Association Offences Flashcards

1
Q

Conspiracy (act, section, category, penalty and elements)

A

CA 1961 s310

Category:
Same as principal offence

Penalty:
equal to principal offence to a max of 7 years

Elements:
- conspires
- with any person
- To commit any offence OR to do or omit, in any part of the world
- anything of which the doing or omitting in New Zealand would be an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parties (act, section, category, penalty and elements)

A

CA 1961 s66

Category:
Same as principal offence

Penalty:
Same as for principal offence

Elements:
- commits
- does or omits for purpose of aiding
- abets
- incites, counsels, procures

where 2 or more form a common intention, each is party to every offence committed by any of them in carrying out the common intention, if that offence was known to be a probable consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Accessory (act, section, category, penalty and elements)

A

CA 1961 s 71

Category:
Same as principal offence

Penalty:
Principal = life then accessory = 7
Principal = >10 then accessory = 5
All others, accessory = half of Principal

Elements:
- knowing a person to be a party to an offence
- receives, comforts or assists that person OR
- tampers with or suppresses evidence against that person
- with intent to enable that person to avoid arrest or conviction, or escape after arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Attempts (act, section, category, penalty and and elements)

A

CA 1961 s 72

Category:
Same as for principal offence

Penalty:
Principal = life then attempt =10
All other cases, attempt = half of Principal

Elements:
- intent
- act
- proximity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MULCAHY V R

A

A conspiracy consists not merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means. So long as such a design rests in intention only it is not indictable. When two agree to carry it (the intended offence) into effect, the very plot is an act in itself…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R V SANDERS

A

A conspiracy does not end with the making of the agreement. The conspiratorial agreement continues in operation and therefore in existence until it is ended by completion of its performance or abandonment or in any other manner by which agreements are discharged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R V WHITE

A

Where you can prove thay a suspect conspired with other parties (one or more people) whose identities are unknown, that suspect can still be convicted even if the identity of the other parties is never established and remains unknown

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Intent

A

A deliberate act (or omission) to bring about a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Deliberate

A

More than accidental or involuntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Act

A

To take action or do something, to bring about a particular result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Omission

A

The action of excluding or leaving out something or someone, a failure to fulfill a moral or legal obligation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Result

A

Aim, object or purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R V RING

A

Offender convicted of attempted theft even though the item he attempted to steal was not inside the pocket he put his hand into. Had necessary intent and completed the required action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R V HARPUR

A

The court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops … the defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done … is always relevant, though not determinative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

HIGGINS V POLICE

A

Where plants being cultivated as cannabis are not in fact cannabis it is physically, not legally, impossible to cultivate such prohibited plants. Accordingly, it is possible to commit the offence of attempting to cultivate cannabis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

POLICE V JAY

A

A man bought hedge clippings believing they were cannabis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

R V DONNELLY

A

Where stolen property has been returned to the owner or legal title to any such property has been acquired by any person, it is not an offence to subsequently receive it, even though the receiver may know that the property had previously been stolen or dishonestly obtained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

American Model Penal Code examples of attempts

A
  • Lying in wait, searching for or following the contemplated victim
  • enticing the contemplated victim to the scene
  • reconnoitoring the scene of the contemplated crime
  • unlawfully entering a vehicle, place, structure or enclosure in which contemplated crime is to occur
  • possessing, fabricating or collecting materials to be employed in the commission of the contemplated crime
  • soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

No defence to attempts

A
  • defendant was prevented by some outside agent from doing something that was necessary to complete the full offence
  • failed to complete the full offence due to ineptitude, inefficiency or insufficient means
  • prevented from committing the full offence because of some intervening event that made it physically impossibe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

R V PENE

A

A party must intentionally help or encourage - it is insufficient if they were reckless as to whether the principal was assisted or encouraged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

R V RENATA

A

Held that where the principal offender cannot be identified, it is sufficient to prove that each individual accused must have either been the principal or a party in one of the ways contemplated by s66

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

LARKINS V POLICE

A

While it is unnecessary that the principal should be aware that he or she is being assisted, there must be proof of actual assistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

ASHTON V POLICE

A

An example of a secondary party owing a legal duty to a third person or to the general public is a person teaching another person to drive. That person is, in New Zealand, under a legal duty to take reasonable precautions, because under s156 of the CA 1961 he is deemed to be in charge of a dangerous thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

R V RUSSELL

A

Held that the accused was morally bound to take active steps to save his children, but by his deliberate abstention from so doing, and by giving the encouragement and authority of his presence and approval to his wife’s act he became a aider and abettor and thus a secondary offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

R V BETTS AND RIDLEY

A

An offence where no violence is contemplated and the principal offender in carrying out the common aim uses violence, a secondary offender taking no physical part in it would not be held liable for the violence used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Principal party

A

Person who actually commits the offence, has both men’s rea and actus reus. Can be more that one for an offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Secondary party

A

A person who satisfies one of the criteria under s66 (aids, abets, incites, counsels or procures)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Aids

A

Assist either physically or by giving advice and information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Abets

A

Instigate or encourage.

Passive acquiescence may be considered abetting in some situations - similar to aiding by omission - where there is a ‘special relationship’ (legal or moral duty) and a failure to act this could be considered abetting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Incite

A

Rouse, stir up, stimulate, animate, urge, spur on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Counsels

A

Intentionally instigate by advising a person on how best to commit an offence, or planning the commission of an offence for another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Procures

A

Setting out to see that something happens and taking appropriate steps to ensure that it does

To cause an offence or ensure it’s commission by knowingly and intentionally obtaining another person to carry it out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Common intention

A

2 or more offenders agree to and embark on a joint enterprise together (an offence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Innocent agent

A

Someone who is unaware of the significance of their actions. Not liable as a secondary party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

R V CROOKS

A

Knowledge means actual knowledge or belief in the sense of having no real doubt that the person assisted was a party to the relevant offence. Mere suspicion of their involvement in the offence is insufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

R V BRIGGS

A

As with a receiving charge under s246(1), knowledge may also be inferred from wilfully blindness or a deliberate abstention from making inquiries that would confirm the suspected truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

R V MANE

A

To be considered an accessory the acts done by the person must be after the completion of the offence

38
Q

R V GIBBS

A

Highlighted that the acts done by an accessory must be to assist another person in some way to evade justice

39
Q

R V LEVY

A

Defendant convicted as accessory for removing counterfeiting equipment after principal offender arrested, with intent to assist principal offender to evade justice. Held that he had done a deliberate act in relation to the evidence against the offender for the purpose of assisting that offender to evade justice

40
Q

Wilful blindness

A

Intentional ignorance, deliberately not making an enquiry to confirm a belief

41
Q

Recieves

A

Harboring or sheltering an offender

42
Q

Comforts

A

Providing an offender with things (eg food, clothing)

43
Q

Assists

A

Wide variety of things eg transport, lookout, finding buyers of stolen property, misleading authorities etc

44
Q

Tampers

A

Alter (evidence)

45
Q

Suppresses

A

Concealing or destroying (evidence)

46
Q

Perjury (act, section, category, penalty and elements)

A

CA 1961 s108

Category:
3

Penalty:
Principal = <3, perjury = 7
Principal = >3, perjury = 14

Elements:
- a witness making any
- assertion as to any matter of fact, opinion, belief or knowledge
- in any judicial proceeding
- forming part of that witnesses evidence on oath
- whether in open court, or by affidavit or otherwise
- known by that witness to be false and
- intended to mislead the tribunal

47
Q

Conspiring to defeat justice (act, section, category, penalty and elements)

A

CA 1961 section 116

Category:
3

Penalty:
7 yrs

Elements:
- conspires to obstruct OR prevent OR pervert OR defeat
-the course of justice

48
Q

Witness

A

Person who gives evidence and is able to be cross-examined in a proceeding

49
Q

Assertion

A

Something declared or stated positively, often with no support or attempt made at furnishing evidence or proof of the assertions accuracy

50
Q

Fact

A

A thing done, an actual occurrence or event, and it is presented during court proceedings in the form of witness testimony and evidence

51
Q

Opinion

A

A statement that tends to prove or disprove a fact.

Only admissible under s24 and 25 of the Evidence Act 2006 (admissibility of lay person and expert opinion evidence)

52
Q

Belief

A

Subjective feeling regarding the validity of an idea or set of facts. More than suspicion but less than knowledge. Formed as a result of considering available evidence

53
Q

Oath

A

Declaration before a person who has authority to administer an oath, which invokes some religious belief and says that a thing is true or right

54
Q

Affirmation

A

Verbal or written declaration before a person who has authority to administered an oath, saying that a thing is true or right without reference to religious belief

55
Q

Declaration

A

Promise to tell the truth

56
Q

Judicial proceeding

A
  • Court of Justice
  • house of representative
  • any person authorised by law to make an enquiry and take evidence therein on oath
  • legal tribunal by which any legal right or liability can be established
  • any person having the power to hold a judicial proceeding
  • disciplinary officer
  • appeal court
  • Court martial
57
Q

Receiving (act, section, category, penalty and elements)

A

CA 1961 s246

Category:
Depends on value

Penalty:
Value >$1000 = 7yrs
Value $500-1000 = 1 yr
Value <$500 = 3 months

Elements:
- act of receiving
- any property stolen OR obtained by any other imprisonment offence
- knowing that at the time of receiving the property that it had been stolen OR obtained by any other imprisonable offence; OR being reckless as to whether or not the property had been stolen or so obtained

58
Q

R V LUCINSKY

A

The property received must be the property stolen or illegally obtained (or part thereof), and not some other item for which the illegally obtained property had been exchanged or which are the proceeds

59
Q

CAMERON V R

A

Recklessness is established if:
A) the defendant recognized that there was a real possibility that:
- his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; &/or
- that the proscribed circumstances existed; &
B) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

60
Q

R V COX

A

Possession involves two elements. The first, the physical element, is actual or potential physical custody or control. The second, the mental element, is a combination of knowledge and intention: knowledge in the sense of an awareness by the accused that the substance is in his possession and an intention to exercise possession

61
Q

CULLEN V R

A

There are four elements of possession for receiving:
1) awareness that item is where it is
2) awareness that the item has been stolen
3) actual or potential control of the item
4) an intention to exercise that control over the item

62
Q

R V KENNEDY

A

The guilty knowledge that the thing has been stolen or dishonesty obtained must exist at the time of receiving

63
Q

Property (general)

A

Real and personal property, any estate or interest in any real and personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and anything in action, and any other right or interest

64
Q

Theft

A
  • dishonesty
  • without claim of right
  • takes OR deals with
  • any property
  • with intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property or any interest in the property
65
Q

Title

A

A right or claim to the ownership of property

66
Q

Reckless

A

Conscious and deliberate taking of unjustified risk

67
Q

Real possibility

A

Could well happen

68
Q

Doctrine of recent possession

A

Is the presumption that where the defendant acquired possession willingly, the proof of possession by the defendant of property recently stolen is, in the absence of a satisfactory explanation, evidence to justify a belief and finding that the possessor is either the thief or receiver.

69
Q

Conceal

A

In relation to property:
- comceal or disguise the property
- convert from one form to another
- conceal or disguise the nature, source, location, disposition or ownership of the property or of any interest in the property

70
Q

Interest

A

A legal or equitable estate or interest in the property; or a right, power or privilege in connection with the property

71
Q

Deal with

A

In any manner or by any means, including to dispose of the property (by gift, sale or otherwise), transfer possession, bring into NZ, remove from NZ

72
Q

Offence

A

An offence punishable under NZ law including any act, wherever committed that would be an offence in NZ if committed in NZ

73
Q

Proceeds

A

In relation to any offence, means any property that is derived or realised, directly or indirectly, by any person from the commission of the offence

74
Q

Money laundering cycle

A

PLACEMENT - cash enters financial system
LAYERING - money is involved in a number of transactions
INTEGRATION - money is mixed with lawful funds or integrated back into the economy with the appearance of legitimacy

75
Q

Tainted property

A

Wholly or partly been acquired or derived (directly or indirectly) from significant criminal activity

Includes any property from more than 1 activity if at least 1 of the activities is a significant criminal activity

76
Q

Significant criminal activity

A

Offences punishable by 5 years or more imprisonment OR from which proceeds are $30,000 or more

77
Q

Unlawfully benefitted from criminal activity

A

Knowingly derived a benefit from significant criminal activity (whether or not that person undertook or was involved in that activity)

78
Q

Instrument of crime

A

Property used to commit or facilitate the commission of a qualifying instrument forfeiture offence; funds used to commit terrorism; proceeds of any disposition of that property or any other property into which that property is converted, after the commission of the qualifying offence

79
Q

Qualifying instrument forfeiture offence

A

Offence punishable by 5 years or more imprisonment AND includes any attempt, conspiracy, accessory after the fact

80
Q

Money Laundering (act, section, category, penalty and elements)

A

CA 1961 s243

Category:
3

Penalty:
7 yrs

Elements:
- in respect of property that is the proceeds of an offence
- engages in a money laundering transaction
- knowing or believing that all or part of the property is the proceeds of an offence OR being reckless as to whether or not the property is the proceeds of an offence

A person engages in a money laundering transaction if, in concealing any property or by enabling any other person to conceal any property, deals with that property or assists any other person, directly or indirectly, to deal with that property

81
Q

Money laundering transaction

A

In concealing any property, or enabling any person to conceal any property, deals with the property or assists any other person to deal with the property (directly or indirectly)

82
Q

Conspiracy (key case law and definitions)

A

Case Law:
Mulcahy v R (definition)
R v Sanders (ending)
R v White (identity)

Definitions:
Intent (incl. Deliberate, act, omission, result)

83
Q

Attempts (key case law and definitions)

A

Case Law:
R v Ring (physically impossible)
R v Donnelly (legally impossible)
R v Harpur (entire conduct)
Police v Jay (example)
Higgins v Police (example)

Definitions:
Intent (incl. Deliberate, act, omission, result)

84
Q

Parties (key case law and definitions)

A

Case Law:
R v Betts and Ridley (liability)
R v Pene (intent)
R v Renata (identity)
Larkins v Police (awareness)
Ashton v Police (example)
R v Russell (moral duty)

Definitions:
Principal party
Secondary party
Intent (incl. Deliberate, act, omission, result)
Aids
Abets
Incite
Counsel
Procure
Common intention
Innocent agent
Probable consequence

85
Q

Accessory (key case law and definitions)

A

Case Law:
R v Crooks (knowledge)
R v Briggs (knowledge)
R v Mane (party v accessory)
R v Gibbs (intent)
R v Levy (example)

Definitions:
Wilful blindness
Receives
Comforts
Assists
Tampers
Suppresses
Intent (incl. Deliberate, act, omission, result)
Knowledge

86
Q

Receiving (key case law and defintions)

A

Case Law:
R v Lucinsky (property)
Cameron v R (reckless)
R v Donnelly (legally impossible)
R v Cox (possession)
Cullen v R (possession)
R v Kennedy (knowing at time)

Definitions:
Property
Theft
Title
Reckless
Deliberate
Real possibility
Knowledge
Doctrine of recent possession

87
Q

Property (money laundering)

A

Real or personal property of any description, whether situated in New Zealand or elsewhere and whether tangible or intangible, and includes an interest in any such real or personal property

88
Q

Perjury (key case law and definitions)

A

Case Law:
Nil

Definitions:
Witness
Assertion
Fact
Opinion
Belief
Knowledge
Oath
Affirmation
Declaration
Judicial proceeding

89
Q

Money laundering (key case law and definitions)

A

Case Law:
Nil

Definitions:
Property
Reckless (incl deliberate and unjustified)
Conceal
Deal with
Interest
Offence
Proceeds
Money laundering transaction
Money laundering cycle
Knowledge

90
Q

Criminal proceeds (key case law and definitions)

A

Case Law:
Nil

Definitions:
Tainted property
Significant criminal activity (SCA)
Unlawfully benefitted from SCA
Instrument of crime
Qualifying Instrument of Crime Offence