Assignment 13 Flashcards
Tort
A wrongful act or an omission, other than a crime or a breach of contract, that invades a legally protected right.
Jurisdiction
A particular court’s power or authority to decide a lawsuit of a certain type or within a certain territory.
Tortfeasor
A person or organization that has committed a tort.
Intentional tort
A tort committed by a person who foresees (or should be able to foresee) that his or her act will harm another person.
Invasion of privacy
An encroachment on another person’s right to be left alone.
Negligence
The failure to exercise the degree of care that a reasonable person in a similar situation would exercise to avoid harming others.
Common law (case law)
Laws that develop out of court decisions in particular cases and establish precedents for future cases.
Plaintiff
The person or entity who files a lawsuit and is named as a party.
Standing to sue
A party’s right to sue, as one who has suffered or will suffer a legal wrong or an adverse effect from an action.
Defendant
The party in a lawsuit against whom a complaint is filed.
Significant contacts rule
Specifies that the substantive law of a state having more significant contacts to the parties could apply, even when the tort occurred elsewhere.
Legal duty
An obligation imposed by law for the preservation of the legally protected rights of others.
Reasonable person test
A standard for the degree of care exercised in a situation that is measured by what a reasonably cautious person would or would not do under similar circumstances.
Common carriers
Airlines, railroads, or trucking companies that furnish transportation to any member of the public seeking their offered services.
Proximate cause
A cause that, in a natural and continuous sequence unbroken by any new and independent cause, produces an event and without which the event would not have happened.
“But for” rule
A rule used to determine whether a defendant’s act was the proximate cause of a plaintiff’s harm based on the determination that the plaintiff’s harm could not have occurred but for the defendant’s act.
Substantial factor rule
A rule used to determine proximate cause of a loss by determining which of the acts are significant factors in causing the harm.
Foreseeability rule
A rule used to determine proximate cause when a plaintiff’s harm is the natural and probably consequence of the defendant’s wrongful act and when an ordinarily reasonable person would have foreseen the harm.
Intervening act
An act, independent of an original act and not readily foreseeable, that breaks the chain of causation and sets a new chain of events in motion that causes harm.
Concurrent causation (concurrent causation doctrine)
A legal doctrine stating that if a loss can be attributed to two or more independent concurrent causes - one or more excluded by the policy and one covered - then the policy covers the loss.
Negligence per se
An act that is considered inherently negligent because of a violation of a law or an ordinance.
Res ipsa loquitur
A legal doctrine that provides that, in some circumstances, negligence is inferred simply by an accident occurring.
Exclusive control
The control of only one person or entity; in tort law the control by the defendant alone of an instrument that caused harm.
Comparative negligence
A common-law principle that requires both parties to a loss to share the financial burden of the bodily injury or property damage according to their respective degrees of fault.
Contributory negligence
A common-law principle that prevents a person who has been harmed from recovering damages if that person’s own negligence contributed in any way to the harm.
Pure comparative negligence rule
A comparative negligence rule that permits a plaintiff to recover damages discounted by his or her own percentage of negligence, as long as the plaintiff is not 100 percent at fault.
50 percent comparative negligence rule
A comparative negligence rule that permits a plaintiff to recover reduced damages so long as the plaintiff’s negligence is not greater than 50 percent of the total negligence leading to harm.
49 percent comparative negligence rule
A comparative negligence rule that permits a plaintiff to recover reduced damages so long as the plaintiff’s negligence is less than the other party’s negligence.
Slight versus gross rule
A rule of comparative negligence that permits the plaintiff to recover only when the plaintiff’s negligence is slight in comparison with the gross negligence of the other party.
Release
A legally binding contract between the parties to a dispute that embodies their agreement, obligates each to fulfill the agreement, and releases both parties from further obligation to one another that relates to the dispute.
Exculpatory clause (exculpatory agreement)
A contractual provision purporting to excuse a party from liability resulting from negligence or an otherwise wrongful act.
Liquidated damages
A reasonable estimation of actual damages, agreed to by contracting parties and included in the contract, to be paid in the event of a breach or for negligence.
Gross negligence
An act or omission that completely disregards the safety or rights of others and is exaggerated or aggravated in nature.
Immunity
A defense that, in certain instances, shields organizations or persons from liability.