Association Flashcards
What is the mental intent for conspiracy
Intention of those involved to agree AND an intention that the relevant course of conduct should be pursued by those party to the agreement AND intent to commit the full offence
circumstantial evidence from which an offenders intent can be inferred can include
- Offenders actions and words before, during and after event
- the surrounding circumstances
- the nature of the act itself
What is the physical element of conspiracy
The agreement between two or more people to put their common design into effect. Agreement must be made before the commission of the acts which make up the full offence and the object of the conspiracy
Withdrawing from agreement (conspiracy)
A person withdrawing from the agreement is still guilty of conspiracy as are those who become party to the agreement after it has been made. However a person can effectively withdraw before the actual agreement is made
R v Sanders
A conspiracy does not end with the making of the agreement. The conspirital agreement continues in operation and therefore in existence until it is ended by completion of its performance or abandonment or in any other manner by which agreements are discharged
Mulcahy and R
Conspires
A conspiracy consists not merely in the intention of two or more, but in the agreement of two or more to do an unlawful act by u lawful means
Conspiracy
Definition
- mulcahy v R
- R V Sanders
- The conspiritorial agreement requires the operation of both the physical and mental faculties
- the actua Reus (physical element) of conspiracy is the agreement between two or more people to put their common design into effect
- the mens rea (mental intent) necessary for a conspiracy is an intention of those involved to agree AND an intention that the relevant course of conduct should be pursued by those party to the agreement.
Conspiracy
Between two or more persons
A person cannot conspire alone; there must be another conspirator for an offence to be committed
Section 67, Crimes Act 1961
A husband and wife or Civil union partners can commit conspiracy
R v White (1945) GLR 109
The conspiracy may be by a person who could not commit the crime and where you can prove that a suspect conspired with other parties whose identities are unknown, that suspect can still be convicted even if the identity of the other parties is never established and remains unknown
Offence
Any act or omission that is punishable on conviction under any enactment, and are demarcated into four categories
Churchill V Walton
The conspirators need not know it is an offence but must know the act is unlawful
Knowing (AATF)
The accused must have knowledge that the person that they are being an accessory to was party to an offence at the time of assisting them.
Knowing means knowing or correctly believing SIMESTER AND BROOKBANKS : PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LAW
The defendant may believe something wrongly, but cannot know something that is false
R V Crooks
Knowledge means actual knowledge or belief in the sense of having no real doubt that the person assisted was a party to the relevant offence
R v Briggs
Knowledge may also be inferred from wilful blindness or a deliberate abstention from making inquiries that would confirm the suspected truth