Assessment II part II Flashcards

1
Q

MMPI Dates

A

MMPI developed in 1930’s ; MMPI-2 debuted in 1989

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

MMPI Clinical Scales 1, 2, 3

A
  1. Hypochondriasis - Hs2. Depression - D3. Hysteria - Hy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MMPI Clinical Scales 4, 5, 6

A
  1. Psychopathic Deviate - Pd5. Masculinity-Femininity - Mf6. Paranoia - Pa
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MMPI Clinical Scales 7, 8, 9, 0

A
  1. Psychasthenia - Pt8. Schizophrenia - Sc9. Mania - Ma0. Social Introversion - Si
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Requirements for MMPI Test-Taker

A
  • Adequate vision/hearing/hand use- Adequate stamina for 1-2 hour test- Reading comp. of at least 6th grade, English proficiency (recommended 8th grade education)- Borderline or higher IQ- No drugs/alcohol/neuro/psychosis affecting cognitionalso:- Informed consent- Rapport built
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Regular and short form # of questions

A

567 regular, 370 short form (client can stop at 370 for fatigue as well and still have valid validity/clinical scales, but not content scales)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Validity Scales #1: Traditional

A

? Cannot sayL Lie (15 items)F Infrequency (60 items)K Correction (30 items)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Validity Scales #2: MMPI-2

A

VRIN Variable Response Inconsistency Scale (49 items)TRIN True Response Inconsistency Scale (23 items)FB F-Back (40 items)F(p) Infrequency-Psychopathology S Superlative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Purpose of Validity Scales

A
  • Determine test-taking attitude- Correlated with personality traits/behaviors; can enrichinterpretation- Validity determination should not be made on basis of one score/index
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cannot Say Scale (?)

A
  • Number of Unscorable Items because Individual did not answer or answered both T and F- Invalid if ? > 30- Check to see if patients left items blank or answered T+F.Go back and re-answer if possible- Always examine omitted item content
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Variable Response Inconsistency Scale (VRIN)

A
  • 49 pairs of items- Detect inconsistent or contradictory responding- Either similar or different item groups. Similar = inconsistent if one T, one F Different = inconsistent if both T or both F- High scores = difficulty in understanding OR lack of cooperation- VRIN complements L, F, and K interpretation High F, High VRIN = carelessness/confusion High F, Low VRIN = psychopathology or faking bad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

True Response Inconsistency Scale (TRIN)

A
  • 23 pairs of items [like chromosomes]- Detects inconsistent or contradictory responding - Only contains opposite content pairs (e.g. “I am happy” and “I am sad” both marked as T)- High TRIN ( >13 ) = indiscriminate marking of items as true Low TRIN (
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Infrequency (F)

A
  • 60 items; 90% of standard normal group resp. in the same direction on these items, so deviation is unusual- Detects tendency to respond unusually; the main theme is psychoticism- Normal controls score under 55T (Raw = 6)- High F is among most sensitive scales indicating severity of maladjustment. Elevated F = poor comprehension, random responding, severe psychosis, or malingering
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

F-Back Scale (FB)

A
  • 40 items. Same 90% agreement as F scale.- Functions like F but later in the test (After #281, most items between #300-#567)-Theme is acute distress and depression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Infrequency-Psychopathology Scale – F(p)

A
  • Designed to understand F scale elevation, which could be poor comprehension, random response, and fake/real psychopathology- Items were endorsed by
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lie Scale (L)

A
  • Endorsement of culturally-laudable but rare attitudes/practices. Tryin’ to look good- 15 Items- Low: acknowledging faults. Typical of more sophisticated people- High: Rigid, concrete thinker. Likely unsophisticated – obvious attempt to look good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

K Scale (K Correction Scale)

A
  • Measures defensiveness, but less lofty than L; about daily things and coping- 30 items- High: able to manage stressors, competent. Found with vocational achievement and education (higher, not elevated scores show this) - However, High K + emotional problems = lack of insight, dogmatic, controlling - Low: overwhelmed by stressors and unable to cope
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Superlative Self-Presentation Scale (S)

A
  • Measures: belief in goodness, serenity, contentment, patience, denial of anger or moral flaws- Correlates with K scale- High scorers might be relaxed, un-moody, “chill”- Functioning must be looked at. If S+K are high and patient functions, may reflect ego strength. If not, could be faking good
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Validity Indices: F - FB

A
  • If FB > F by 6 or more = Invalid back half and therefore invalid test- Could reflect fatigue or other problems in second half of test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Validity Indices: F - K Index

A
  • Dissimulation Index: one of the originals. Did the individual attempt to exaggerate psychopathology?-F-K > 12 (women) or 17 (men) = “fake bad”-F-K
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Scale 1 - Hypochondriasis (Hs)

A
  • Somatic/Physical Issues Mild elev. –> actual problems High elev. –> vague, bizarre somatic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Scale 2 - Depression (D)

A
  • Distress/Dysphoria Mild elev. –> distress, dissatisfaction, mild depression High elev. –> clinical depression
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Scale 3 - Hysteria (Hy)

A
  • Denial + Physical symptoms Mild elev. –> medical patients w/ mild tendency to avoid feelings; express emotions through ailments High elev. –> denial of emotional problems; tendency to express feelings through symptoms more intense; lack of insight; conforming, naive, immature psychologically
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Scale 4 - Psychopathic Deviate (Pd)

A
  • Rebelliousness, Antisocial behavior Mild elev. –> rebellion that is socially acceptable; dislike of authority High elev. –> tendency for AS/Criminal behavior; serious disregard for authority; angry and impulsive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Scale 5 - Masculinity-Femininity (Mf)
- Elevations = opposite-sex ID- Lower scores = traditional gender role ID/BxDoes not determine sexual orientation.
26
Scale 6 - Paranoia (Pa)
- Mild elevations = suspicion, rationalization, external blame- Higher elevations = frank paranoia; hostility; persecutory anxiety
27
Scale 7 - Psychasthenia (Pt)
- Mild elevations = obsessions, gen. anxiety, self-doubt- Higher elevations = anxiety disorder
28
Scale 8 - Schizophrenia (Sc)
- Mild elevations = bizarre experiences, social alienation, severe stress reaction- High scores (>75) may suggest: psychosis, head injury, schizoid personality, acute distress, substance abuse, cry for help
29
Scale 9 - Hypomania (Ma)
- Mild elevation = distractible, high energy, occasional grandiosity, suspiciousness, irritability- High elevations = hypomania to mania symptoms (expansive, elated, euphoric)Consider activity level.
30
Scale 0 - Social Introversion (Si)
- T
31
Name three possibilities for single-scale invalidity
Cannot say >30VRIN >15TRIN 13
32
What is FB for?
FB compares distress reporting in the two halves of the test to find more subtle fatigue, faking, or emotional provocation in patients.It was determined like the F scale (response pool 90% in agreement, thus endorsement of these items is rare)
33
What is F(p) for?
- F(p) helps understand F scale elevations.- F(p) was determined with a psychiatric population, rather than a normal one, who endorsed
34
Conversion V
132 or 213 (or flipped to 231) * * *Hs D Hy Pd Mf Pa Pt Sc Ma Si- High hypochondriasis, hysteria + depression
35
Passive-Aggressive V (Scarlett O'Hara V)
465 or 645 * * *Hs D Hy Pd Mf Pa Pt Sc Ma Si- High deviance and paranoia w/ elevated MF (gender nonconformity)
36
Psychotic V (Paranoid Valley)
687 or 867 (can be flipped to 768/786) * * *Hs D Hy Pd Mf Pa Pt Sc Ma Si
37
Five Steps in Interpretation
1. Determine validity2. ID significant configurations (up to 3 scales, e.g. "conversion V")3. ID all code types >65T (2- and 3-scale)4. Spike elevations IF only one scale stands out5. ID relevant LOW scoresValid-Config-Code-Spike-Low
38
K+ Profile (false negative)
- K at least 60 K > F by at least 5T L + K > F- No scale above 65T 6 scales below 56TThis may be a defensive person who sees mental problems as weakness. Sometimes high SES, denying. Could be suspicious and fearful. 48% are psychotic? If inpatient, suggest a false negative.
39
Floating Profile
- High F (>80T)- All or most scales about >65A little bit of everything! BPD may figure in; moodiness, outbursts, and various defenses, with no pattern.
40
Seven Report Sections
- Intro, History, Bx Observations, Tests, Results, Summary/Dx, Recommendations
41
Good rapport building stuff for client feedback
- Be empathic- Avoid jargon- Use pg. 1 summary as prop if feasible- Ask patient to summarize to show their comprehension- Don't be defensive; ask for their experience
42
16PF Global Factors (5)
ExtraversionIndependenceTough-mindednessSelf-controlAnxiety"EAST-I" or"i.e. TSA"
43
16PF: RIASEC
RealisticInvestigative ArtisticSocial EnterprisingConventional
44
How many 16PF Items are there?
185.
45
What does PF stand for?
Personality Factors
46
What factor was 'separated out' for the MMPI-2-RF?
Demoralization
47
MMPI: Pros and Cons of RC scales?
Cons: May deviate too far from original scales and previous research may not be useful for this reason. Pros: Equal to higher internal consistency, reliability, validity
48
MMPI: Linear T Scores vs. Uniform
MMPI uses Uniform (similar % values) except for 5 and 0, which are Linear (not forced into normal curve bc they supposedly do not represent clinical constructs)
49
MMPI: Underrepresented Groups
- Native Americans- Asians- 70-84 y.o.- people with under 12 years of education
50
CISS correspondences to Holland Themes
R -- ProducingI -- A(N)alyzingA -- CreatingS -- HelpingE -- InfluencingC -- Organizing[Also Adventuring, which doesn't correspond]PNCHIO PACHIO (both sound kind of like Pinocchio. Might not need to know this anyway.)
51
Campbell Interest and Skills Inventory (CISS)
- 320 items- 6-point Likert Scale- 25 minutes- 6th grade reading level- Age 15 and up (I) High Low High | Pursue Explore |(A) Low | Develop Avoid |
52
CISS Scales and Ranges
- Orientation - Basic Skills and Interests Both 30-70- Occupational 25-75
53
Skill Types
- Transferable- Existing Certifications or Licensures- Hobby Skills- Other
54
Some Work Sample Examples (3)
- Purdue Pegboard- Valpar Work Sample System- Computer Skills / Keyboarding
55
Achievement/Academic Tests (4)
- Woodcock-Johnson- WIAT-III- WRAT-IV- Nelson-Denny
56
Assessing Job Readiness (3)
- Work history- Knowledge of the world of work- Job seeking skills
57
Vocational Goal-setting (3)
- Specificity- Realism- Drive
58
Areas in Vocational Report
- History/Background- Disability Factors- Vocational Goals- Aptitudes- Achievement- Skills- Interests - Samples of Work- Behavior ObservationsBASH DIVAS
59
Attendant Factors
- Limitations based on the person (disability, religious commitments, etc.)
60
Suicide Items on MMPI-2
#303, #506, #520, #524 -- all TRUEMost of time wish I were deadI have recently considered killing myselfLately I have thought a lot about killing myselfNo one knows it but I have tried to kill myself
61
MMPI-2 in specific populations
- Olders: 70+ underrepresented but no new norms needed, only small differences found, T +65 likely indicates same problems across age groups- Adolescents: MMPI-A (1992) 478 items 14-18 7th grade reading level adequate internal const., test-retest less stable over one year.
62
Interpreting Content Scales
- Use entire 567 items (not 370)- Refine meanings of clinical scales- Good consistency/stability/validity- Limited usefulness with: [High K] or [Low L-Low K-High F]T > 65: many descriptorsT 60-65: fewer descriptors
63
Ethnic Groups
- African Americans: few differences if matched by age and SES. Explore context if deviant scores- Hispanics: Spanish available. More similarities than differences, match by SES- Native Americans: moderately high scores in general (T=50-60)- Asian Americans: more research required- Substance Abuse: Scale 4, APS/AAS/MAC-R Less research on Rx drugs than alcohol, scales stay high even after recovery; know patient
64
PTSD
- PK scale - 60 male Vietnam Vets for Norming- Emotional turmoil: anx, worry, guilt, dep., disturbing thoughts, lack of emotional control- Applicability: military. Susceptible to overreporting. PK may indicate general distress if VERY high.
65
Psychotic vs. Neurotic Slope
Psychotic: mostly elevation after 5Neurotic: mostly elevation before 5 VERY GENERAL
66
Spike Profile
Any scale over 65 and higher than all other scales by at least 8 T-scores
67
Non-psychotic 678
Scale 7 (middle, Pt) is the highest. Tense, preoccupied with failure Much less likely to be psychotic than if 7 is lower than 68
68
Uses for Vocational Assessment
- Counseling- Out placement (merger, downsizing, fired)-- transferrable skills- Contract with companies for staffing- HS/Colleges often through parents- Consultant/Expert witness Disability, Social Security, Impact of Injury/Income
69
BFJR
Bona Fide Job Requirement -- used to exclude people from jobs