A and
That at the time, the accessorys purpose was to enable person A to escape after arrest or to avoid arrest or conviction.
ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT
section 71 CA61
One who, knowing any person to have been a party to an offence, receives, comforts or assists that person or tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him in order to enable him to escape after arrest or avoid arrest or conviction.
SHORT ANSWER
What was held in Renata?
When the principal offender cannot be identified,it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have been either the principal or a party in one of the ways contemplated in S66(1)
SHORT ANSWER
what was held in S66(2)?
When 2 or more persons form a common intention to prosecute any unlawful purpose, and to assist each other therein, each of them is party to every offence committed by any one of them in the prosecution of the common purpose if the commission of that offence was known to be a probable consequence of the common purpose
SHORT ANSWER
define tainted property
Section 5 CPA2009
(a) Means any property that has wholly or in part been,
I) acquired as a result of criminal activity or
Ii) directly or indirectly derived from significant criminal activity and
(b) includes any property that has been acquired as a result of, or directly or indirectly derived from more than one activity if at least one of those activities is a significant criminal activity.
SHORT ANSWER
what is the meaning of unlawful benefit?
Section 7 CPA2009
A person has unlawfully benefited from significant criminal activity if the person has knowingly, directly or indirectly, derived a benefit from significant criminal activity (whether or not they were involved or undertook the serious criminal activity).
SHORT ANSWERS
explain the doctrine of recent possession?
It applies to receiving as well as theft - it is the presumption that, where the defendant acquired possessions willingly and the proof of how they acquired it is unsatisfactory, is evidence to justify the belief that the finder is either the thief or receiver
SHORT ANSWER
what intent is required for a charge of perjury?
The intention must be to mislead the tribunal! And is complete at the time the false evidence is given.
SHORT ANSWER
what was held in R v Donnelly?
A person cannot be charged with receiving if the stolen property has been returned to the owner even if the receiver had knowledge it was stolen
PRACTICAL
what points should be covered when interviewing someone for money laundering?
- Suspects legitimate income
- Suspects illegitimate income
- Expenditure
- Assets
- Liabilities
- Acquisition of financial records
- Clarification of documentary evidence located
SHORT ANSWER
what is the exception to hearsay rule for conspiracy?
Anything a conspirator or party to a joint charge says or does to further the common purposes admissible against the others involved - this does not include explanations made after the common purpose is carried out
SHORT ANSWER
When can you NOT prosecute for attempts to commit a crime?
- the criminality depends on recklessness or negligence eg, manslaughter
- an attempt to commit an offence is included within the definition of that offence eg, assault
- the offence is such that the act has to have been completed in order for the offence to exist at all.
SHORT ANSWER
When is receiving complete?
As soon as the offender has either exclusively or jointly with the thief or any other person, possession of or control over the property or helps in concealing or disposing of the property.
SHORT ANSWER
What must the prosecution prove against receiving or having control over the stolen property?
That the receiver arranged for the property to be delivered there or that upon discovering the property, he or she, intentionally exercised control over it - control over the property may still be exercised by a receiver when the property is in the possession of the receivers agent or servant.
SHORT ANSWER
What must the high court satisfy when making a profit forfeiture.
Section 55 CPA2009 - if it is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that
- (a) the respondent has unlawfully benefitted from significant criminal activity within the relevant period of criminal offending and
- (b) the respondent has interests in e property